Biomechanical Evaluation of TensionLoc Versus the Double Spike Plate for ACL Graft Tibial Fixation

被引:1
|
作者
Jernick, Michael [1 ]
Borden, Peter S. [1 ,2 ]
Seager, Andorra [1 ,2 ]
McGarry, Michelle H. [1 ]
Adamson, Gregory J. [1 ]
Lee, Thay Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Congress Med Fdn, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[2] Sports & Spine Orthopaed, Torrance, CA USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; biomechanical properties; bone-patellar tendon-bone graft; quadriceps graft; TensionLoc; tibial fixation; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; QUADRICEPS TENDON AUTOGRAFT; SUSPENSORY FIXATION; PATELLAR TENDON; RECONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL; DEVICE; BUTTON;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231169198
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:The optimal tibial fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts remains controversial. Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the TensionLoc (TL) cortical fixation device with the Double Spike Plate (DSP) fixation device for ACL tibial fixation using both bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and quadriceps grafts. It was hypothesized that there would be no differences in biomechanical characteristics between the fixation devices regardless of graft type. Study Design:Controlled laboratory study. Methods:ACLR was performed on 14 matched-pair cadaveric knee specimens-7 pairs using quadriceps grafts (n = 3 male cadaveric knee specimens; n = 4 female cadaveric knee specimens; age, 51 +/- 8 years) and 7 pairs using BTB grafts (n = 3 male cadaveric knee specimens; n = 4 female cadaveric knee specimens; age, 50 +/- 7 years). One side of each pair was randomized to receive DSP fixation, and the contralateral side received TL fixation. Specimens underwent cyclic ramp loading (10 cycles each at 50-100 N, 50-250 N, and 50-400 N), followed by load-to-failure testing, with the tensile force in line with the tibial tunnel. Results between the 2 fixation types were compared with a paired t test. Results:For the quadriceps graft, there were no significant differences in cyclic loading or load-to-failure characteristics between fixation types (P >= .092 for all parameters). For the BTB graft, TL fixation resulted in higher stiffness than DSP at all cyclic testing cycles except for cycle 1 during 100-N loading and had lower displacement at 250-N loading (3.4 +/- 0.1 vs 5.4 +/- 0.3 mm; P = .045). For load to failure, TL fixation resulted in higher stiffness than DSP fixation (232 +/- 3.1 vs 188.4 +/- 6.4 N/mm; P = .046); however, all other load-to-failure parameters were not statistically different (P >= .135 for all parameters). Conclusion:With the quadriceps tendon graft, there were no significant differences in biomechanical characteristics between TL and DSP ACL tibial fixations; however, with BTB grafts, the TL tibial fixation demonstrated greater biomechanical integrity than the DSP tibial fixation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hamstring graft tibial fixation: biomechanical properties of different linkage systems
    Gobbi, A
    Mahajan, S
    Tuy, B
    Panuncialman, I
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2002, 10 (06) : 330 - 334
  • [22] Hamstring graft tibial fixation: biomechanical properties of different linkage systems
    Alberto Gobbi
    Sanjeev Mahajan
    Benjamin Tuy
    Ian Panuncialman
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2002, 10 : 330 - 334
  • [23] Comparative biomechanical study of the Ligament Plate® and other fixation devices in ACL reconstruction
    Jae Ang Sim
    Ji Hoon Kwak
    Sang Hoon Yang
    Beom Koo Lee
    International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33 : 1269 - 1274
  • [24] Biomechanical Comparison of Odontoid Plate Fixation Versus Odontoid Screw Fixation
    Platzer, Patrick
    Eipeldauer, Stefan
    Leitgeb, Johannes
    Aldrian, Silke
    Vecsei, Vilmos
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (03): : 164 - 169
  • [25] Comparative biomechanical study of the Ligament Plate® and other fixation devices in ACL reconstruction
    Sim, Jae Ang
    Kwak, Ji Hoon
    Yang, Sang Hoon
    Lee, Beom Koo
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (05) : 1269 - 1274
  • [26] Biomechanical analysis of bicondylar tibial plateau fixation: How does lateral locking plate fixation compare to dual plate fixation?
    Higgins, Thomas F.
    Klatt, Joshua
    Bachus, Kent N.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2007, 21 (05) : 301 - 306
  • [27] Adjustable- Versus Fixed-Loop Devices for Femoral Fixation in ACL Reconstruction: An In Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Study of Surgical Technique-Based Tibial Fixation and Graft Preparation
    Smith, Patrick A.
    Piepenbrink, Marina
    Smith, Shelby K.
    Bachmaier, Samuel
    Bedi, Asheesh
    Wijdicks, Coen A.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (04):
  • [28] Pullout strength of tibial graft fixation in ACL-replacement with a patellar tendon graft: Interference screw versus staple fixation in human kneesInterferenzschrauben vs. Staples
    T. G. Gerich
    A. Cassim
    C. Lattermann
    H. P. Lobenhoffer
    H. Tscherne
    Der Unfallchirurg, 1998, 101 : 204 - 208
  • [29] Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Motion and ACL Graft Forces After ACLR With and Without LET at Varying Tibial Slopes
    Pearce, Stephanie L.
    Bryniarski, Anna R.
    Brown, Justin R.
    Brady, Alex W.
    Gruskay, Jordan A.
    Dornan, Grant J.
    Vidal, Armando F.
    Godin, Jonathan A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (10): : 2583 - 2588
  • [30] Biomechanical Evaluation of Plate Versus Lag Screw Only Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures
    Misaghi, Amirhossein
    Doan, Josh
    Bastrom, Tracey
    Pennock, Andrew T.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2015, 54 (05): : 896 - 899