A novel and clinically useful weight-optimized dynamic conformal arc in stereotactic radiation therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: Dosimetric comparison of treatment plans with volumetric-modulated arc therapy

被引:1
|
作者
Saglam, Yucel [1 ,2 ]
Selek, Ugur [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bolukbasi, Yasemin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Koc Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Davutpasa Caddesi 4, TR-34010 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Amer Hosp Istanbul, UT MD Anderson Radiat Oncol Outreach Ctr, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Non-small cell lung cancer; Volumetric arc therapy; Conformal radiotherapy; ABLATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; MOTION; INTERPLAY; MANAGEMENT; SBRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110623
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study constitutes a feasibility assessment of dynamic conformal arc (DCA) therapy as an alternative to volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lung cancer with the free-breathing technique using four-dimensional computed tomography.Methods: A total of 25 patients who received 50 Gy in four fractions treated using VMAT technique having two partial coplanar arcs with 6 MV beams for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were included. Plans were re -planned using a novel and clinically technique of weight optimized based on dynamic conformal Arcs with two coplanar partial dynamic conformal arcs (WO-DCA). For the two partial arcs, MLC aperture around the PTV was automatically generated at different margins for both arcs and maintained dynamically around the target during arc rotation. Weight of the two arcs using optimization method was adjusted between the arcs to maximize tumor coverage and protect organs at risk (OAR). The clinical VMAT and WO-DCA plans were compared via the RTOG-0915 protocol for conformity and dose to the organs at risk (OAR). Additionally, delivery efficiency, quality assurance pass rate, monitor unit and beam treatment time were recorded.Results: The mean value of quality assurance (QA) pass rate 98.16 +/- 1.27 in WO-DCA and 92.87 +/- 1.56 in VMAT. The rate was higher in WO-DCA (p < 0.001 and t = 8.75). The values of beam-on time (BOT) and monitor units (MU) in the VMAT technique were 4.20 (3.45-4.95) and 3155 (2279-4867) and they were 3.10 (2.85-3.35) and 2167 (1702-2948) in WO-DCA. These values were significantly improved with WO-DCA (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001)Conclusions: As there is, no beam modulation through the target, WO-DCA plans could potentially minimize small-field dosimetry error without MLC interplay effects via respiratory motion and provide similar doses to OAR and the tumor while providing faster treatment delivery by significantly reducing MU and BOT in lung cancer for tumors of appropriate localization. Additionally, providing WO-DCA eliminate patient-specific VMAT quality assurance; potentially offering cost-effective, same day SBRT treatments.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and dynamic conformal arc therapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer using stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Rauschenbach, Bradley M.
    Mackowiak, Luke
    Malhotra, Harish K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (05): : 147 - 161
  • [2] Dynamic conformal arcs for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy: A comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy
    Bokrantz, Rasmus
    Wedenberg, Minna
    Sandwall, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (01): : 103 - 109
  • [3] A dosimetric comparison between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and dynamic conformal arc therapy in SBRT
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Narayanasamy, Ganesh
    Licon, Anna Laura
    Myers, Pamela
    Li, Ying
    Crownover, Richard
    Papanikolaou, Niko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (02): : 838 - 843
  • [4] Comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and dynamic conformal arc treatment planning for cranial stereotactic radiosurgery
    Molinier, Jessica
    Kerr, Christine
    Simeon, Sebastien
    Ailleres, Norbert
    Charissoux, Marie
    Azria, David
    Fenoglietto, Pascal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01): : 92 - 101
  • [5] A comparison of robustness of volumetric modulated arc therapy and dynamic conformal arc therapy for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Teague, Kathlina M.
    Miller, Daniel C.
    Nyamwanda, Jacqueline A.
    Prichard, Hugh A.
    Kirk, Michael C.
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2022, 47 (01) : 110 - 110
  • [6] Novel Clinically Weight-Optimized Dynamic Conformal Arcs (WO-DC A) for Liver SBRT: A Comparison with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
    Saglann, Yucel
    Bolukbasi, Yasemin
    Atasoy, Ali Ihsan
    Karakose, Fatih
    Budak, Mustafa
    Alpan, Vildan
    Topkan, Erkan
    Selek, Ugur
    [J]. THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 17 : 1053 - 1064
  • [7] Dosimetric and Clinical Benefits of Conformal Radiotherapy Plus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Jin, X.
    Xie, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3704 - 3705
  • [8] Dosimetric and Clinical Benefits of Conformal Radiotherapy Plus Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Jin, Xiance
    Xie, Congying
    [J]. WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2015, 51 : 392 - 396
  • [9] Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer
    Lin, Jia-Fu
    Yeh, Dah-Cherng
    Yeh, Hui-Ling
    Chang, Chen-Fa
    Lin, Jin-Ching
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (03) : 262 - 267
  • [10] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: assessing the risk of radiation pneumonitis
    Rosas, Sara
    Barbosa, Barbara
    Couto, Jose G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2018, 17 (01) : 6 - 11