Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

被引:6
|
作者
Erkin, Yueksel [1 ]
Hanci, Volkan [2 ]
Ozduran, Erkan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Phys Med & Rehabil, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[4] 9 Eylul Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil Pain Med, Sch Med, Inciralti Mahallesi Mithatpasa Caddesi 1606 Balco, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
health information; internet; pain; readability; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; HEALTH INFORMATION; PAIN; INTERNET; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033529
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Increasing digitization also raises concerns regarding the reliability and comprehensibility of online health information. In this study, we aimed to examine the readability, reliability, and quality of internet-based patient education materials on "transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation." On September 15, 2022, we used Google search engine to search the keyword "Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation" and obtained information from 200 websites. The readability of the websites was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Gunning Fog. The Journal of American Medical Association score and Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct were used to determine the reliability of the websites, whereas the DISCERN score and Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality of the websites. In the readability analysis of 102 websites that met the inclusion criteria of this study, we found that the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 47.91 +/- 13.79 (difficult), average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were 11.20 +/- 2.85 and 10.53 +/- 2.11 years, respectively, and average Gunning Fog score was 14.04 +/- 2.74 (very difficult). Commercial websites constituted the highest proportion of websites (n = 36, 35.5%). Overall, 16.7% of the websites were found to be of high quality according to the Global Quality Score, 16 (15.7%) websites had Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification, and 8.8% of the websites were found to be highly reliable according to the Journal of American Medical Association scores. There was a statistically significant difference between website typologies and quality and reliability scores (P < .001). Compared with the sixth-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institute of Health, the readability of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-related internet-based patient education materials was considerably high, but they showed low reliability and moderate-to-poor quality. Thus, the quality, reliability, and readability of websites developed by health professionals play a major role in conveying accurate and easily understandable information.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behcet's disease
    Ozduran, E.
    Hanci, V
    REUMATISMO, 2022, 74 (02) : 49 - 60
  • [42] Breast reconstruction: readability and reliability of patient education materials on the web
    Deol, H. K.
    Soobrah, R.
    Voll, J.
    Smith, S. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 71 - 71
  • [43] Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment
    Pearson, Keon
    Ngo, Summer
    Ekpo, Eson
    Sarraju, Ashish
    Baird, Grayson
    Knowles, Joshua
    Rodriguez, Fatima
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [44] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Interventional Pain Procedures
    Kamath, Dilip
    Mcintyre, Sean
    Peskin, Evan
    Stratman, Scott
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Kamath, Preetha D.
    Gupta, Raghav
    Schwartz, Ruben
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    Urits, Ivan
    Viswanath, Omar
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Horn, Danielle B.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [45] Analysis of Online Readability Level of Patient Education Materials for Hemorrhoids
    Gulati, Rishabh
    Nawaz, Mohammad
    Rotundo, Laura
    Ahlawat, Sushil
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S84 - S84
  • [46] The readability of online patient education materials on maxillomandibular advancement surgery
    Khan, Sofia
    Walters, Rameen K.
    Walker, Angelica M.
    Nguyen, Shaun A.
    Liu, Stanley Y.
    Tremont, Timothy J.
    Abdelwahab, Mohamed A.
    SLEEP AND BREATHING, 2024, 28 (02) : 745 - 751
  • [47] Readability of Online Foot and Ankle Surgery Patient Education Materials
    Hartnett, Davis A.
    Philips, Alexander P.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    Blankenhorn, Brad D.
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2025, 18 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [48] Readability of online patient education materials for Merkel cell carcinoma
    Yue Zhang
    Catherine C. Nguyen
    Karl Y. Bilimoria
    Ryan P. Merkow
    Archives of Dermatological Research, 2023, 315 : 629 - 632
  • [49] Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Materials on Atrial Fibrillation
    Siddiqui, Emaad
    Shah, Aakash
    Waller, Alfonso H.
    Sambol, Justin
    CIRCULATION, 2019, 140
  • [50] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Congenital Hand Differences
    Baldwin, Alexander J.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024, 19 (07): : 1146 - 1153