Premises and experiences: the analysis of online focus groups execution

被引:0
|
作者
Parada Duenas, Francisco Javier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
uncertainty; online focus group; premises; experiences;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The requirement to set aside the certainty as knowledge generator, which prevents thinking, opens the way toward thinking about focus groups. Taking on this posture, we can realize that there are differences, in terms of execution, between online and offline discussion groups. Are arising here five premises about online focus groups deferring with regard to the working of offline focus groups: participants are aware that the expressivity remains text-only limited; the first self-management goes through the avatar choice; the mediator/researcher's need to be considerably present; having fewer participants to reduce communicational schizophrenia; and a short duration necessity. With analyzing these five premises, it's being necessary to set out empirical examples of online focus groups' execution, focusing on the analysis of theirs interactive dynamics and the mediator/researcher's management. Both set up premises and experiences, open new uncertainties that should be thought about in the future. Issues such as: Do online focus groups implicate a reformulation in the process of the sociological discourse analysis? These reflections remain open.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 114
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Focus groups method: preparation, execution and analysis
    Dmitrieva, EV
    [J]. SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 1999, (08): : 133 - 138
  • [2] The analysis of interaction in online focus groups
    Watson, Mohinder
    Peacock, Susi
    Jones, Derek
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 13 (12): : 551 - 557
  • [3] Online Focus Groups
    Stewart, David W.
    Shamdasani, Prem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2017, 46 (01) : 48 - 60
  • [4] A critical comparison of offline focus groups, online focus groups and e-Delphi
    Brueggen, Elisabeth
    Willems, Pieter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2009, 51 (03) : 363 - 381
  • [5] Experiences in Online Process Groups: A Qualitative Study
    Kozlowski, Kelly A.
    Holmes, Courtney M.
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK, 2014, 39 (04): : 276 - 300
  • [6] Conducting Focus Groups: Experiences from Nursing Research
    Webb, Christine
    Doman, Maggie
    [J]. JUNCTURES-THE JOURNAL FOR THEMATIC DIALOGUE, 2008, (10): : 51 - 60
  • [7] Mentoring in the Time of COVID-19: An Analysis of Online Focus Groups with Mentors to Youth
    Kaufman, Michelle R.
    Wright, Kate
    Simon, Jeannette
    Edwards, Giselle
    Thrul, Johannes
    DuBois, David L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 69 (1-2) : 33 - 45
  • [8] A thematic analysis of students' discussions on death and body donation in international online focus groups
    Wu, Anette
    McWatt, Sean C.
    Utomo, Rachel
    Talis, Austin
    Xiao, Que Yun
    Saraci, Kerstin
    Brassett, Cecilia
    Sagoo, Mandeep Gill
    Wingate, Richard
    Chien, Chung-Liang
    Traxler, Hannes
    Waschke, Jens
    Vielmuth, Fransziska
    Sigmund, Anna
    Yamada, Yukari
    Sakurai, Takeshi
    Zeroual, Mina
    Olsen, Jorgen
    El-Batti, Salma
    Viranta-Kovanen, Suvi
    Keay, Kevin
    Stewart, William
    Mao, Yinghui
    Lang, Ariella
    Kunzel, Carol
    Bernd, Paulette
    Kielstein, Heike
    Noeel, Geoffroy P. J. C.
    [J]. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2023, 16 (04) : 768 - 784
  • [9] Simulated jury decision making in online focus groups
    Tabak, Samantha J.
    Klettke, Bianca
    Knight, Tess
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (01) : 102 - +
  • [10] Using Message Boards to Conduct Online Focus Groups
    Deggs, David
    Grover, Kenda
    Kacirek, Kit
    [J]. QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2010, 15 (04) : 1027 - 1036