Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Barufaldi, Laura A. [1 ,5 ]
de Albuquerque, Rita de C. R. [1 ]
do Nascimento, Aline [1 ]
Martins, Luis Felipe L. [2 ]
Zimmermann, Ivan R. [3 ]
de Souza, Mirian C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Surveillance & Situat Anal, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Brasilia, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Brasilia, Brazil
[4] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Div Populat Res, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[5] Brazilian Natl Canc Inst INCA, Hlth Technol Assessment Dept, 125 Marques Pombal St, BR-20230240 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
antibodies; colorectal neoplasms; cost-effectiveness evaluation; health evaluation; monoclonal; neoplasm metastasis; 2ND-LINE TREATMENT; CETUXIMAB; BEVACIZUMAB; PANITUMUMAB; FOLFIRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2023.04.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab and panitumumab) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) monoclonal antibodies associated with conventional chemotherapy (CT) (fluorouracil and leucovorin with irinotecan) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: A partitioned survival analysis model was adopted to simulate direct health costs and benefits comparing thera-peutic options in a 10 years' time horizon. Model data were extracted from the literature and costs were obtained from Brazilian official government databases. The analysis considered the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System; costs were measured in local currency (BRL) and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and benefits. Alternative willingness-to-pay scenarios, varying from 3 to 5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold established in Brazil, were estimated. The results were presented incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.Results: The most cost-effective choice would be the association of CT with panitumumab, with an ICER of $58 330.15/QALY compared with isolated CT. The second-best option was CT with bevacizumab and panitumumab, with an ICER of $71195.40/ QALY compared with panitumumab alone. Although having higher costs, the second-best option was the most effective. Both strategies were cost-effective in part of the Monte Carlo iterations, considering the 33 threshold. Conclusions: The therapeutic option CT + panitumumab + bevacizumab represents the most significant effectiveness gain in our study. It is the second-lowest cost-effectiveness, and this option includes monoclonal antibodies association for patients with and without KRAS mutation.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 40
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] META-ANALYSIS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF OXALIPLATIN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS IRINOTECAN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY FOR THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC ADVANCED COLORECTAL CANCER IN CHINA
    Zhang, X.
    Su, W.
    Lin, Z.
    Jian, Y.
    Xuan, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S66 - S67
  • [32] Consequences of Biomarker Analysis on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab in Combination with FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Personalised Medicine at Work
    Gerard Harty
    James Jarrett
    Mireia Jofre-Bonet
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2018, 16 : 515 - 525
  • [33] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sintilimab Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-Miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Zeng, Fan-Yuan
    Tang, Zi-Qing
    Zhou, Qin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [34] Consequences of Biomarker Analysis on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab in Combination with FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Personalised Medicine at Work
    Harty, Gerard
    Jarrett, James
    Jofre-Bonet, Mireia
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2018, 16 (04) : 515 - 525
  • [35] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF PEMBROLIZUMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY IN THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC TRIPLE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER IN GREECE
    Yfantopoulos, N.
    Gountas, I
    Athanasopoulos, C.
    Haiderali, A.
    Huang, M.
    Skroumpelos, A.
    Karokis, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S184 - S184
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan
    Shiroiwa, Takeru
    Fukuda, Takashi
    Tsutani, Kiichiro
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 29 (10) : 2256 - 2267
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China
    Zhao, Ziying
    Chen, Tongfeng
    Zhou, Zhen
    Guo, Rui
    Liu, Qiao
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness of first-line treatments for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    Ewara, E. M.
    Zaric, G. S.
    Welch, S.
    Sarma, S.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : E541 - E550
  • [39] Cost-effectiveness of biomarker-directed bevacizumab for first-line therapy of persons with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Berry, Kristin
    Bensink, Mark Eliot
    Musa, Zahra
    Shankaran, Veena
    Lin, Edward H.
    Ladabaum, Uri
    Bodnar, Carolyn
    Birt, Michael
    Ramsey, Scott David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab vs. placebo, in combination with chemotherapy, for treatment of first-line metastatic NSCLC in China
    Li, Wei
    Wan, Li
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10