Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Orthopedic Oncology

被引:5
|
作者
Para, Ashok [1 ]
Thelmo, Franklin [3 ]
Rynecki, Nicole D. [1 ]
Zelman, Brandon [3 ]
Gupta, Raghav [2 ]
Coban, Daniel [1 ]
Ayyaswami, Varun [6 ]
Prabhu, Arpan, V [4 ]
Ippolito, Joseph A. [1 ]
Agarwal, Nitin [5 ]
Moore, Justin M. [7 ]
Beebe, Kathleen S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 140 Bergen St,ACC D1610, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Philadelphia Coll Osteopath Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Neurosurg Serv, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
AMERICAN ACADEMY; QUALITY; RECONSTRUCTION; RESOURCES; SURGEONS;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20201012-04
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The internet is increasingly used to access patient education materials. The average American reading level has been found to be that of a 7th- to 8th-grade student, prompting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American Medical Association (AMA) to advise that patient education materials be written between the 4th- to 6th-grade reading level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reading level of current patient education materials for the most common musculoskeletal oncological tumors. A Google search was performed with all location filters off to account for geographic variability for patient education materials related to 28 orthopedic primary or secondary tumors. All patient education articles from the first 10 website hits for each tumor type were analyzed. Patient education materials from these websites were evaluated using 8 validated readability scales. Patient resources were found to be written at an average grade level nearly double the NIH and AMA recommendation. Patient education materials for soft tissue chondromas were written at the highest level (14.8 +/- 1.9), whereas education materials for chordomas (10.1 +/- 1.0) most closely approached national recommendations, despite still being written at a readability level nearly 4 grade levels higher than has been recommended. The Flesch Reading Ease assessment provided a mean score of 46.5 +/- 7.7, corresponding with a "difficult to read" result. Current patient education materials regarding oncological musculoskeletal-related patient education materials are written significantly above the recommended reading level. Further modification of these resources is warranted to ensure adequate comprehension and informed decision making in the clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to IR
    McEnteggart, Gregory E.
    Naeem, Muhammad
    Skierkowski, Dorothy
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ahn, Sun H.
    Soares, Gregory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (08) : 1164 - 1168
  • [2] Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia
    Joseph, Pradeep
    Silva, Nicole A.
    Nanda, Anil
    Gupta, Gaurav
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : E934 - E938
  • [3] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials in Radiation Oncology - Are We Improving?
    Rooney, M. K.
    Sachdev, S.
    Byun, J.
    Jagsi, R.
    Golden, D. W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : S219 - S219
  • [4] Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment
    Pearson, Keon
    Ngo, Summer
    Ekpo, Eson
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Baird, Grayson
    Knowles, Joshua
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [5] Evaluating the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials for Pediatric ACL Tears
    Thomas, Nicholas D.
    Mahler, Raegan
    Rohde, Matthew
    Segovia, Nicole
    Shea, Kevin G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 43 (09) : 549 - 554
  • [6] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Cheng, Brian T.
    Kim, Anne B.
    Tanna, Angelo P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (06) : 438 - 442
  • [7] Readability of Orthopaedic Oncology-related Patient Education Materials Available on the Internet
    Shah, Akash K.
    Yi, Paul H.
    Stein, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2015, 23 (12) : 783 - 788
  • [8] Readability of American Online Patient Education Materials in Urologic Oncology: A Need for Simple Communication
    Pruthi, Amanda
    Nielsen, Matthew E.
    Raynor, Mathew C.
    Woods, Michael E.
    Wallen, Eric M.
    Smith, Angela B.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (02) : 351 - 356
  • [9] Quality and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Branchial Cleft Cysts
    Daines, Benjamin S.
    Idicula, Winslo
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [10] Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Gunduz, Muhammet Enes
    Matis, Georgios K.
    Ozduran, Erkan
    Hanci, Volkan
    [J]. TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 34 (04) : 588 - 599