Biomechanical Evaluation of TensionLoc Versus the Double Spike Plate for ACL Graft Tibial Fixation

被引:1
|
作者
Jernick, Michael [1 ]
Borden, Peter S. [1 ,2 ]
Seager, Andorra [1 ,2 ]
McGarry, Michelle H. [1 ]
Adamson, Gregory J. [1 ]
Lee, Thay Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Congress Med Fdn, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[2] Sports & Spine Orthopaed, Torrance, CA USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; biomechanical properties; bone-patellar tendon-bone graft; quadriceps graft; TensionLoc; tibial fixation; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; QUADRICEPS TENDON AUTOGRAFT; SUSPENSORY FIXATION; PATELLAR TENDON; RECONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL; DEVICE; BUTTON;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231169198
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:The optimal tibial fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts remains controversial. Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the TensionLoc (TL) cortical fixation device with the Double Spike Plate (DSP) fixation device for ACL tibial fixation using both bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and quadriceps grafts. It was hypothesized that there would be no differences in biomechanical characteristics between the fixation devices regardless of graft type. Study Design:Controlled laboratory study. Methods:ACLR was performed on 14 matched-pair cadaveric knee specimens-7 pairs using quadriceps grafts (n = 3 male cadaveric knee specimens; n = 4 female cadaveric knee specimens; age, 51 +/- 8 years) and 7 pairs using BTB grafts (n = 3 male cadaveric knee specimens; n = 4 female cadaveric knee specimens; age, 50 +/- 7 years). One side of each pair was randomized to receive DSP fixation, and the contralateral side received TL fixation. Specimens underwent cyclic ramp loading (10 cycles each at 50-100 N, 50-250 N, and 50-400 N), followed by load-to-failure testing, with the tensile force in line with the tibial tunnel. Results between the 2 fixation types were compared with a paired t test. Results:For the quadriceps graft, there were no significant differences in cyclic loading or load-to-failure characteristics between fixation types (P >= .092 for all parameters). For the BTB graft, TL fixation resulted in higher stiffness than DSP at all cyclic testing cycles except for cycle 1 during 100-N loading and had lower displacement at 250-N loading (3.4 +/- 0.1 vs 5.4 +/- 0.3 mm; P = .045). For load to failure, TL fixation resulted in higher stiffness than DSP fixation (232 +/- 3.1 vs 188.4 +/- 6.4 N/mm; P = .046); however, all other load-to-failure parameters were not statistically different (P >= .135 for all parameters). Conclusion:With the quadriceps tendon graft, there were no significant differences in biomechanical characteristics between TL and DSP ACL tibial fixations; however, with BTB grafts, the TL tibial fixation demonstrated greater biomechanical integrity than the DSP tibial fixation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tibial graft fixation methods and bone tunnel enlargement: A comparison between the TensionLoc implant system and the double-spike plate
    Kimura, Mitsuhiro
    Nakase, Junsuke
    Asai, Kazuki
    Yoshimizu, Rikuto
    Kanayama, Tomoyuki
    Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE ARTHROSCOPY REHABILITATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 28 : 31 - 37
  • [2] The Bone Bridge for Tibial ACL Graft Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis of Different Tibial Fixation Methods for ACL Reconstruction
    Peez, Christian
    Gressmann, Marvin
    Raschke, Michael J.
    Glasbrenner, Johannes
    Briese, Thorben
    Frank, Andre
    Herbst, Elmar
    Kittl, Christoph
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [3] BIOMECHANICAL PERFORMANCE OF METALLIC AND BIOABSORBABLE INTERFERENCE SCREW FOR TIBIAL GRAFT FIXATION IN ACL RECONSTRUCTION
    Ocampo More, Ari Digiacomo
    Almeida Pizzolatti, Andre Luiz
    Fancello, Eduardo
    de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2013, PT B, 2014,
  • [4] Biomechanical Considerations for Graft Fixation in ACL Reconstruction
    Ettinger, Max
    Petri, Max
    Kwisda, Sebastian
    Krettek, Christian
    Jagodzinski, Michael
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 28 (02) : 126 - 132
  • [5] Biomechanical evaluation of a bioabsorbable expansion bolt for hamstring graft fixation in ACL reconstruction: an experimental study in calf tibial bone
    Piltz, S
    Dieckmann, R
    Meyer, L
    Strunk, P
    Plitz, W
    Lob, G
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2005, 125 (09) : 577 - 584
  • [6] Biomechanical evaluation of a bioabsorbable expansion bolt for hamstring graft fixation in ACL reconstruction: an experimental study in calf tibial bone
    S. Piltz
    R. Dieckmann
    L. Meyer
    P. Strunk
    W. Plitz
    G. Lob
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2005, 125 : 577 - 584
  • [7] Graft fixation with predetermined tension using a new device, the Double Spike Plate
    Shino, K
    Mae, T
    Maeda, A
    Miyama, T
    Shinjo, H
    Kawakami, H
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (08): : 908 - 911
  • [8] A comparative biomechanical evaluation of a noncontacting plate and currently used devices for tibial fixation
    Kowalski, MJ
    Schemitsch, EH
    Harrington, RM
    Chapman, JR
    Swiontkowski, MF
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 40 (01): : 5 - 9
  • [9] Influence of tibial hybrid fixation on graft tension and stability in ACL double-bundle reconstruction
    B. H. Drews
    A. Seitz
    J. Huth
    G. Bauer
    A. Ignatius
    L. Dürselen
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2017, 137 : 981 - 988
  • [10] Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Loop Retention Mechanism for Cortical Graft Fixation in ACL Reconstruction
    Gotschi, Tobias
    Rosenberg, George
    Li, Xiang
    Zhang, Chen
    Bachmann, Elias
    Snedeker, Jess G.
    Fucentese, Sandro F.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (02)