Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China

被引:6
|
作者
Wu, Huijun [1 ]
Liu, Yongxin [1 ]
Dai, Chengjuan [1 ]
Ye, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Zhu, Huimin [1 ]
Fang, Weixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Earth & Environm, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Pig production system; Domestic breeding; Scale breeding; Environmental management; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY; EMERGY ANALYSIS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CROP PRODUCTION; LAND-USE; PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; POULTRY PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32541-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China, the world's largest consumer and producer of pork in the world, is attracting increasing attention due to the environmental impacts of its pig production. Previous studies seldom comprehensively compare the environmental impacts of the pig production system with different models, resulting in different intensities of environmental impacts. We aim to comprehensively evaluate Chinese pig production with different breeding models and explore a more sustainable way for pig production. We use life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate and compare environmental impacts of pig production system with four main breeding models in China from 1998 to 2020: domestic breeding, small-scale breeding, medium-scale breeding, and large-scale breeding. The life cycle encompasses fertilizer production, feed production, feed processing, pig raising, waste treatment, and slaughtering. The impact categories including energy consumption (EN), global warming (GWP), acidification (AP), eutrophication (EU), water use (WD), and land occupation (LO) are expressed with "100 kg live weight of fattening pig at farm gate." The results show that driven by governmental support, growing meat demand, and cost advantage, the scale breeding especially large-scale breeding simultaneously yielded greater net economic benefit and less environmental impact compared to other breeding models especially the domestic breeding. Due to mineral fertilizer application, feed production contributed over 50% of the total environmental impacts. Notably, the composition of feeds exerted significant influence on the environmental impacts arising from fertilizer production and feed processing. Furthermore, attributable to the substantial use of electricity and heat, as well as the concomitant emissions, pig raising contributed the largest GWP, while ranking second in terms of AP and EU. Notably, waste management constituted the third-largest EU, AP, and WD. In addition to promote scale breeding, we put forth several sustainable measures encompassing feed composition, cultivation practices, fertilizer utilization, and waste management for consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:21668 / 21686
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle assessment of apple production and consumption under different sales models in China
    Cheng, Juanjuan
    Yu, Jin
    Tan, Dejun
    Wang, Qian
    Zhao, Zhengyang
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2025, 55 : 100 - 116
  • [42] A Life Cycle Assessment Study of the Impacts of Pig Breeding on the Environmental Sustainability of Pig Production
    Thoma, Greg J.
    Baker, Banks
    Knap, Pieter W.
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (16):
  • [43] Mitigating life-cycle environmental impacts and increasing net ecosystem economic benefits via optimized fertilization combined with lime in pomelo production in Southeast China
    Yan, Xiaojun
    Ma, Yifei
    Kong, Kunpeng
    Muneer, Muhammad Atif
    Zhang, Lijun
    Zhang, Yadong
    Cheng, Zhihan
    Luo, Ziwei
    Ma, Changcheng
    Zheng, Chaoyuan
    Yang, Wenhao
    Guo, Jiuxin
    Su, Da
    Wu, Liangquan
    Li, Chunjian
    Zhang, Fusuo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 912
  • [44] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of lead refining in China
    Jingmin Hong
    Zhaohe Yu
    Wenxiao Shi
    Jinglan Hong
    Congcong Qi
    Liping Ye
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 909 - 918
  • [45] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of Phosphogypsum utilization in China
    Chen, Lu
    Luan, Xiaoyu
    Han, Feng
    Zhao, Yuwei
    Yang, Huiying
    Zhang, Long
    Yin, Yongquan
    Liu, Wei
    Cui, Zhaojie
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2025, 212
  • [46] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of lead refining in China
    Hong, Jingmin
    Yu, Zhaohe
    Shi, Wenxiao
    Hong, Jinglan
    Qi, Congcong
    Ye, Liping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (06): : 909 - 918
  • [47] Quantifying the life-cycle environmental profile of photovoltaics and comparisons with other electricity-generating technologies
    Fthenakis, V. M.
    Kim, H. C.
    CONFERENCE RECORD OF THE 2006 IEEE 4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY CONVERSION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 2477 - +
  • [48] Preliminary analysis on economic and environmental consequences of grain production on different farm sizes in North China Plain
    Wang, Xiaolong
    Chen, Yuanquan
    Sui, Peng
    Yan, Peng
    Yang, Xiaolei
    Gao, Wangsheng
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 153 : 181 - 189
  • [49] The Life-Cycle Environmental Impact of Recycling of Restaurant Food Waste in Lanzhou, China
    Zhang, Zilong
    Han, Wenyan
    Chen, Xingpeng
    Yang, Na
    Lu, Chenyu
    Wang, Yueju
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (17):
  • [50] Environmental life-cycle impacts of bitumen: Systematic review and new Canadian models
    de Bortoli, Anne
    Rahimy, Olutoyin
    Levasseur, Annie
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 136