Perioperative Outcomes of Single vs Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Experience

被引:42
|
作者
Saidian, Ava [1 ]
Fang, Andrew M. [1 ]
Hakim, Ornin [2 ]
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina [3 ]
Nix, Jeffrey W. [1 ,4 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] UAB, ONeal Comprehens Canc Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2020年 / 204卷 / 03期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; robotic surgical procedures; minimally invasive surgical procedures;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000811
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical approach to radical prostatectomy has evolved due to advances in minimally invasive surgery, with most contemporary approaches involving the Si or Xi multi-port robotic systems. U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the single-port da Vinci (R) SP robotic platform has led to a few case series suggesting its safety and feasibility for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. However, there are no established data on perioperative outcomes comparing single-port to multi-port robotic approaches to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by 2 urological surgeons at our institution between October 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The available preoperative clinical and demographic data, operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed using the t-test, chi-square and Fisher exact statistical measures. Results: Overall 95 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution were included in our study, with 47 single-port and 48 multi-port. Preoperative clinical parameters including age, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery and biopsy grade group were similar across the 2 groups. No differences in estimated blood loss (169.2 +/- 114.2 vs 157.7 +/- 125.4 ml, p=0.64), operative time (255.9 +/- 44.1 vs 274.7 +/- 50.4 minutes, p=0.06), length of hospitalization (1.1 +/- 0.5 vs 1.4 +/- 1.1 days, p=0.17), rate of perioperative inpatient Clavien-Dindo complications 2 or greater (4.3% vs 6.3% p=0.66) and rate of positive pathological margin (21.3% vs 27.1%, p=0.51) were noted comparing the single-port and multi-port approaches, respectively. Conclusions: The single-port robotic system allows a feasible approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and has operative and perioperative outcomes comparable to those of the well accepted multi-port robotic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 495
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform
    Daniel J. Lama
    Kyle Thomas
    Simone L. Vernez
    Oluwatimilehin Okunowo
    Clayton S. Lau
    Bertram E. Yuh
    BMC Urology, 24
  • [32] Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform
    Lama, Daniel J.
    Thomas, Kyle
    Vernez, Simone L.
    Okunowo, Oluwatimilehin
    Lau, Clayton S.
    Yuh, Bertram E.
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [33] Robotic assisted vs standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon analysis of outcomes
    Threadgate, M.
    Hoag, C.
    Moon, D. A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 : 9 - 9
  • [34] SINGLE PORT ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: INITIAL EXPERIENCE AND TECHNIQUE AT NORTHWELL HEALTH
    Meyer, Alexa
    Telis, Leon
    Zhang, Bertie
    Winoker, Jared
    Feuerstein, Michael
    Bishoff, Jay
    Schwartz, Michael
    Vira, Manish
    Kavoussi, Louis
    Richstone, Lee
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E658 - E659
  • [35] Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Transvesical Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Technical Description and Perioperative Outcomes
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Ferguson, Ethan L.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Geskin, Albert
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (09) : 1001 - 1011
  • [36] COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT AND MULTI-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY: A REPORT OF THE SINGLE PORT ADVANCED RESEARCH CONSORTIUM (SPARC)
    Okhawere, Kennedy E.
    Saini, Indu
    Sauer, Ruben Calvo
    Zuluaga, Laura
    Raver, Michael
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Wang, Yuzhi
    Noel, Onika
    Upcinar, Burak
    Lorenzo, Juan V.
    Eun, Daniel D.
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Porter, James
    Abaza, Ronney
    Mansour, Ahmed M.
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Pierorazio, Phillip
    Singla, Nirmish
    Rogers, Craig
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Stifelman, Michael
    Mehrazin, Reza
    Badani, Ketan K.
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E738 - E738
  • [37] MATCHED ANALYSIS OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN EXTRAPERITONEAL SINGLE PORT AND INTRAPERITONEAL MULTIPORT PROSTATECTOMY: A SINGLE-INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE
    Harrison, Robert
    Stifelman, Michael
    Billah, Shabil
    Lulla, Tina
    Lovallo, Greg
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E894 - E894
  • [38] Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of Single-Port vs Multiport Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Kunpeng
    Yu, Xiaodong
    Yang, Xuesong
    Huang, Jing
    Deng, Xianzhong
    Su, Zhongsan
    Wang, Chunli
    Wu, Tao
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (01) : 83 - 98
  • [39] OUTPATIENT EXPERIENCE WITH EXTRAPERITONEAL SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Wilson, Clark
    Garisto, Juan
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1134 - E1134
  • [40] Peri-operative outcomes of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon experience
    Shah, Ketul K.
    Thaly, Rahul K.
    Patel, Vipul R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 525 - 525