Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Barufaldi, Laura A. [1 ,5 ]
de Albuquerque, Rita de C. R. [1 ]
do Nascimento, Aline [1 ]
Martins, Luis Felipe L. [2 ]
Zimmermann, Ivan R. [3 ]
de Souza, Mirian C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Surveillance & Situat Anal, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Brasilia, Brazil
[4] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Populat Res, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[5] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, 125 Marques Pombal St, BR-20230240 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
antibodies; colorectal neoplasms; cost-effectiveness evaluation; health evaluation; monoclonal; neoplasm metastasis; 2ND-LINE TREATMENT; CETUXIMAB; BEVACIZUMAB; PANITUMUMAB; FOLFIRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2023.04.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab and panitumumab) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) monoclonal antibodies associated with conventional chemotherapy (CT) (fluorouracil and leucovorin with irinotecan) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: A partitioned survival analysis model was adopted to simulate direct health costs and benefits comparing thera-peutic options in a 10 years' time horizon. Model data were extracted from the literature and costs were obtained from Brazilian official government databases. The analysis considered the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System; costs were measured in local currency (BRL) and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and benefits. Alternative willingness-to-pay scenarios, varying from 3 to 5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold established in Brazil, were estimated. The results were presented incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.Results: The most cost-effective choice would be the association of CT with panitumumab, with an ICER of $58 330.15/QALY compared with isolated CT. The second-best option was CT with bevacizumab and panitumumab, with an ICER of $71195.40/ QALY compared with panitumumab alone. Although having higher costs, the second-best option was the most effective. Both strategies were cost-effective in part of the Monte Carlo iterations, considering the 33 threshold. Conclusions: The therapeutic option CT + panitumumab + bevacizumab represents the most significant effectiveness gain in our study. It is the second-lowest cost-effectiveness, and this option includes monoclonal antibodies association for patients with and without KRAS mutation.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
    Shuxia Qin
    Lidan Yi
    Sini Li
    Chongqing Tan
    Xiaohui Zeng
    Liting Wang
    Ye Peng
    Xiaomin Wan
    Advances in Therapy, 2021, 38 : 3399 - 3408
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.
    Attard, Cheryl L.
    Brown, Stephen
    Alloul, Karine
    Moore, Malcolm J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (04)
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic NSCLC
    Chen, Ping
    Li, Yinfeng
    Jing, Xiaomei
    Chen, Jing
    Chen, Shimei
    Yang, Qing
    LUNG CANCER, 2022, 174 : 157 - 164
  • [24] Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Zhu, Youwen
    Liu, Kun
    Ding, Dong
    Zhou, Yangying
    Peng, Libo
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2022, 39 (06) : 2614 - 2629
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for biliary tract cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Li, Huan
    Li, Qian
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [26] Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Youwen Zhu
    Kun Liu
    Dong Ding
    Yangying Zhou
    Libo Peng
    Advances in Therapy, 2022, 39 : 2614 - 2629
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-Miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Wang, Hao-Lun
    Wang, Ying-Yuan
    Chen, Ze-Chang
    Zhou, Qin
    Li, Xiang-Ping
    Zhang, Ying-Ying
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (05): : 6182 - 6189
  • [28] CONSEQUENCES OF BIOMARKER ANALYSIS ON THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CETUXIMAB IN COMBINATION WITH IRINOTECAN BASED CHEMOTHERAPY FOR FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER. STRATIFIED MEDICINE AT WORK?
    Harty, G. T.
    Jarrett, J.
    Jofre-Bonet, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A456 - A456
  • [29] Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial
    Wang, Huijuan
    Huang, Lingfei
    Gao, Peng
    Zhu, Zhengyi
    Ye, Weifeng
    Ding, Haiying
    Fang, Luo
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02):
  • [30] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA IN COLOMBIA
    Nunez, S. M.
    Godoy, J., I
    Cardona, A. F.
    Otero, J. M.
    Lujan, M.
    Lopera, D.
    Carranza, H.
    Spath, A.
    Gis, P. R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A219 - A219