Organ dose in CT: Comparison between measurements and computational methods

被引:2
|
作者
Pace, Martina [1 ]
Bonanno, Elisa [1 ]
Borzi, Giuseppina Rita [1 ]
Cavalli, Nina [1 ]
D'Anna, Alessia [2 ]
Gueli, Anna Maria [2 ]
Stella, Giuseppe [2 ]
Zirone, Lucia [1 ,2 ]
Marino, Camelo [1 ]
机构
[1] Human Ist Clin Catanese, Med Phys Dept, Misterbianco, CT, Italy
[2] Univ Catania, Dept Phys & Astron E Majorana, Catania, Italy
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2023年 / 112卷
关键词
DoseWatch TM; EBT-3; XR-QA2; Patient dosimetry; Diagnostic radiology; RADIOCHROMIC FILMS; DOSIMETRY; PROTOCOL; QUALITY; SCANNER; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102627
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study aims to compare two methods for the organ dose evaluation in computed tomography (CT) in the head- and thorax regions: an experimental method, using radiochromic films, and a computational one, using a commercial software.Methods: Gafchromic & REG; XR-QA2 and EBT-3 were characterized in terms of energetic, angular, and irradiation configurations dependence. Two free-in-air irradiation calibration configurations were employed using a CT scanner: with the sensitive surface of the film orthogonal (OC) and parallel (PC) to the beam axis. Different dose-response curves were obtained by varying the irradiation configurations and the beam quality (BQ). Subsequently, films were irradiated within an anthropomorphic phantom using CT-thorax and -head protocols, and the organ dose values obtained were compared with those provided by the commercial software.Results: At different configurations, an unchanged dose response was achieved with EBT-3, while a dose response of 15% was obtained with XR-QA2. By varying BQ, XR-QA2 showed a different response below 10%, while EBT-3 showed a variation below 5% for dose values >20 mGy. For films irradiation angle equal to 90 degrees, the normalized to 0 degrees relative response was 41% for the XR-QA2 model and 83% for the EBT-3 one. Organ dose values obtained with EBT-3 for both configurations and with XR-QA2 for OC were in agreement with the DW values, showing percentage discrepancies of less than 25%. Conclusions: The obtained results showed the potential of EBT-3 in CT patient dosimetry since the lower angular dependence, compared to XR-QA2, compensates for low sensitivity in the diagnostic dose range.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dose in multi-slice cardiac CT: Assessment of organ and effective dose values with Monte Carlo methods
    Schmidt, B
    Ulzheimer, S
    Kalender, WA
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 414 - 414
  • [32] A comparison of dose reduction methods on image quality for cone beam CT
    Webb, R.
    Buckley, L. A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (08) : 23 - 23
  • [33] Comparison of Different Methods of Calculating CT Radiation Effective Dose in Children
    Newman, Beverley
    Ganguly, Arundhuti
    Kim, Jee-eun
    Robinson, Terry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (02) : W232 - W239
  • [34] Comparison of computational to human observer detection for evaluation of CT low dose iterative reconstruction
    Eck, Brendan
    Fahmi, Rachid
    Brown, Kevin M.
    Raihani, Nilgoun
    Wilson, David L.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2014, 9037
  • [35] Comparison between two methods for evaluation of the dialysis dose quality
    Inoue, Kelly Cristina
    Kuroda, Cristina Negumi
    Nakayama, Kazumi Gelia
    Dell'Agnolo, Catia Milene
    Matsuda, Laura Mitsue
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2009, 22 : 494 - 496
  • [36] Radiation dose measurements for personnel performing 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan administration: a comparison between two injection methods for dose reduction
    Law, M.
    Liu, R.
    Ng, S.
    Luk, M. Y.
    Leung, T. W.
    Au, G. K. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 82 (978): : 491 - 496
  • [37] Organ Dose Estimation for CT Localizer Images
    Hoye, J.
    Zhang, Y.
    Fu, W.
    Abadi, E.
    Ria, F.
    Kapadia, A.
    Segars, P.
    Samei, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3301 - 3301
  • [38] Comparison between static and dynamic methods for sorption isotherm measurements
    Arlabosse, P
    Rodier, E
    Ferrasse, JH
    Chavez, S
    Lecomte, D
    DRYING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 21 (03) : 479 - 497
  • [39] Comparison of three methods for determining CT dose profile: presenting the tritium method
    Hansson, Jonny
    Eriksson, Simone
    Thilander-Klang, Anne
    Bath, Magnus
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2010, 139 (1-3) : 434 - 438
  • [40] A comparison of skyshine computational methods
    Hertel, NE
    Sweezy, JE
    Shultis, JK
    Warkentin, JK
    Rose, ZJ
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 116 (1-4) : 525 - 533