Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program

被引:48
|
作者
Buchberger, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
Geiger-Gritsch, Sabine [2 ,3 ]
Knapp, Rudolf [4 ]
Gautsch, Kurt [5 ]
Oberaigner, Willi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tirol Kliniken Ltd, Med Dept, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth, Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Technol Assessment, Eduard Wallnofer Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall In Tirol, Austria
[3] Tirol Kliniken Ltd, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Kufstein Cty Hosp, Dept Radiol, Endachstr 27, A-6330 Kufstein, Austria
[5] Innsbruck Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Mammography; Ultrasound; Breast density; Sensitivity; Specificity; INTERVAL BREAST CANCERS; DENSE BREASTS; WOMEN; SONOGRAPHY; US; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the performance of screening with mammography combined with ultrasound versus mammography alone in women at average risk for breast cancer. Methods: 66,680 women underwent physician-performed ultrasound as an adjunct to screening mammography. Histological results and follow-up at one year were used as reference standard for sensitivity. Main outcome measures were cancer detection rate, sensitivity, recall rate, biopsy rate, and positive predictive value of biopsy for combined screening with mammography plus ultrasound versus mammography alone. Results: The overall sensitivity of mammography only was 61.5% in women with dense breasts and 86.6% in women with non-dense breasts. The sensitivity of mammography plus ultrasound combined was 81.3% in women with dense breasts and 95.0% in women with non-dense breasts. Adjunctive ultrasound increased the recall rate from 10.5 to 16.5 per 1000 women screened, and increased the biopsy rate from 6.3 to 9.3 per 1000 women screened. The positive predictive value of biopsy was 55.5% (95% CI 50.6%-60.3%) for mammography alone and 43.3 (95% CI 39.4%-47.3%) for combined mammography plus ultrasound. Conclusions: Supplemental ultrasound improves cancer detection in screening of women at average risk for breast cancer. Recall rates and biopsy rates can be kept within acceptable limits.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 29
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Population-based service mammography screening: the Icelandic experience
    Sigurdsson, Kristjan
    Olafsdottir, Elinborg Jona
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2013, 5 : 17 - 25
  • [22] Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study
    Nederend, J.
    Duijm, L. E. M.
    Louwman, M. W. J.
    Groenewoud, J. H.
    Donkers-van Rossum, A. B.
    Voogd, A. C.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (12) : 3098 - 3103
  • [23] Psychosocial factors and attendance at a population-based mammography screening program in a cohort of Swedish women
    Lagerlund, Magdalena
    Sontrop, Jessica M.
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [24] Sociodemographic Determinants of Nonattendance in a Population-Based Mammography Screening Program in the City of Manisa, Turkey
    Dundar, Pinar Erbay
    Ozyurt, Beyhan Cengiz
    Erdurak, Koray
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012, : 1 - 14
  • [25] Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program
    Lagerlund, M
    Hedin, A
    Sparén, P
    Thurfjell, E
    Lambe, M
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 31 (04) : 417 - 428
  • [26] Psychosocial factors and attendance at a population-based mammography screening program in a cohort of Swedish women
    Magdalena Lagerlund
    Jessica M Sontrop
    Sophia Zackrisson
    BMC Women's Health, 14
  • [27] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY IN A BREAST CANCER POPULATION-BASED SCREENING PROGRAM
    Comas, M.
    Arrospide, A.
    Mar, J.
    Roman, R.
    Sala, M.
    Hernandez, C.
    Castells, X.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A270 - A270
  • [28] Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program
    Tone Hovda
    Siri H. B. Brandal
    Sofie Sebuødegård
    Åsne S. Holen
    Hilde Bjørndal
    Per Skaane
    Solveig Hofvind
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 6991 - 6999
  • [29] Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program
    Hovda, Tone
    Brandal, Siri H. B.
    Sebuadegard, Sofie
    Holen, Asne S.
    Bjorndal, Hilde
    Skaane, Per
    Hofvind, Solveig
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 6991 - 6999
  • [30] Breast tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program
    Taourel, Patrice
    Millet, Ingrid
    Verheyden, Cecile
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2016, 26 (3-4) : 178 - 180