Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform

被引:0
|
作者
Lama, Daniel J. [1 ]
Thomas, Kyle [1 ]
Vernez, Simone L. [1 ]
Okunowo, Oluwatimilehin [2 ]
Lau, Clayton S. [1 ]
Yuh, Bertram E. [1 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Urol & Urol Oncol, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] Beckman Res Inst City Hope, Dept Computat & Quantitat Med, Div Biostat, Duarte, CA USA
关键词
Cytoreduction; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Prostate-specific antigen; Robotic surgical procedures; CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-024-01463-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Consolidative resection or cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (CRP) may benefit men with non-organ confined prostate cancer. We report the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic CRP using a single-port (SP) or multi-port (MP) platform. Methods We reviewed consecutive men with clinical node positive or metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer who underwent IRB-approved CRP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection using the da Vinci SP or MP Surgical Systems (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) from 2015-2022. Perioperative data and Clavien-Dindo 90-day complications were recorded. Results Twenty-four men with a median age of 61 (IQR 56-69) years and prostate-specific antigen of 32.1 (IQR 21.9-62.3) ng/mL were included. Clinical N1, M1, or N1 + M1 disease were detected in 8 (33%), 9 (38%), 7 (29%) patients, respectively. There was no difference in positive margins, 41% vs. 29% (P = 0.67), lymph node yield, 21 (IQR 14-28) vs. 20 (IQR 13.5-21) nodes (P = 0.31), or estimated blood loss, 150 mL (IQR 100-200) vs. 50 mL (IQR 50-125) (P = 0.06), between the MP and SP cohorts, respectively. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for the SP group, same-day discharge (IQR 0-0), compared to MP, 1-day (IQR 1-1), P < 0.001. One grade III bowel obstruction and lymphocele occurred in the MP cohort. No major complications occurred in the SP cohort. Conclusion Robot-assisted laparoscopic CRP is safe and feasible for select men with advanced castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform
    Daniel J. Lama
    Kyle Thomas
    Simone L. Vernez
    Oluwatimilehin Okunowo
    Clayton S. Lau
    Bertram E. Yuh
    [J]. BMC Urology, 24
  • [2] Comparison of single-port and multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?
    Li, Jinze
    Cao, Dehong
    Huang, Yin
    Wei, Qiang
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2022, 11 (06) : 906 - 907
  • [3] A reply letter for comparison of single-port and multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?
    Wei, Yong
    Ji, Qianying
    Zuo, Wenren
    Wang, Shiyan
    Wang, Xinyi
    Zhu, Qingyi
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2022, 11 (06) : 908 - 909
  • [4] PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF SINGLE-PORT AND MULTI-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A SINGLE-INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISON ANALYSIS
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Mikesell, Carter
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E604 - E604
  • [5] PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT AND MULTI-PORT ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE
    Saidian, Ava
    Fang, Andrew
    Hakim, Ornin
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E900 - E901
  • [6] Patient Satisfaction with Single-Port vs Multi-Port Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies
    Perlin, Lauren
    Fisher, Jay
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 188S - 189S
  • [7] SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    White, Michael A.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Khanna, Rakesh
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Forest, Sylvain
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E188 - E188
  • [8] Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and "Multi-Port" Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where do we stand?
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Garisto, Juan
    Bove, Pierluigi
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Rocco, Bernardo
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2021, 155 : 138 - 143
  • [9] Comparing the Incidence of Incisional Hernia after Single-Port vs Multi-Port Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Norton, John C.
    Compher, Tyler
    Burns, Zachary R.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Parmar, Abhishek
    Rais-bahrami, Soroush
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 237 (05) : S577 - S577
  • [10] Technical advancements in robotic prostatectomy: single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and single-port transperineal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 848 - 855