Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China

被引:6
|
作者
Wu, Huijun [1 ]
Liu, Yongxin [1 ]
Dai, Chengjuan [1 ]
Ye, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Zhu, Huimin [1 ]
Fang, Weixin [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Earth & Environm, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Pig production system; Domestic breeding; Scale breeding; Environmental management; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCY; EMERGY ANALYSIS; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CROP PRODUCTION; LAND-USE; PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; POULTRY PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-024-32541-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China, the world's largest consumer and producer of pork in the world, is attracting increasing attention due to the environmental impacts of its pig production. Previous studies seldom comprehensively compare the environmental impacts of the pig production system with different models, resulting in different intensities of environmental impacts. We aim to comprehensively evaluate Chinese pig production with different breeding models and explore a more sustainable way for pig production. We use life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate and compare environmental impacts of pig production system with four main breeding models in China from 1998 to 2020: domestic breeding, small-scale breeding, medium-scale breeding, and large-scale breeding. The life cycle encompasses fertilizer production, feed production, feed processing, pig raising, waste treatment, and slaughtering. The impact categories including energy consumption (EN), global warming (GWP), acidification (AP), eutrophication (EU), water use (WD), and land occupation (LO) are expressed with "100 kg live weight of fattening pig at farm gate." The results show that driven by governmental support, growing meat demand, and cost advantage, the scale breeding especially large-scale breeding simultaneously yielded greater net economic benefit and less environmental impact compared to other breeding models especially the domestic breeding. Due to mineral fertilizer application, feed production contributed over 50% of the total environmental impacts. Notably, the composition of feeds exerted significant influence on the environmental impacts arising from fertilizer production and feed processing. Furthermore, attributable to the substantial use of electricity and heat, as well as the concomitant emissions, pig raising contributed the largest GWP, while ranking second in terms of AP and EU. Notably, waste management constituted the third-largest EU, AP, and WD. In addition to promote scale breeding, we put forth several sustainable measures encompassing feed composition, cultivation practices, fertilizer utilization, and waste management for consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:21668 / 21686
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life-cycle assessment as an environmental management tool in the production of potable water
    Friedrich, E
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (09) : 29 - 36
  • [32] Environmental life-cycle assessment of waste-coal pellets production
    Hanak, Dawid P.
    CLEAN ENERGY, 2022, 6 (01): : 765 - 778
  • [33] A life-cycle comparison of the energy, environmental and economic impacts of coal versus wood pellets for generating heat in China
    Wang, Changbo
    Chang, Yuan
    Zhang, Lixiao
    Pang, Mingyue
    Hao, Yan
    ENERGY, 2017, 120 : 374 - 384
  • [34] PROCESS OF LIFE-CYCLE COST-ANALYSIS - PROJECTING ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF DESIGN DECISIONS
    不详
    AIA JOURNAL-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1976, 65 (11): : 72 - 73
  • [35] Life-cycle environmental and economic benefits of jointless bridges considering climate change
    Shi, Chengcheng
    Wang, Yuanfeng
    Chen, Baochun
    Liu, Yinshan
    Li, Kai
    Luo, Wei
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2023, 19 (06) : 745 - 759
  • [36] Environmental and Economic Prioritization of Building Energy Refurbishment Strategies with Life-Cycle Approach
    Oregi, Xabat
    Javier Hernandez, Rufino
    Hernandez, Patxi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [37] Life-cycle assessment for coal-based methanol production in China
    Li, Changhang
    Bai, Hongtao
    Lu, Yuanye
    Bian, Jinghong
    Dong, Yan
    Xu, He
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 1004 - 1017
  • [38] Integrating Life-cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment with Transportation and Land Use Planning
    Chester, Mikhail V.
    Nahik, Matthew J.
    Fraser, Andrew M.
    Kimball, Mindy A.
    Garikapati, Venu M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (21) : 12020 - 12028
  • [39] Environmental and economic benefits of optimal insulation thickness: A life-cycle cost analysis
    Annibaldi, V
    Cucchiella, F.
    De Berardinis, P.
    Rotilio, M.
    Stornelli, V
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 116
  • [40] Life-Cycle analysis of economic and environmental effects for electric bus transit systems
    Pei, Mingyang
    Hu, Yi
    Han, Weiji
    Qu, Xiaobo
    Zou, Changfu
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 131