Perioperative Outcomes of Single vs Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Experience

被引:42
|
作者
Saidian, Ava [1 ]
Fang, Andrew M. [1 ]
Hakim, Ornin [2 ]
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina [3 ]
Nix, Jeffrey W. [1 ,4 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] UAB, ONeal Comprehens Canc Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2020年 / 204卷 / 03期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; robotic surgical procedures; minimally invasive surgical procedures;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000811
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical approach to radical prostatectomy has evolved due to advances in minimally invasive surgery, with most contemporary approaches involving the Si or Xi multi-port robotic systems. U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the single-port da Vinci (R) SP robotic platform has led to a few case series suggesting its safety and feasibility for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. However, there are no established data on perioperative outcomes comparing single-port to multi-port robotic approaches to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by 2 urological surgeons at our institution between October 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The available preoperative clinical and demographic data, operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed using the t-test, chi-square and Fisher exact statistical measures. Results: Overall 95 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution were included in our study, with 47 single-port and 48 multi-port. Preoperative clinical parameters including age, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery and biopsy grade group were similar across the 2 groups. No differences in estimated blood loss (169.2 +/- 114.2 vs 157.7 +/- 125.4 ml, p=0.64), operative time (255.9 +/- 44.1 vs 274.7 +/- 50.4 minutes, p=0.06), length of hospitalization (1.1 +/- 0.5 vs 1.4 +/- 1.1 days, p=0.17), rate of perioperative inpatient Clavien-Dindo complications 2 or greater (4.3% vs 6.3% p=0.66) and rate of positive pathological margin (21.3% vs 27.1%, p=0.51) were noted comparing the single-port and multi-port approaches, respectively. Conclusions: The single-port robotic system allows a feasible approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and has operative and perioperative outcomes comparable to those of the well accepted multi-port robotic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 495
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perioperative Complications of Single-Port and Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-Institutional Comparison Analysis
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Mikesell, Carter
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2024, 38 (05) : 450 - 457
  • [22] Technical advancements in robotic prostatectomy: single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and single-port transperineal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 848 - 855
  • [23] SINGLE-PORT EXTRAPERITONEAL ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL COHORT STUDY
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Morgantini, Luca
    Talamini, Susan
    Joseph, Jean
    Kim, Moses
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E984 - E985
  • [24] Comment on "Postoperative Outcomes and Analgesic Requirements of Single-Port vs Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy" by Fang, et al.
    Jiao, Hong-wei
    Feng, Xiao-yue
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2024,
  • [25] Early outcomes of single-site versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuan, Jiazheng
    He, Qinyu
    Zheng, Yang
    Lv, Qian
    Hu, Xu
    Wang, Dong
    Tian, Jingzhi
    Ren, Shangqing
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (01):
  • [26] Surgical Technique and Perioperative Outcomes Following Single-Port Robotic Adrenalectomy: A Single Institutional Experience
    Rudnick, Benjamin
    Billah, Mubashir Shabil
    Nguyen, Jennifer
    Sheckley, Fahad
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2024, 38 (04) : 353 - 357
  • [27] Initial experience on extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Chang, Yi-Fan
    Gu, Di
    Mei, Ni
    Xu, Wei-Dong
    Lu, Xiao-Jun
    Xiao, Yu-Tian
    Xu, Chuan-Liang
    Sun, Ying-Hao
    Ren, Shan-Cheng
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (02) : 231 - 233
  • [28] Initial experience on extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Chang Yi-Fan
    Gu Di
    Mei Ni
    Xu Wei-Dong
    Lu Xiao-Jun
    Xiao Yu-Tian
    Xu Chuan-Liang
    Sun Ying-Hao
    Ren Shan-Cheng
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2021, 134 (02) : 231 - 233
  • [29] SINGLE PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Goel, R.
    White, W.
    Haber, G.
    Crouzet, S.
    Kaouk, J.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A299 - A299
  • [30] Extraperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Single Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes
    Chen, I-Hsuan Alan
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (06): : 1140 - 1140