Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China

被引:6
|
作者
Wu, Huijun [1 ]
Liu, Yongxin [1 ]
Dai, Chengjuan [1 ]
Ye, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Zhu, Huimin [1 ]
Fang, Weixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Earth & Environm, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Pig production system; Domestic breeding; Scale breeding; Environmental management; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY; EMERGY ANALYSIS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CROP PRODUCTION; LAND-USE; PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; POULTRY PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32541-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China, the world's largest consumer and producer of pork in the world, is attracting increasing attention due to the environmental impacts of its pig production. Previous studies seldom comprehensively compare the environmental impacts of the pig production system with different models, resulting in different intensities of environmental impacts. We aim to comprehensively evaluate Chinese pig production with different breeding models and explore a more sustainable way for pig production. We use life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate and compare environmental impacts of pig production system with four main breeding models in China from 1998 to 2020: domestic breeding, small-scale breeding, medium-scale breeding, and large-scale breeding. The life cycle encompasses fertilizer production, feed production, feed processing, pig raising, waste treatment, and slaughtering. The impact categories including energy consumption (EN), global warming (GWP), acidification (AP), eutrophication (EU), water use (WD), and land occupation (LO) are expressed with "100 kg live weight of fattening pig at farm gate." The results show that driven by governmental support, growing meat demand, and cost advantage, the scale breeding especially large-scale breeding simultaneously yielded greater net economic benefit and less environmental impact compared to other breeding models especially the domestic breeding. Due to mineral fertilizer application, feed production contributed over 50% of the total environmental impacts. Notably, the composition of feeds exerted significant influence on the environmental impacts arising from fertilizer production and feed processing. Furthermore, attributable to the substantial use of electricity and heat, as well as the concomitant emissions, pig raising contributed the largest GWP, while ranking second in terms of AP and EU. Notably, waste management constituted the third-largest EU, AP, and WD. In addition to promote scale breeding, we put forth several sustainable measures encompassing feed composition, cultivation practices, fertilizer utilization, and waste management for consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:21668 / 21686
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring the life-cycle environmental and economic performance of concrete: The BEES approach
    Lippiatt, BC
    Ahmad, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY, 2004, : 213 - 230
  • [22] Life-cycle economic and environmental assessment of warm stone mastic asphalt
    Leng, Zhen
    Al-Qadi, Imad L.
    Cao, Ruijun
    TRANSPORTMETRICA A-TRANSPORT SCIENCE, 2018, 14 (07) : 562 - 575
  • [23] Evaluating environmental impacts of pig slurry treatment technologies with a life-cycle perspective
    Yuan, Zengwei
    Pan, Xiao
    Chen, Tianming
    Liu, Xuewei
    Zhang, You
    Jiang, Songyan
    Sheng, Hu
    Zhang, Ling
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 840 - 850
  • [24] The original sin: Firms' dynamics and the life-cycle consequences of economic conditions at birth
    Cavallari, Lilia
    Romano, Simone
    Naticchioni, Paolo
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 138
  • [25] Life-cycle consequences of internalising socio-environmental externalities of power generation
    Garcia-Gusano, Diego
    Robert Istrate, I.
    Iribarren, Diego
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 612 : 386 - 391
  • [26] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of ceramic tile production: A case study in China
    Ye, Liping
    Hong, Jinglan
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Qi, Congcong
    Yang, Donglu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 189 : 432 - 441
  • [27] Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment of Different Biogas and Biogas Residue Operation Models
    Guan, Jinghua
    Li, Ningzhou
    Li, Haiying
    Yao, Xin
    Long, Yue
    Wang, Shaolong
    Ji, Aimin
    Xue, Yuekai
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [28] The economic theory of environmental Life Cycle Inventory models
    Pento, T
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 3 : 103 - 112
  • [29] Life-cycle energy and economic analysis of sweet sorghum ethanol in China
    Gao, Hui
    Hu, Shanying
    Li, Yourun
    Chen, Dingjiang
    Zhu, Bing
    Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2010, 50 (11): : 1858 - 1863
  • [30] Life-cycle environmental impact analysis of a typical cement production chain
    Song, Dan
    Yang, Jin
    Chen, Bin
    Hayat, Tasawar
    Alsaedi, Ahmed
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 164 : 916 - 923