A comparison of skyshine computational methods

被引:4
|
作者
Hertel, NE [1 ]
Sweezy, JE
Shultis, JK
Warkentin, JK
Rose, ZJ
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Neely Nucl Res Ctr, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, George W Woodruff Sch Med Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Los Alamos Natl Lab, MCNP Dev Grp, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[4] Kansas State Univ, Dept Mech & Nucl Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[5] NAC Int, Norcross, GA 30092 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/nci274
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A variety of methods employing radiation transport and point-kernel codes have been used to model two skyshine problems. The first problem is a 1 MeV point source of photons on the surface of the earth inside a 2 m tall and 1 m radius silo having black walls. The skyshine radiation downfield from the point source was estimated with and without a 30-cm-thick concrete lid on the silo. The second benchmark problem is to estimate the skyshine radiation downfield from 12 cylindrical canisters emplaced in a low-level radioactive waste trench. The canisters are filled with ion-exchange resin with a representative radionuclide loading, largely (60)Co, (134)Cs and (137)Cs. The solution methods include use of the MCNP code to solve the problem by directly employing variance reduction techniques, the single-scatter point kernel code GGG-GP, the QADMOD-GP point kernel code, the COHORT Monte Carlo code, the NAC International version of the SKYSHINE-III code, the KSU hybrid method and the associated KSU skyshine codes.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 533
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF SKYSHINE ANALYSIS METHODS FOR INTENSE NEUTRON SOURCE FACILITY
    MACDONALD, JL
    HENNINGER, RJ
    BATTAT, ME
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1978, 30 (NOV): : 594 - 595
  • [2] Comparison of computational scattering methods
    Wriedt, T
    Comberg, U
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 1998, 60 (03): : 411 - 423
  • [3] Comparison of Computational Methods for Atomic Charges
    Lu Tian
    Chen Fei-Wu
    ACTA PHYSICO-CHIMICA SINICA, 2012, 28 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [4] A comparison of computational aeroacoustic prediction methods
    Lyrintzis, AS
    Koutsavdis, EK
    Strawn, RC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER SOCIETY, 1997, 42 (01) : 54 - 57
  • [5] APPROXIMATE METHODS IN GAMMA-RAY SKYSHINE CALCULATIONS
    FAW, RE
    ROSEBERRY, ML
    SHULTIS, JK
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1985, 50 (NOV): : 450 - 451
  • [6] Nurse Burnout Revisited: A Comparison of Computational Methods
    Dutra, Herica Silva
    Guirardello, Edineis de Brito
    Li, Yin
    Cimiotti, Jeannie P.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2019, 27 (01) : E17 - E33
  • [7] A Comparison of Computational Methods for Identifying Virulence Factors
    Zheng, Lu-Lu
    Li, Yi-Xue
    Ding, Juan
    Guo, Xiao-Kui
    Feng, Kai-Yan
    Wang, Ya-Jun
    Hu, Le-Le
    Cai, Yu-Dong
    Hao, Pei
    Chou, Kuo-Chen
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [8] Comparison of microbiome samples: methods and computational challenges
    Comin, Matteo
    Di Camillo, Barbara
    Pizzi, Cinzia
    Vandin, Fabio
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 22 (01) : 88 - 95
  • [9] A comparison of the computational complexities of the stride reduction methods
    Evans, DJ
    AlWali, AA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 1996, 61 (3-4) : 307 - 320
  • [10] Comparison of Computational Methods of Associated Legendre Functions
    Enomoto, Takeshi
    SOLA, 2015, 11 : 144 - 149