Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

被引:34
|
作者
Attard, C. L. [1 ]
Brown, S. [1 ]
Alloul, K. [2 ]
Moore, M. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cornerstone Res Grp Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Sanofi Canada, Laval, PQ, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
关键词
FOLFIRINOX; gemcitabine; cost-effectiveness; pancreatic cancer; ACCORD trial; chemotherapy; quality-adjusted life year; QALY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GEMCITABINE; METAANALYSIS; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.3747/co.21.1327
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The accord 11/0402 trial demonstrated that FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) is significantly more efficacious than gemcitabine monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of first-line FOLFIRINOX compared with first-line gemcitabine for public payers in Canada. Methods A Markov model simulated the movement of MPC patients from first-line treatment until death. Overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (PFS) data were derived from accord. Published utility data and Canadian costs were applied based on time in each health state and on treatment-related adverse event (AE) rates. Costs included first-and second-line therapy, monitoring, and costs to treat AES. Two separate analyses were performed. Analysis 1 was based on trial data [first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line platinum-based chemotherapy, with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allowed], and analysis 2 used Ontario treatment patterns before FOLFIRINOX funding (first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by best supportive care, no use of G-CSF). Results Compared with first-line gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX resulted in more life-years and quality adjusted life-years (QALYS). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results showed that, for analyses 1 and 2 respectively, FOLFIRINOX has a greater than 85% probability and an approximately 80% probability of being cost-effective at the $100,000 threshold. Conclusions Compared with gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX significantly prolongs median os. Given the favourable cost per QALY, the improvement in clinical efficacy, and the limited available treatment options, FOLFIRINOX represents an attractive cost-effective treatment for MPC.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:E41 / E51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.
    Attard, Cheryl L.
    Brown, Stephen
    Alloul, Karine
    Moore, Malcolm J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (04)
  • [2] AN INDIRECT TREATMENT COMPARISON AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS COMPARING FOLFIRINOX WITH NAB-PACLITAXEL PLUS GEMCITABINE FOR FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC PANCREATIC CANCER
    Hollmann, S.
    Alloul, K.
    Attard, C.
    Kavan, P.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 : 11 - 11
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness of SLOG vs mFOLFIRINOX as the first-line treatment in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Yang, Yi-Hsin
    Wu, Chen-Hao
    Chiang, Nai-Jung
    Shan, Yan-Shen
    Bai, Li-Yuan
    Li, Chung-Pin
    Chen, Jen-Shi
    Chen, Li-Tzong
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S503 - S503
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of maintenance therapy after first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Giuliani, Jacopo
    Mantoan, Beatrice
    Bonetti, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 28 (01) : 194 - 198
  • [5] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CETUXIMAB AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES
    Ortendahl, J. D.
    Bentley, T. G.
    Anene, A. M.
    Purdum, A. G.
    Bolinder, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A86 - A86
  • [6] Atezolizumab with chemotherapy in first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Zhang, Peng-Fei
    Wen, Feng
    Wu, Qiu-Ji
    Li, Qiu
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (14) : 1021 - 1030
  • [7] The cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in England and Wales
    Tappenden, P.
    Jones, R.
    Paisley, S.
    Carroll, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (17) : 2487 - 2494
  • [8] Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States
    Shankaran, Veena
    Ortendahl, Jesse D.
    Purdum, Anna G.
    Bolinder, Bjorn
    Anene, Ayanna M.
    Sun, Gordon H.
    Bentley, Tanya G. K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 41 (01): : 65 - 72
  • [9] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS COMPARING FOLFIRINOX AND NAB-PACLITAXEL (ABARAXANE) PLUS GEMCITABINE FOR FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC PANCREATIC CANCER FROM THE US SOCIETAL PERSPECTIVE
    Cheng, W.
    Hay, J. W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A153 - A153
  • [10] Effectiveness and Tolerability of Maintenance Capecitabine Administrated to Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with First-Line FOLFIRINOX
    Reure, Juliette
    Follana, Philippe
    Gal, Jocelyn
    Evesque, Ludovic
    Cavaglione, Gerard
    Saint, Angelique
    Francois, Eric
    ONCOLOGY, 2016, 90 (05) : 261 - 266