Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

被引:6
|
作者
Erkin, Yueksel [1 ]
Hanci, Volkan [2 ]
Ozduran, Erkan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Phys Med & Rehabil, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[4] 9 Eylul Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil Pain Med, Sch Med, Inciralti Mahallesi Mithatpasa Caddesi 1606 Balco, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
health information; internet; pain; readability; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; HEALTH INFORMATION; PAIN; INTERNET; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033529
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Increasing digitization also raises concerns regarding the reliability and comprehensibility of online health information. In this study, we aimed to examine the readability, reliability, and quality of internet-based patient education materials on "transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation." On September 15, 2022, we used Google search engine to search the keyword "Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation" and obtained information from 200 websites. The readability of the websites was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Gunning Fog. The Journal of American Medical Association score and Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct were used to determine the reliability of the websites, whereas the DISCERN score and Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality of the websites. In the readability analysis of 102 websites that met the inclusion criteria of this study, we found that the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 47.91 +/- 13.79 (difficult), average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were 11.20 +/- 2.85 and 10.53 +/- 2.11 years, respectively, and average Gunning Fog score was 14.04 +/- 2.74 (very difficult). Commercial websites constituted the highest proportion of websites (n = 36, 35.5%). Overall, 16.7% of the websites were found to be of high quality according to the Global Quality Score, 16 (15.7%) websites had Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification, and 8.8% of the websites were found to be highly reliable according to the Journal of American Medical Association scores. There was a statistically significant difference between website typologies and quality and reliability scores (P < .001). Compared with the sixth-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institute of Health, the readability of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-related internet-based patient education materials was considerably high, but they showed low reliability and moderate-to-poor quality. Thus, the quality, reliability, and readability of websites developed by health professionals play a major role in conveying accurate and easily understandable information.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology
    Rishabh S. Mazmudar
    Anjani Sheth
    Raghav Tripathi
    Jeffrey F. Scott
    Archives of Dermatological Research, 2021, 313 : 201 - 204
  • [22] Readability and Suitability of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Khan, Saima
    Moon, Jared
    Martin, Cole
    Bowden, Eileen
    Chen, Judy Lynn
    Tsui, Edmund
    Crowell, Eric
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [23] Readability Assessment of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Ayoub, Samantha
    Tsui, Edmund
    Mohammed, Taariq
    Tseng, Joseph
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2019, 27 (03) : 399 - 403
  • [24] Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology
    Mazmudar, Rishabh S.
    Sheth, Anjani
    Tripathi, Raghav
    Scott, Jeffrey F.
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 313 (03) : 201 - 204
  • [25] Readability of online patient education materials for juvenile dermatomyositis
    Nickles, Melissa A.
    Ramani, Santhoshini L.
    Tegtmeyer, Kyle
    Zhao, Jeffrey
    Lio, Peter A.
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 38 (02) : 544 - 546
  • [26] Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Martin, Cole A.
    Khan, Saima
    Lee, Rachel
    Do, Anna T.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Crowell, Eric L.
    Bowden, Eileen C.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (05): : 525 - 530
  • [27] Readability and Suitability of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Khan, Saima
    Moon, Jared
    Martin, Cole A. A.
    Bowden, Eileen
    Chen, Judy
    Tsui, Edmund
    Crowell, Eric
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (07) : 1175 - 1179
  • [28] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Peripheral Neuropathy
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Hansberry, David
    NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [29] Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials
    Colaco, Marc
    Svider, Peter F.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Jackson, Imani M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03): : 1048 - 1052
  • [30] Readability, Content, and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials on Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity in the Pediatric Population
    Freed, Karen
    Taylor, Michael G.
    Toledo, Paloma
    Kruse, Jessica H.
    Palanisamy, Arvind
    Lange, Elizabeth M. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e341 - e347