Comparing eDQE and eNEQ metrics - is there an alternative approach to assessing image quality in digital mammography?

被引:0
|
作者
Wysocka-Rabin, Anna [1 ]
Dobrzynska, Magdalena [1 ]
Pasicz, Katarzyna [2 ]
Skrzynski, Witold [2 ]
Fabiszewska, Ewa [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Nucl Res NCNR, Particle Accelerat Phys & Technol Div, Otwock, Poland
[2] Mar Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol MSCNRIO, Med Phys Dept, Warsaw, Poland
来源
关键词
image quality; digital mammography; effective detective quantum efficiency; effective noise equivalent quanta; DQE; SYSTEMS; SCATTER; MTF;
D O I
10.2478/pjmpe-2023-0018
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Early detection of breast cancer requires high-quality mammographic images that have been made possible by the introduction of new technologies, such as full-field digital mammography (FFDM). In this new study, we perform extended measurements to calculate effective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE) and introduce effective noise equivalent quanta (eNEQ). Our aim was to show how these two metrics relate to the image quality of two digital mammography systems.Material and methods: Measurements were performed for a Siemens Mammomat Inspiration and a GE Senographe Pristina system. Each was equipped with an automatic exposure control (AEC) for use in a clinical setting. We used a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom at thicknesses of 20, 30, 40 and 70 mm to cover the range of scatter conditions expected in mammography, with and without an anti-scatter grid. The Siemens system had an a-Se detector, and the GE system had an indirect-conversion detector. Measurements of Kerma were performed with Piranha Black 657 meter (RTI Electronics AB). The majority of our calculations were automated, using a modified version of our software.Results: For the two mammographic systems evaluated, we characterized physical quality parameters, such as effective modulation transfer function (eMTF), effective normalized noise power spectrum (eNNPS), eDQE and eNEQ for a wide range of exposures, phantom thicknesses, with and without an anti-scatter grid. Results are presented as a function of spatial frequency. A contrast-detail analysis was performed with a CDMAM 3.4 phantom with dedicated software (CDMAM analysis 1.5.5, NCCPM) and a set of different PMMA phantoms.Conclusions: We successfully demonstrated that the eNEQ metric can be used as a new option to evaluate image quality for images taken with and without a grid and with phantoms of different thicknesses for the Siemens and GE systems. These results were consistent with the results obtained from CDMAM.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 177
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE) and effective noise equivalent quanta (eNEQ) for system optimization purposes in digital mammography
    Salvagnini, Elena
    Bosmans, Hilde
    Struelens, Lara
    Marshall, Nicholas W.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 8313
  • [2] On image quality metrics and the usefulness of grids in digital mammography
    Chen, Han E. K.
    Danielsson, Mats
    Xu, Cheng
    Cederstrom, Bjorn
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2015, 2 (01)
  • [3] Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: An overview
    Bosmans, H
    Carton, AK
    Rogge, F
    Zanca, F
    Jacobs, J
    Van Ongeval, C
    Nijs, K
    Van Steen, A
    Marchal, G
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 117 (1-3) : 120 - 130
  • [4] A statistical alternative to current measures of image quality in digital mammography
    Caldwell, D.
    Baldelli, P.
    Phelan, N.
    Kenny, P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (03):
  • [5] How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?'
    Huda, W
    Sajewicz, AM
    Ogden, KM
    Scalzetti, EM
    Dance, DR
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (07) : 764 - 772
  • [6] Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing
    Baydush, AH
    Floyd, CE
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (07) : 1503 - 1508
  • [7] A TEST OBJECT FOR ASSESSING IMAGE QUALITY IN MAMMOGRAPHY
    WHITE, DR
    TUCKER, AK
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1980, 53 (628): : 331 - 335
  • [8] Digital mammography quality assurance: Comparing the manufacturers recommendations
    Berns, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2511 - 2511
  • [9] Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography
    Fausto, Agnes M. F.
    Lopes, M. C.
    de Sousa, M. C.
    Furquim, Tania A. C.
    Mol, Anderson W.
    Velasco, Fermin G.
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2017, 30 (02) : 185 - 196
  • [10] Optimization of Image Quality and Dose in Digital Mammography
    Agnes M. F. Fausto
    M. C. Lopes
    M. C. de Sousa
    Tânia A. C. Furquim
    Anderson W. Mol
    Fermin G. Velasco
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2017, 30 : 185 - 196