Biomechanical Evaluation of TensionLoc Versus the Double Spike Plate for ACL Graft Tibial Fixation

被引:1
|
作者
Jernick, Michael [1 ]
Borden, Peter S. [1 ,2 ]
Seager, Andorra [1 ,2 ]
McGarry, Michelle H. [1 ]
Adamson, Gregory J. [1 ]
Lee, Thay Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Congress Med Fdn, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Pasadena, CA USA
[2] Sports & Spine Orthopaed, Torrance, CA USA
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; biomechanical properties; bone-patellar tendon-bone graft; quadriceps graft; TensionLoc; tibial fixation; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; QUADRICEPS TENDON AUTOGRAFT; SUSPENSORY FIXATION; PATELLAR TENDON; RECONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL; DEVICE; BUTTON;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231169198
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:The optimal tibial fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts remains controversial. Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the TensionLoc (TL) cortical fixation device with the Double Spike Plate (DSP) fixation device for ACL tibial fixation using both bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and quadriceps grafts. It was hypothesized that there would be no differences in biomechanical characteristics between the fixation devices regardless of graft type. Study Design:Controlled laboratory study. Methods:ACLR was performed on 14 matched-pair cadaveric knee specimens-7 pairs using quadriceps grafts (n = 3 male cadaveric knee specimens; n = 4 female cadaveric knee specimens; age, 51 +/- 8 years) and 7 pairs using BTB grafts (n = 3 male cadaveric knee specimens; n = 4 female cadaveric knee specimens; age, 50 +/- 7 years). One side of each pair was randomized to receive DSP fixation, and the contralateral side received TL fixation. Specimens underwent cyclic ramp loading (10 cycles each at 50-100 N, 50-250 N, and 50-400 N), followed by load-to-failure testing, with the tensile force in line with the tibial tunnel. Results between the 2 fixation types were compared with a paired t test. Results:For the quadriceps graft, there were no significant differences in cyclic loading or load-to-failure characteristics between fixation types (P >= .092 for all parameters). For the BTB graft, TL fixation resulted in higher stiffness than DSP at all cyclic testing cycles except for cycle 1 during 100-N loading and had lower displacement at 250-N loading (3.4 +/- 0.1 vs 5.4 +/- 0.3 mm; P = .045). For load to failure, TL fixation resulted in higher stiffness than DSP fixation (232 +/- 3.1 vs 188.4 +/- 6.4 N/mm; P = .046); however, all other load-to-failure parameters were not statistically different (P >= .135 for all parameters). Conclusion:With the quadriceps tendon graft, there were no significant differences in biomechanical characteristics between TL and DSP ACL tibial fixations; however, with BTB grafts, the TL tibial fixation demonstrated greater biomechanical integrity than the DSP tibial fixation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Motion and ACL Graft Forces After ACLR With and Without LET at Varying Tibial Slopes: Response
    Pearce, Stephanie S.
    Brady, Alex W.
    Vidal, Armando F.
    Godin, Jonathan A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (09): : NP22 - NP23
  • [42] Tibial Fixation Properties of a Continuous-Loop ACL Hamstring Graft Construct with Suspensory Fixation in Porcine Bone
    Smith, Patrick A.
    DeBerardino, Thomas M.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2015, 28 (06) : 506 - 512
  • [43] Biomechanical comparison of screw versus screw-plate fixation of type 2 Schatzker fractures of the lateral tibial plateau
    Boisrenoult, P
    Bricteux, S
    Beaufils, P
    Hardy, P
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2000, 86 (07): : 707 - 711
  • [44] ACL Reconstruction with Single Tibial Tunnel: Single Versus Double Bundle
    Maestro, Antonio
    Sicilia, Alberto
    Rodriguez, Luis
    Garcia, Pedro
    Fdez-Lombardia, Jesus
    Guerado, Enrique
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2012, 25 (03) : 237 - 243
  • [45] Biomechanical stability of high tibial opening wedge osteotomy: Internal fixation versus external fixation
    Zhim, F
    Laflamme, GY
    Viens, H
    Saidane, K
    Yahia, L
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 20 (08) : 871 - 876
  • [46] Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: Unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model
    Roberts, Jason W.
    Grindel, Steven I.
    Rebholz, Brandon
    Wang, Mei
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 32A (07): : 971 - 975
  • [47] High-energy tibial plateau fractures: external fixation versus plate fixation
    Yu L.
    Fenglin Z.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015, 25 (3) : 411 - 423
  • [48] ACL double bundle linked cortical-aperture tibial fixation: a technical note
    Nyland, John
    Lee, Yee Han Dave
    McGinnis, Mark
    Kibbe, Shane
    Kocabey, Yavuz
    Caborn, David N. M.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2014, 134 (06) : 835 - 842
  • [49] ACL double bundle linked cortical-aperture tibial fixation: a technical note
    John Nyland
    Yee Han Dave Lee
    Mark McGinnis
    Shane Kibbe
    Yavuz Kocabey
    David N. M. Caborn
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2014, 134 : 835 - 842
  • [50] Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Motion and ACL Graft Forces After ACLR With and Without LET at Varying Tibial Slopes: Letter to the Editor
    Winkler, Philipp W.
    Kayaalp, M. Enes
    Runer, Armin
    Zsidai, Balint
    Lucidi, Gian Andrea
    Debski, Richard E.
    Samuelsson, Kristian
    Musahl, Volker
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (09): : NP20 - NP21