Online focus groups: a valuable alternative for hospitality research?

被引:0
|
作者
Richard, Brendan [1 ]
Sivo, Stephen [1 ]
Orlowski, Marissa [2 ]
Ford, Robert [3 ]
Murphy, Jamie [4 ]
Boote, David [1 ]
Witta, Eleanor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Rosen Coll Hospitality, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Management, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Savonlinna, Finland
关键词
Focus groups; New product development; Sustainability; Qualitative methods; Idea generation; Crowdsourcing; FACE-TO-FACE; BRAINSTORMING GROUPS; SUSTAINABLE TOURISM; PRODUCTIVITY LOSS; TECHNOLOGY; IDEA; CREATIVITY; QUALITY; COMMUNICATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1108/IJCHM-11-2017-0715
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to test the idea generation capabilities of online text-based focus groups as compared to the traditional in-person focus groups using sustainability in the hospitality industry as the idea generation topic. Idea generation quantity and quality are analyzed and the theoretical and practical implications for the hospitality industry are discussed. Design/methodology/approach An experimental study tested the quality of ideas generated by online versus in-person focus groups. Participants were purposively sampled from the hospitality program at a large southeastern United States university and randomly assigned into one of two treatment groups: online text-based or traditional in-person focus groups. During both treatment groups participants generated ideas focused on sustainability in the hospitality industry. Findings The online focus group generated a comparable quantity of ideas, in addition to a similar average quality of ideas and number of good ideas. Practical implications The generation of ideas and the selection of opportunities drive the innovation process through which firms can strengthen their competitive advantage and maintain and grow market share and profitability. The results of this study may assist hospitality firms in determining which form of qualitative research delivers the highest return on investment by generating the best ideas at the lowest cost. Originality/value This paper breaks new ground by assessing the effectiveness of idea generation in online versus traditional focus groups, comparing both the quantity and quality of ideas generated from an experimental study that uses random assignment.
引用
收藏
页码:3175 / 3191
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Online Focus Groups
    Stewart, David W.
    Shamdasani, Prem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2017, 46 (01) : 48 - 60
  • [2] Focus groups as alternative research practice: Experience with transmigrants in Indonesia
    Goss, JD
    Leinbach, TR
    [J]. AREA, 1996, 28 (02) : 115 - 123
  • [3] Online focus groups: An effective method for qualitative research studies?
    Hughes, Jerald
    Lang, Karl R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODS IN BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, : 209 - 218
  • [4] Using focus groups as a tool to develop a hospitality work-life research study
    O'Neill, John W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 24 (06) : 873 - 885
  • [5] Reflecting on the opportunities and pitfalls of online focus groups for qualitative health research
    Fergie, Gillian
    Boydell-Wright, Nicola
    Hilton, Shona
    McDaid, Lisa M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2013, 12 : 704 - 705
  • [6] Absence, multiplicity and the boundaries of research? Reflections on online asynchronous focus groups
    Estrada-Jaramillo, Ana
    Michael, Mike
    Farrimond, Hannah
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (06) : 1669 - 1688
  • [7] Online Focus Groups via Message Boards - Chances for Qualitative Research
    Ullrich, Carsten G.
    Schiek, Daniela
    [J]. KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2014, 66 (03): : 459 - 474
  • [8] Methodological Reflections on the Use of Asynchronous Online Focus Groups in Health Research
    Williams, Sarah
    Clausen, Maria Giatsi
    Robertson, Ann
    Peacock, Susi
    McPherson, Kerri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2012, 11 (04): : 368 - 383
  • [9] Reflections on the Use of Synchronous Online Focus Groups in Social Care Research
    Keemink, Jolie R.
    Sharp, Rebecca J.
    Dargan, Alan K.
    Forder, Julien E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2022, 21
  • [10] Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned
    Gordon, Allegra R.
    Calzo, Jerel P.
    Eiduson, Rose
    Sharp, Kendall
    Silverstein, Scout
    Lopez, Ethan
    Thomson, Katharine
    Reisner, Sari L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2021, 20