Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program

被引:40
|
作者
Buchberger, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
Geiger-Gritsch, Sabine [2 ,3 ]
Knapp, Rudolf [4 ]
Gautsch, Kurt [5 ]
Oberaigner, Willi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tirol Kliniken Ltd, Med Dept, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth, Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Technol Assessment, Eduard Wallnofer Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall In Tirol, Austria
[3] Tirol Kliniken Ltd, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Kufstein Cty Hosp, Dept Radiol, Endachstr 27, A-6330 Kufstein, Austria
[5] Innsbruck Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Mammography; Ultrasound; Breast density; Sensitivity; Specificity; INTERVAL BREAST CANCERS; DENSE BREASTS; WOMEN; SONOGRAPHY; US; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the performance of screening with mammography combined with ultrasound versus mammography alone in women at average risk for breast cancer. Methods: 66,680 women underwent physician-performed ultrasound as an adjunct to screening mammography. Histological results and follow-up at one year were used as reference standard for sensitivity. Main outcome measures were cancer detection rate, sensitivity, recall rate, biopsy rate, and positive predictive value of biopsy for combined screening with mammography plus ultrasound versus mammography alone. Results: The overall sensitivity of mammography only was 61.5% in women with dense breasts and 86.6% in women with non-dense breasts. The sensitivity of mammography plus ultrasound combined was 81.3% in women with dense breasts and 95.0% in women with non-dense breasts. Adjunctive ultrasound increased the recall rate from 10.5 to 16.5 per 1000 women screened, and increased the biopsy rate from 6.3 to 9.3 per 1000 women screened. The positive predictive value of biopsy was 55.5% (95% CI 50.6%-60.3%) for mammography alone and 43.3 (95% CI 39.4%-47.3%) for combined mammography plus ultrasound. Conclusions: Supplemental ultrasound improves cancer detection in screening of women at average risk for breast cancer. Recall rates and biopsy rates can be kept within acceptable limits.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 29
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MRI of the Breast as Part of the Assessment in Population-Based Mammography Screening
    Bick, U.
    Engelken, F.
    Diederichs, G.
    Dzyuballa, R.
    Ortmann, M.
    Fallenberg, E. M.
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2013, 185 (09): : 849 - 856
  • [42] Utilization of screening mammography in New Hampshire - A population-based assessment
    Carney, PA
    Goodrich, ME
    MacKenzie, T
    Weiss, JE
    Poplack, SP
    Wells, WS
    Titus-Ernstoff, L
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 104 (08) : 1726 - 1732
  • [43] Viewpoint: It is time to reconsider policy for population-based mammography screening
    Anne J Kearney
    [J]. Journal of Public Health Policy, 2015, 36 : 259 - 269
  • [44] Implementation of Digital Mammography in a Population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program: Effect of Screening Round on Recall Rate and Cancer Detection
    Sala, Maria
    Comas, Merce
    Macia, Francesc
    Martinez, Juan
    Casamitjana, Montserrat
    Castells, Xavier
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 252 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [45] Screening history in women with cervical cancer in a Danish population-based screening program
    Kirschner, Benny
    Poll, Susanne
    Rygaard, Carsten
    Wahlin, Anne
    Junge, Jette
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 120 (01) : 68 - 72
  • [46] The outcome of a quality-controlled mammography screening program: Experience from a population-based study in Taiwan
    Pan, Huay-Ben
    Wong, Kam-Fai
    Yang, Tsung-Lung
    Hsu, Giu-Cheng
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    Huang, Jer-Shyung
    Lee, San-Kan
    Chou, Yi-Hong
    Chiang, Chia-Ling
    Liang, Huei-Lung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 77 (10) : 531 - 534
  • [47] Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program
    Zuckerman, Samantha P.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Keller, Brad M.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    Barufaldi, Bruno
    Weinstein, Susan P.
    Synnestvedt, Marie
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 281 (03) : 730 - 736
  • [48] Radiologic findings of screen-detected cancers in an organized population-based screening mammography program in Turkey
    Kayhan, Arda
    Aribal, Erkin
    Sahin, Cennet
    Tasci, Omur Can
    Gurdal, Sibel Ozkan
    Ozturk, Enis
    Hatipoglu, Hayat Halide
    Ozaydin, Nilufer
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    Ozcinar, Beyza
    Ozmen, Vahit
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 22 (06) : 508 - 513
  • [49] Evaluation of a mammography screening program within the population-based Vorarlberg Health Monitoring & Prevention Program (VHM&PP)
    Nagel, Gabriele
    Oberaigner, Willi
    Peter, Raphael S.
    Ulmer, Hanno
    Concin, Hans
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 812 - 818
  • [50] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Hovda, Tone
    Holen, Asne S.
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Albertsen, Judy
    Bjorndal, Hilde
    Brandal, Siri H. B.
    Gullien, Randi
    Lomo, Jon
    Park, Daehoon
    Romundstad, Linda
    Suhrke, Pal
    Vigeland, Einar
    Skaane, Per
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (03) : 787 - 794