共 50 条
Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer
被引:34
|作者:
Attard, C. L.
[1
]
Brown, S.
[1
]
Alloul, K.
[2
]
Moore, M. J.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Cornerstone Res Grp Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Sanofi Canada, Laval, PQ, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
关键词:
FOLFIRINOX;
gemcitabine;
cost-effectiveness;
pancreatic cancer;
ACCORD trial;
chemotherapy;
quality-adjusted life year;
QALY;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
GEMCITABINE;
METAANALYSIS;
BENEFIT;
D O I:
10.3747/co.21.1327
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background The accord 11/0402 trial demonstrated that FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) is significantly more efficacious than gemcitabine monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of first-line FOLFIRINOX compared with first-line gemcitabine for public payers in Canada. Methods A Markov model simulated the movement of MPC patients from first-line treatment until death. Overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (PFS) data were derived from accord. Published utility data and Canadian costs were applied based on time in each health state and on treatment-related adverse event (AE) rates. Costs included first-and second-line therapy, monitoring, and costs to treat AES. Two separate analyses were performed. Analysis 1 was based on trial data [first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line platinum-based chemotherapy, with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allowed], and analysis 2 used Ontario treatment patterns before FOLFIRINOX funding (first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by best supportive care, no use of G-CSF). Results Compared with first-line gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX resulted in more life-years and quality adjusted life-years (QALYS). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results showed that, for analyses 1 and 2 respectively, FOLFIRINOX has a greater than 85% probability and an approximately 80% probability of being cost-effective at the $100,000 threshold. Conclusions Compared with gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX significantly prolongs median os. Given the favourable cost per QALY, the improvement in clinical efficacy, and the limited available treatment options, FOLFIRINOX represents an attractive cost-effective treatment for MPC.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:E41 / E51
页数:11
相关论文