Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

被引:6
|
作者
Erkin, Yueksel [1 ]
Hanci, Volkan [2 ]
Ozduran, Erkan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Phys Med & Rehabil, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[4] 9 Eylul Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil Pain Med, Sch Med, Inciralti Mahallesi Mithatpasa Caddesi 1606 Balco, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
health information; internet; pain; readability; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; HEALTH INFORMATION; PAIN; INTERNET; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033529
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Increasing digitization also raises concerns regarding the reliability and comprehensibility of online health information. In this study, we aimed to examine the readability, reliability, and quality of internet-based patient education materials on "transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation." On September 15, 2022, we used Google search engine to search the keyword "Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation" and obtained information from 200 websites. The readability of the websites was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Gunning Fog. The Journal of American Medical Association score and Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct were used to determine the reliability of the websites, whereas the DISCERN score and Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality of the websites. In the readability analysis of 102 websites that met the inclusion criteria of this study, we found that the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 47.91 +/- 13.79 (difficult), average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were 11.20 +/- 2.85 and 10.53 +/- 2.11 years, respectively, and average Gunning Fog score was 14.04 +/- 2.74 (very difficult). Commercial websites constituted the highest proportion of websites (n = 36, 35.5%). Overall, 16.7% of the websites were found to be of high quality according to the Global Quality Score, 16 (15.7%) websites had Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification, and 8.8% of the websites were found to be highly reliable according to the Journal of American Medical Association scores. There was a statistically significant difference between website typologies and quality and reliability scores (P < .001). Compared with the sixth-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institute of Health, the readability of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-related internet-based patient education materials was considerably high, but they showed low reliability and moderate-to-poor quality. Thus, the quality, reliability, and readability of websites developed by health professionals play a major role in conveying accurate and easily understandable information.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Gunduz, Muhammet Enes
    Matis, Georgios K.
    Ozduran, Erkan
    Hanci, Volkan
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 34 (04) : 588 - 599
  • [2] Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain
    Ozduran, Erkan
    Buyukcoban, Sibel
    PEERJ, 2022, 10
  • [3] Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on chronic low back pain
    Ozduran, Erkan
    Hanci, Volkan
    Erkin, Yuksel
    NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 2024, 37 (03): : 124 - 130
  • [4] Evaluating the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials for Pediatric ACL Tears
    Thomas, Nicholas D.
    Mahler, Raegan
    Rohde, Matthew
    Segovia, Nicole
    Shea, Kevin G.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 43 (09) : 549 - 554
  • [5] Readability and reliability of online patient education materials about statins
    Ngo, Summer
    Asirvatham, Roshini
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Maron, David J.
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 16
  • [6] ASSESSMENT OF THE READABILITY, RELIABILITY AND QUALITY OF ONLINE JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS
    Spiking, J.
    Ignotus, V.
    Moran, S. P.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 56 : 8 - 9
  • [7] Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia
    Joseph, Pradeep
    Silva, Nicole A.
    Nanda, Anil
    Gupta, Gaurav
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : E934 - E938
  • [8] Readability, content, and quality of online patient education materials on preeclampsia
    Lange, Elizabeth M. S.
    Shah, Anuj M.
    Braithwaite, Brian A.
    You, Whitney B.
    Wong, Cynthia A.
    Grobman, William A.
    Toledo, Paloma
    HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2015, 34 (03) : 383 - 390
  • [9] Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Orthopedic Oncology
    Para, Ashok
    Thelmo, Franklin
    Rynecki, Nicole D.
    Zelman, Brandon
    Gupta, Raghav
    Coban, Daniel
    Ayyaswami, Varun
    Prabhu, Arpan, V
    Ippolito, Joseph A.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Moore, Justin M.
    Beebe, Kathleen S.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 44 (01) : 38 - +
  • [10] Evaluating the readability of online patient education materials on skin care in Mpox
    Nusynowitz, Jake
    Gessner, Nicholas
    Leslie, Kieron S.
    Trinidad, John C.
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 317 (01)