Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Barufaldi, Laura A. [1 ,5 ]
de Albuquerque, Rita de C. R. [1 ]
do Nascimento, Aline [1 ]
Martins, Luis Felipe L. [2 ]
Zimmermann, Ivan R. [3 ]
de Souza, Mirian C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Surveillance & Situat Anal, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Brasilia, Brazil
[4] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Populat Res, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[5] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, 125 Marques Pombal St, BR-20230240 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
antibodies; colorectal neoplasms; cost-effectiveness evaluation; health evaluation; monoclonal; neoplasm metastasis; 2ND-LINE TREATMENT; CETUXIMAB; BEVACIZUMAB; PANITUMUMAB; FOLFIRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2023.04.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab and panitumumab) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) monoclonal antibodies associated with conventional chemotherapy (CT) (fluorouracil and leucovorin with irinotecan) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: A partitioned survival analysis model was adopted to simulate direct health costs and benefits comparing thera-peutic options in a 10 years' time horizon. Model data were extracted from the literature and costs were obtained from Brazilian official government databases. The analysis considered the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System; costs were measured in local currency (BRL) and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and benefits. Alternative willingness-to-pay scenarios, varying from 3 to 5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold established in Brazil, were estimated. The results were presented incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.Results: The most cost-effective choice would be the association of CT with panitumumab, with an ICER of $58 330.15/QALY compared with isolated CT. The second-best option was CT with bevacizumab and panitumumab, with an ICER of $71195.40/ QALY compared with panitumumab alone. Although having higher costs, the second-best option was the most effective. Both strategies were cost-effective in part of the Monte Carlo iterations, considering the 33 threshold. Conclusions: The therapeutic option CT + panitumumab + bevacizumab represents the most significant effectiveness gain in our study. It is the second-lowest cost-effectiveness, and this option includes monoclonal antibodies association for patients with and without KRAS mutation.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness analysis of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Villa, D.
    Hedden, L.
    Peacock, S.
    Kennecke, H. F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies in the First-line Treatment of RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Morimoto, Takashi
    Fujito, Kaori
    Yamasaki, Bumpei
    Goto, Rei
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 45 (01) : 41 - 54
  • [3] Atezolizumab with chemotherapy in first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Zhang, Peng-Fei
    Wen, Feng
    Wu, Qiu-Ji
    Li, Qiu
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (14) : 1021 - 1030
  • [4] Monoclonal Antibodies for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Liao, Pei-Fei
    Wu, Ta-Wei
    Peng, Tzu-Rong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 31 (03) : e286 - e297
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of maintenance therapy after first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Giuliani, Jacopo
    Mantoan, Beatrice
    Bonetti, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (01) : 194 - 198
  • [6] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CETUXIMAB AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES
    Ortendahl, J. D.
    Bentley, T. G.
    Anene, A. M.
    Purdum, A. G.
    Bolinder, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A86 - A86
  • [7] The cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in England and Wales
    Tappenden, P.
    Jones, R.
    Paisley, S.
    Carroll, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (17) : 2487 - 2494
  • [8] Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States
    Shankaran, Veena
    Ortendahl, Jesse D.
    Purdum, Anna G.
    Bolinder, Bjorn
    Anene, Ayanna M.
    Sun, Gordon H.
    Bentley, Tanya G. K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (01): : 65 - 72
  • [9] Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Saudi Arabia
    Elsamany, Shereef
    Elsisi, Gihan Hamdy
    Hassanin, Fayza Ahmed Mohamed
    Saleh, Khaldoon
    Tashkandi, Emad
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 28 : 67 - 75
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Attard, C. L.
    Brown, S.
    Alloul, K.
    Moore, M. J.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (01) : E41 - E51