Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

被引:6
|
作者
Erkin, Yueksel [1 ]
Hanci, Volkan [2 ]
Ozduran, Erkan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Phys Med & Rehabil, Algol, Izmir, Turkiye
[4] 9 Eylul Univ, Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil Pain Med, Sch Med, Inciralti Mahallesi Mithatpasa Caddesi 1606 Balco, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
health information; internet; pain; readability; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; HEALTH INFORMATION; PAIN; INTERNET; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033529
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Increasing digitization also raises concerns regarding the reliability and comprehensibility of online health information. In this study, we aimed to examine the readability, reliability, and quality of internet-based patient education materials on "transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation." On September 15, 2022, we used Google search engine to search the keyword "Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation" and obtained information from 200 websites. The readability of the websites was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Gunning Fog. The Journal of American Medical Association score and Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct were used to determine the reliability of the websites, whereas the DISCERN score and Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality of the websites. In the readability analysis of 102 websites that met the inclusion criteria of this study, we found that the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 47.91 +/- 13.79 (difficult), average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were 11.20 +/- 2.85 and 10.53 +/- 2.11 years, respectively, and average Gunning Fog score was 14.04 +/- 2.74 (very difficult). Commercial websites constituted the highest proportion of websites (n = 36, 35.5%). Overall, 16.7% of the websites were found to be of high quality according to the Global Quality Score, 16 (15.7%) websites had Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification, and 8.8% of the websites were found to be highly reliable according to the Journal of American Medical Association scores. There was a statistically significant difference between website typologies and quality and reliability scores (P < .001). Compared with the sixth-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institute of Health, the readability of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-related internet-based patient education materials was considerably high, but they showed low reliability and moderate-to-poor quality. Thus, the quality, reliability, and readability of websites developed by health professionals play a major role in conveying accurate and easily understandable information.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of the Readability, Availability, and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials Regarding Uveitis Medications
    Tran, Joseph
    Tsui, Edmund
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2021, 29 (7-8) : 1507 - 1512
  • [32] 152 Assessment of Quality and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Relating to Dog Bites
    Dadabhoy, M.
    Awal, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (SUPPL 6)
  • [33] The Readability, Actionability, and Quality of Hemorrhoid Online Education Materials: Are We Addressing Patient Concerns?
    Eng, Isabel
    Chen, Formosa C.
    Russell, Marcia M.
    Salinas, Daniela
    Russell, Tara A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S103 - S103
  • [34] Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards
    Lee, Kevin C.
    Berg, Elizabeth T.
    Jazayeri, Hossein E.
    Chuang, Sung-Kiang
    Eisig, Sidney B.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (01) : 180.e1 - 180.e8
  • [35] Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials Concerning Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Venosa, Michele
    Cerciello, Simone
    Zoubi, Mohammad
    Petralia, Giuseppe
    Vespasiani, Andrea
    Angelozzi, Massimo
    Romanini, Emilio
    Logroscino, Giandomenico
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [36] Quality and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer
    Patel, Krishan S.
    Ahlawat, Sushil
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S192 - S193
  • [37] Evaluating the Readability of Online Blood Cancer Education Materials Across Different Readability Measures
    Shin, Ashley
    Banubakode, Surbhi
    Alam, Sara Taveras
    Gonzalez, Anneliese O.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [38] The quality and readability of online molar incisor hypomineralization patient education materials: a systematic analysis
    Meade, M. J.
    Dreyer, C. W.
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2022, 67 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [39] Through the lens of the patient: assessing the readability of online patient education materials
    Kapoor, K.
    George, P.
    Evans, M. C.
    Liu, S. S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1251 - 1252
  • [40] Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Information on Sjogren's Syndrome
    Ozduran, Erkan
    Hanci, Volkan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01) : 16 - 25