Continuous glucose monitoring-based time-in-range using insulin glargine 300 units/ml versus insulin degludec 100 units/ml in type 1 diabetes: The head-to-head randomized controlled InRange trial

被引:20
|
作者
Battelino, Tadej [1 ]
Danne, Thomas [2 ]
Edelman, Steve, V [3 ]
Choudhary, Pratik [4 ]
Renard, Eric [5 ]
Westerbacka, Jukka [6 ]
Mukherjee, Bhaswati [6 ]
Pilorget, Valerie [6 ]
Coudert, Mathieu [6 ]
Bergenstal, Richard M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, UMC Univ Childrens Hosp, Fac Med, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Childrens & Youth Hosp Auf Der Bult, Diabet Ctr Children & Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Nutr, Montpellier, France
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] HealthPartners Inst, Int Diabet Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM | 2023年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
basal insulin; continuous glucose monitoring; glycaemic control; insulin analogues; randomized trial; type; 1; diabetes; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VARIABILITY; PROFILES; PROVIDES; ADULTS; WORLD; U/ML;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based time-in-range (TIR) as a primary efficacy endpoint to compare the second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin degludec 100 U/ml (IDeg-100) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods InRange was a 12-week, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study comparing glucose TIR and variability between Gla-300 and IDeg-100 using blinded 20-day CGM profiles. The inclusion criteria consisted of adults with T1D treated with multiple daily injections, using BI once daily and rapid-acting insulin analogues for at least 1 year, with an HbA1c of 7% or higher and of 10% or less at screening. Results Overall, 343 participants were randomized: 172 received Gla-300 and 171 IDeg-100. Non-inferiority (10% relative margin) of Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 was shown for the primary endpoint (percentage TIR >= 70 to <= 180 mg/dl): least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval) 52.74% (51.06%, 54.42%) for Gla-300 and 55.09% (53.34%, 56.84%) for IDeg-100; LS mean difference (non-inferiority): 3.16% (0.88%, 5.44%) (non-inferiority P = .0067). Non-inferiority was shown on glucose total coefficient of variation (main secondary endpoint): LS mean 39.91% (39.20%, 40.61%) and 41.22% (40.49%, 41.95%), respectively; LS mean difference (non-inferiority) -5.44% (-6.50%, -4.38%) (non-inferiority P < .0001). Superiority of Gla-300 over IDeg-100 was not shown on TIR. Occurrences of self-measured and CGM-derived hypoglycaemia were comparable between treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with known profiles, with no unexpected findings. Conclusions Using clinically relevant CGM metrics, InRange shows that Gla-300 is non-inferior to IDeg-100 in people with T1D, with comparable hypoglycaemia and safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 555
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] More Similarities Than Differences Testing Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Insulin Degludec 100 Units/mL in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes: The Randomized Head-to-Head BRIGHT Trial
    Rosenstock, Julio
    Cheng, Alice
    Ritzel, Robert
    Bosnyak, Zsolt
    Devisme, Christine
    Cali, Anna M. G.
    Sieber, Jochen
    Stella, Peter
    Wang, Xiangling
    Frias, Juan P.
    Roussel, Ronan
    Bolli, Geremia B.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 (10) : 2147 - 2154
  • [2] In Silico Head-to-Head Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL and Insulin Degludec 100 U/mL in Type 1 Diabetes
    Schiavon, Michele
    Visentin, Roberto
    Giegerich, Clemens
    Sieber, Jochen
    Dalla Man, Chiara
    Cobelli, Claudio
    Klabunde, Thomas
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 22 (08) : 553 - 561
  • [3] Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Head-to-Head Comparison of Clinical, Equivalent Doses of Insulin Glargine 300 units . mL-1 and Insulin Degludec 100 units . mL-1 in Type 1 Diabetes
    Lucidi, Paola
    Candeloro, Paola
    Cioli, Patrizia
    Marinelli Andreoli, Anna
    Pascucci, Chiara
    Gambelunghe, Angela
    Bolli, Geremia B.
    Fanelli, Carmine G.
    Porcellati, Francesca
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2021, 44 (01) : 125 - 132
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of a morning injection of insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL in adult patients with type 1 diabetes: A multicentre, randomized controlled trial using continuous glucose monitoring
    Pettus, Jeremy
    Gill, Jasvinder
    Paranjape, Sachin
    Stewart, John
    Malla, Shilpy
    Edelman, Steven
    Bergenstal, Richard M.
    Bode, Bruce
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2019, 21 (08): : 1906 - 1913
  • [5] IN SILICO HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON OF INSULIN GLARGINE 300 U/ML AND INSULIN DEGLUDEC IN TYPE 1 DIABETES
    Visentin, R.
    Schiavon, M.
    Giegerich, C.
    Sieber, J.
    Man, C. Dalla
    Cobelli, C.
    Klabunde, T.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 20 : A18 - A18
  • [6] New Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Glargine 100 Units/mL in People With Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal and Mealtime Insulin: Glucose Control and Hypoglycemia in a 6-Month Randomized Controlled Trial (EDITION 1)
    Riddle, Matthew C.
    Bolli, Geremia B.
    Ziemen, Monika
    Muehlen-Bartmer, Isabel
    Bizet, Florence
    Home, Philip D.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (10) : 2755 - 2762
  • [7] Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL and 100 Units/mL in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles and Variability Using Morning or Evening Injections
    Bergenstal, RichardM.
    Bailey, Timothy S.
    Rodbard, David
    Ziemen, Monika
    Guo, Hailing
    Muehlen-Bartmer, Isabel
    Ahmann, Andrew J.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2017, 40 (04) : 554 - 560
  • [8] New Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Glargine 100 Units/mL in People With Type 2 Diabetes Using Oral Agents and Basal Insulin: Glucose Control and Hypoglycemia in a 6-Month Randomized Controlled Trial (EDITION 2)
    Yki-Jarvinen, Hannele
    Bergenstal, Richard
    Ziemen, Monika
    Wardecki, Marek
    Muehlen-Bartmer, Isabel
    Boelle, Emmanuelle
    Riddle, Matthew C.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (12) : 3235 - 3243
  • [9] InRange: Comparison of the Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues Glargine 300 U/mL and Degludec 100 U/mL in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring—Study Design
    Tadej Battelino
    Zsolt Bosnyak
    Thomas Danne
    Bhaswati Mukherjee
    Steve Edelman
    Valerie Pilorget
    Pratik Choudhary
    Eric Renard
    Richard Bergenstal
    [J]. Diabetes Therapy, 2020, 11 : 1017 - 1027
  • [10] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus 100 Units/mL in Older People With Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the SENIOR Study
    Ritzel, Robert
    Harris, Stewart B.
    Baron, Helen
    Florez, Hermes
    Roussel, Ronan
    Espinasse, Melanie
    Muehlen-Bartmer, Isabel
    Zhang, Nianxian
    Bertolini, Monica
    Brulle-Wohlhueter, Claire
    Munshi, Medha
    Bolli, Geremia B.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 (08) : 1672 - 1680