Premises and experiences: the analysis of online focus groups execution

被引:0
|
作者
Parada Duenas, Francisco Javier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
uncertainty; online focus group; premises; experiences;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The requirement to set aside the certainty as knowledge generator, which prevents thinking, opens the way toward thinking about focus groups. Taking on this posture, we can realize that there are differences, in terms of execution, between online and offline discussion groups. Are arising here five premises about online focus groups deferring with regard to the working of offline focus groups: participants are aware that the expressivity remains text-only limited; the first self-management goes through the avatar choice; the mediator/researcher's need to be considerably present; having fewer participants to reduce communicational schizophrenia; and a short duration necessity. With analyzing these five premises, it's being necessary to set out empirical examples of online focus groups' execution, focusing on the analysis of theirs interactive dynamics and the mediator/researcher's management. Both set up premises and experiences, open new uncertainties that should be thought about in the future. Issues such as: Do online focus groups implicate a reformulation in the process of the sociological discourse analysis? These reflections remain open.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 114
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Profiling online consumers according to their experiences with a special focus on social dimension
    Dirsehan, Taskin
    Celik, Meltem
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 7TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2011, 24
  • [32] Experiences of the Health Examination for Asylum Seekers - Focus Groups with Refugees in Sweden
    Wangdahl, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 27
  • [33] Chiropractors and return to-work:: The experiences of three Canadian focus groups
    Côté, P
    Clarke, J
    Deguire, S
    Frank, JW
    Yassi, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 24 (05) : 309 - 316
  • [34] Sharing Experiences of Conducting Focus Groups With Populations Across the Healthcare Spectrum
    Lynch, Aileen
    Nicholl, Honor
    Tracey, Catherine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2016, 15 (01):
  • [35] Ethnic Variations in Dementia Caregiving Experiences: Insights from Focus Groups
    Vickrey, Barbara
    Strickland, Tony
    Fitten, L.
    Adams, Gloria
    Ortiz, Freddy
    Hays, Ron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR IN THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 15 (2-3) : 233 - 249
  • [36] Veterans' Civilian Employment Experiences: Lessons Learnt From Focus Groups
    Keeling, Mary Elizabeth
    Ozuna, Sara M.
    Kintzle, Sara
    Castro, Carl A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 46 (06) : 692 - 705
  • [37] Statistical focus on fires in retail premises in 2000
    Anon
    [J]. Fire Engineers Journal, 2002, 62 (219):
  • [38] Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: Methodological reflections
    Fox, Fiona E.
    Morris, Marianne
    Rumsey, Nichola
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2007, 17 (04) : 539 - 547
  • [39] Factors facilitating dementia case management: Results of online focus groups
    de Lange, Jacomine
    Deusing, Eline
    van Asch, Iris F. M.
    Peeters, Jose
    Zwaanswijk, Marieke
    Pot, Anne Margriet
    Francke, Anneke L.
    [J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 17 (01): : 110 - 125
  • [40] Reflecting on the opportunities and pitfalls of online focus groups for qualitative health research
    Fergie, Gillian
    Boydell-Wright, Nicola
    Hilton, Shona
    McDaid, Lisa M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2013, 12 : 704 - 705