Analysis of the Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment

被引:6
|
作者
Cohen, Samuel A. [1 ,2 ]
Fisher, Ann Caroline [1 ,2 ]
Pershing, Suzann [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94303 USA
[2] Byers Eye Inst Stanford, Stanford, CA USA
[3] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, 2452 Watson Court, Stanford, CA 94303 USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
readability; accountability; glaucoma; diagnosis; treatment; HEALTH LITERACY; INTERNET; ADHERENCE; INFORMATION; BARRIERS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S401492
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the readability and accountability of online patient education materials related to glaucoma diagnosis and treatment.Methods: We conducted a Google search for 10 search terms related to glaucoma diagnosis and 10 search terms related to glaucoma treatment. For each search term, the first 10 patient education websites populated after Google search were assessed for readability and accountability. Readability was assessed using five validated measures: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and New Dale-Chall (NDC). Accountability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmarks. The source of information for each article analyzed was recorded.Results: Of the 200 total websites analyzed, only 11% were written at or below the recommended 6th grade reading level. The average FRE and grade level for 100 glaucoma diagnosis-related articles were 42.02 +/- 1.08 and 10.53 +/- 1.30, respectively. The average FRE and grade level for 100 glaucoma treatment-related articles were 43.86 +/- 1.01 and 11.29 +/- 1.54, respectively. Crowdsourced articles were written at the highest average grade level (12.32 +/- 0.78), followed by articles written by private practice/independent users (11.22 +/- 1.74), national organizations (10.92 +/- 1.24), and educational institutions (10.33 +/- 1.35). Websites averaged 1.12 +/- 1.15 of 4 JAMA accountability metrics.Conclusion: Despite wide variation in the readability and accountability of online patient education materials related to glaucoma diagnosis and treatment, patient education materials are consistently written at levels above the recommended reading level and often lack accountability. Articles from educational institutions and national organizations were often written at lower reading levels but are less frequently encountered after Google search. There is a need for accurate and understandable online information that glaucoma patients can use to inform decisions about their eye health.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 788
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Cheng, Brian T.
    Kim, Anne B.
    Tanna, Angelo P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (06) : 438 - 442
  • [2] Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Martin, Cole A.
    Khan, Saima
    Lee, Rachel
    Do, Anna T.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Crowell, Eric L.
    Bowden, Eileen C.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (05): : 525 - 530
  • [3] The Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Common Oculoplastics Diagnoses and Treatments
    Cohen, Samuel A.
    Tijerina, Jonathan D.
    Kossler, Andrea
    [J]. SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 38 (04) : 387 - 393
  • [4] Readability and Accountability of Online Patient Education Materials for Common Retinal Diseases
    Cohen, Samuel A.
    Pershing, Suzann
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA, 2022, 6 (07): : 641 - 643
  • [5] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to IR
    McEnteggart, Gregory E.
    Naeem, Muhammad
    Skierkowski, Dorothy
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ahn, Sun H.
    Soares, Gregory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (08) : 1164 - 1168
  • [6] Assessment of the Quality, Accountability, and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Optic Neuritis
    Patel, Prem N.
    Patel, Parth A.
    Ahmed, Harris
    Lai, Kevin E.
    Mackay, Devin D.
    Mollan, Susan P.
    Truong-Le, Melanie
    [J]. NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 48 (04) : 257 - 266
  • [7] Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment
    Pearson, Keon
    Ngo, Summer
    Ekpo, Eson
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Baird, Grayson
    Knowles, Joshua
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [8] Assessment of the readability and quality of online patient education materials for the medical treatment of open-angle glaucoma
    Crabtree, Lois
    Lee, Edward
    [J]. BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 7 (01):
  • [9] Analysis of Online Readability Level of Patient Education Materials for Hemorrhoids
    Gulati, Rishabh
    Nawaz, Mohammad
    Rotundo, Laura
    Ahlawat, Sushil
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S84 - S84
  • [10] Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Orthopedic Oncology
    Para, Ashok
    Thelmo, Franklin
    Rynecki, Nicole D.
    Zelman, Brandon
    Gupta, Raghav
    Coban, Daniel
    Ayyaswami, Varun
    Prabhu, Arpan, V
    Ippolito, Joseph A.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Moore, Justin M.
    Beebe, Kathleen S.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 44 (01) : 38 - +