Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Orthopedic Oncology

被引:5
|
作者
Para, Ashok [1 ]
Thelmo, Franklin [3 ]
Rynecki, Nicole D. [1 ]
Zelman, Brandon [3 ]
Gupta, Raghav [2 ]
Coban, Daniel [1 ]
Ayyaswami, Varun [6 ]
Prabhu, Arpan, V [4 ]
Ippolito, Joseph A. [1 ]
Agarwal, Nitin [5 ]
Moore, Justin M. [7 ]
Beebe, Kathleen S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 140 Bergen St,ACC D1610, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Dept Neurol Surg, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Philadelphia Coll Osteopath Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Neurosurg Serv, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
AMERICAN ACADEMY; QUALITY; RECONSTRUCTION; RESOURCES; SURGEONS;
D O I
10.3928/01477447-20201012-04
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The internet is increasingly used to access patient education materials. The average American reading level has been found to be that of a 7th- to 8th-grade student, prompting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American Medical Association (AMA) to advise that patient education materials be written between the 4th- to 6th-grade reading level. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reading level of current patient education materials for the most common musculoskeletal oncological tumors. A Google search was performed with all location filters off to account for geographic variability for patient education materials related to 28 orthopedic primary or secondary tumors. All patient education articles from the first 10 website hits for each tumor type were analyzed. Patient education materials from these websites were evaluated using 8 validated readability scales. Patient resources were found to be written at an average grade level nearly double the NIH and AMA recommendation. Patient education materials for soft tissue chondromas were written at the highest level (14.8 +/- 1.9), whereas education materials for chordomas (10.1 +/- 1.0) most closely approached national recommendations, despite still being written at a readability level nearly 4 grade levels higher than has been recommended. The Flesch Reading Ease assessment provided a mean score of 46.5 +/- 7.7, corresponding with a "difficult to read" result. Current patient education materials regarding oncological musculoskeletal-related patient education materials are written significantly above the recommended reading level. Further modification of these resources is warranted to ensure adequate comprehension and informed decision making in the clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Martin, Cole A.
    Khan, Saima
    Lee, Rachel
    Do, Anna T.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Crowell, Eric L.
    Bowden, Eileen C.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (05): : 525 - 530
  • [22] Readability of online patient education materials for juvenile dermatomyositis
    Nickles, Melissa A.
    Ramani, Santhoshini L.
    Tegtmeyer, Kyle
    Zhao, Jeffrey
    Lio, Peter A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 38 (02) : 544 - 546
  • [23] Readability and Suitability of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Khan, Saima
    Moon, Jared
    Martin, Cole A. A.
    Bowden, Eileen
    Chen, Judy
    Tsui, Edmund
    Crowell, Eric
    [J]. OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (07) : 1175 - 1179
  • [24] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Peripheral Neuropathy
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Hansberry, David
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [25] Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials
    Colaco, Marc
    Svider, Peter F.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Jackson, Imani M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03): : 1048 - 1052
  • [26] Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain
    Ozduran, Erkan
    Buyukcoban, Sibel
    [J]. PEERJ, 2022, 10
  • [27] Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Arthroscopy-Related Online Patient Education Materials
    Akinleye, Sheriff D.
    Krochak, Ryan
    Richardson, Nicholas
    Garofolo, Garret
    Culbertson, Maya Deza
    Erez, Orry
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (04): : 1272 - 1279
  • [28] Evaluating the Readability of Online Blood Cancer Education Materials Across Different Readability Measures
    Shin, Ashley
    Banubakode, Surbhi
    Alam, Sara Taveras
    Gonzalez, Anneliese O.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [29] The Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Common Oculoplastics Diagnoses and Treatments
    Cohen, Samuel A.
    Tijerina, Jonathan D.
    Kossler, Andrea
    [J]. SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 38 (04) : 387 - 393
  • [30] Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment
    Cohen, Samuel A.
    Fisher, Ann Caroline
    Pershing, Suzann
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 : 779 - 788