Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Barufaldi, Laura A. [1 ,5 ]
de Albuquerque, Rita de C. R. [1 ]
do Nascimento, Aline [1 ]
Martins, Luis Felipe L. [2 ]
Zimmermann, Ivan R. [3 ]
de Souza, Mirian C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Surveillance & Situat Anal, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Brasilia, Brazil
[4] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Populat Res, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[5] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, 125 Marques Pombal St, BR-20230240 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
antibodies; colorectal neoplasms; cost-effectiveness evaluation; health evaluation; monoclonal; neoplasm metastasis; 2ND-LINE TREATMENT; CETUXIMAB; BEVACIZUMAB; PANITUMUMAB; FOLFIRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2023.04.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab and panitumumab) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) monoclonal antibodies associated with conventional chemotherapy (CT) (fluorouracil and leucovorin with irinotecan) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: A partitioned survival analysis model was adopted to simulate direct health costs and benefits comparing thera-peutic options in a 10 years' time horizon. Model data were extracted from the literature and costs were obtained from Brazilian official government databases. The analysis considered the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System; costs were measured in local currency (BRL) and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and benefits. Alternative willingness-to-pay scenarios, varying from 3 to 5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold established in Brazil, were estimated. The results were presented incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.Results: The most cost-effective choice would be the association of CT with panitumumab, with an ICER of $58 330.15/QALY compared with isolated CT. The second-best option was CT with bevacizumab and panitumumab, with an ICER of $71195.40/ QALY compared with panitumumab alone. Although having higher costs, the second-best option was the most effective. Both strategies were cost-effective in part of the Monte Carlo iterations, considering the 33 threshold. Conclusions: The therapeutic option CT + panitumumab + bevacizumab represents the most significant effectiveness gain in our study. It is the second-lowest cost-effectiveness, and this option includes monoclonal antibodies association for patients with and without KRAS mutation.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy first-line for right-side metastatic colorectal cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Chen, Gong
    Liu, Maobai
    Li, Te
    Wu, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04)
  • [12] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CETUXIMAB AND PANITUMUMAB AS FIRST-LINE THERAPIES FOR METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER IN SPAIN
    Moreno, V
    Martinez-Amores, B.
    Barriuso, J.
    Mezquita, L.
    Ibanez de Caceres, I.
    Ayuso, A.
    Pena, J. M.
    Perona, R.
    Grande, E.
    Belda-Iniesta, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A421 - A422
  • [13] Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer
    Pei, Zhengda
    Xiao, Ningping
    Yang, Pei
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [14] Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab and panitumumab as first-line metastatic colorectal cancer therapies in Spain
    Moreno, Victor
    Martinez-Amores, Brezo
    Barriuso, Jorge
    Mezquita, Laura
    Ibanez de Caceres, Inmaculada
    Ayuso Sacido, Angel
    Maria Pena, Jose
    Perona, Rosario
    Belda-Iniesta, Cristobal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [15] Cost-effectiveness of biweekly cetuximab plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    Giuliani, Jacopo
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (07) : 1674 - 1676
  • [16] Cost-effectiveness of capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance treatment after first-line induction treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Franken, M. D.
    van Rooijen, E. M.
    May, A. M.
    Koffijberg, H.
    van Tinteren, H.
    Mol, L.
    ten Tije, A. J.
    Creemers, G. J.
    van der Velden, A. M. T.
    Tanis, B. C.
    Groot, C. A. Uyl-de
    Punt, C. J. A.
    Koopman, M.
    van Oijen, M. G. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 75 : 204 - 212
  • [17] Cetuximab and bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy first-line for left-side metastatic colorectal cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Zhang, Yanqiao
    Zheng, Tongsen
    Liu, Maobai
    Li, Te
    Wu, Bin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (04)
  • [18] A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Lange, A.
    Prenzler, A.
    Frank, M.
    Kirstein, M.
    Vogel, A.
    von der Schulenburg, J. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [19] A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Frank, M.
    Lange, A.
    Prenzler, A.
    Kirstein, M.
    Vogel, A.
    von der Schulenburg, Graf J. -M
    ONKOLOGIE, 2013, 36 : 119 - 119
  • [20] Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer
    Qin, Shuxia
    Yi, Lidan
    Li, Sini
    Tan, Chongqing
    Zeng, Xiaohui
    Wang, Liting
    Peng, Ye
    Wan, Xiaomin
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (06) : 3399 - 3408