Online focus groups as a tool to study policy professionals

被引:2
|
作者
Berkhout, Joost [1 ]
Crepaz, Michele [2 ]
Hanegraaff, Marcel [1 ]
Junk, Wiebke Marie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, NL-1012 DL Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Hist Anthropol Philosophy & Polit, Belfast, North Ireland
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Polit Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
focus groups; interview methods; political elites; lobbyists; policymakers; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1177/20531680231211398
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Scholars interested in political elites and policy professionals only sporadically rely on focus group methods. In this article, we argue why this is a missed opportunity. Based on our own recent research experience, we suggest three innovations to the focus group method that should make it appealing for political scientists who study professionals active in the policy process. First, focus groups allow for the study of the interactions between political elites in ways other methods cannot. Second, the method can be used for hypothesis testing when focus groups are designed accordingly. Third, the option to conduct focus groups online has major advantages in terms of participant costs, ease of recruitment, and, potentially, research equity. We hope that our suggestions are useful for researchers wanting to build on any one-or all-of these innovations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Why parents refuse childhood vaccination: a qualitative study using online focus groups
    Irene A Harmsen
    Liesbeth Mollema
    Robert AC Ruiter
    Theo GW Paulussen
    Hester E de Melker
    Gerjo Kok
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 13
  • [22] Why parents refuse childhood vaccination: a qualitative study using online focus groups
    Harmsen, Irene A.
    Mollema, Liesbeth
    Ruiter, Robert A. C.
    Paulussen, Theo G. W.
    de Melker, Hester E.
    Kok, Gerjo
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [23] Premises and experiences: the analysis of online focus groups execution
    Parada Duenas, Francisco Javier
    [J]. ENCRUCIJADAS-REVISTA CRITICA DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES, 2012, 4 : 95 - 114
  • [24] Simulated jury decision making in online focus groups
    Tabak, Samantha J.
    Klettke, Bianca
    Knight, Tess
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (01) : 102 - +
  • [25] Using Message Boards to Conduct Online Focus Groups
    Deggs, David
    Grover, Kenda
    Kacirek, Kit
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2010, 15 (04) : 1027 - 1036
  • [26] Online Focus Groups with and for the Elderly: Specifics, Challenges, Recommendations
    Rietze, Jessica
    Buerkner, Isabell
    Blum, Rainer
    Pfister, Anne
    [J]. MENSCH AND COMPUTER 2021 (MUC 21), 2021, : 194 - 198
  • [27] Considerations for conducting online focus groups on sensitive topics
    Samardzic, Tanja
    Wildman, Christine
    Barata, Paula C.
    Morton, Mavis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2024, 27 (04) : 485 - 490
  • [28] A Guide to Conducting Online Focus Groups via Reddit
    Richard, Brendan
    Sivo, Stephen A.
    Ford, Robert C.
    Murphy, Jamie
    Boote, David N.
    Witta, Eleanor
    Orlowski, Marissa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2021, 20
  • [29] Online focus groups: a valuable alternative for hospitality research?
    Richard, Brendan
    Sivo, Stephen
    Orlowski, Marissa
    Ford, Robert
    Murphy, Jamie
    Boote, David
    Witta, Eleanor
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 30 (11) : 3175 - 3191
  • [30] Using focus groups as a tool to develop a hospitality work-life research study
    O'Neill, John W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 24 (06) : 873 - 885