Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer

被引:34
|
作者
Attard, C. L. [1 ]
Brown, S. [1 ]
Alloul, K. [2 ]
Moore, M. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cornerstone Res Grp Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[2] Sanofi Canada, Laval, PQ, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
关键词
FOLFIRINOX; gemcitabine; cost-effectiveness; pancreatic cancer; ACCORD trial; chemotherapy; quality-adjusted life year; QALY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GEMCITABINE; METAANALYSIS; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.3747/co.21.1327
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The accord 11/0402 trial demonstrated that FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) is significantly more efficacious than gemcitabine monotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). The present study assessed the cost-effectiveness of first-line FOLFIRINOX compared with first-line gemcitabine for public payers in Canada. Methods A Markov model simulated the movement of MPC patients from first-line treatment until death. Overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (PFS) data were derived from accord. Published utility data and Canadian costs were applied based on time in each health state and on treatment-related adverse event (AE) rates. Costs included first-and second-line therapy, monitoring, and costs to treat AES. Two separate analyses were performed. Analysis 1 was based on trial data [first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by second-line platinum-based chemotherapy, with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allowed], and analysis 2 used Ontario treatment patterns before FOLFIRINOX funding (first-line FOLFIRINOX followed by second-line gemcitabine compared with first-line gemcitabine followed by best supportive care, no use of G-CSF). Results Compared with first-line gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX resulted in more life-years and quality adjusted life-years (QALYS). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results showed that, for analyses 1 and 2 respectively, FOLFIRINOX has a greater than 85% probability and an approximately 80% probability of being cost-effective at the $100,000 threshold. Conclusions Compared with gemcitabine, first-line FOLFIRINOX significantly prolongs median os. Given the favourable cost per QALY, the improvement in clinical efficacy, and the limited available treatment options, FOLFIRINOX represents an attractive cost-effective treatment for MPC.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:E41 / E51
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, and Gemcitabine With Nab-Paclitaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
    Nichetti, Federico
    Rota, Simone
    Ambrosini, Paolo
    Pircher, Chiara
    Gusmaroli, Eleonora
    Busset, Michele Droz Dit
    Pusceddu, Sara
    Sposito, Carlo
    Coppa, Jorgelina
    Morano, Federica
    Pietrantonio, Filippo
    Di Bartolomeo, Maria
    Mariani, Luigi
    Mazzaferro, Vincenzo
    de Braud, Filippo
    Niger, Monica
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [42] Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line HAART
    Maggiolo, F.
    Di Matteo, S.
    Masini, G.
    Astuti, N.
    Di Filippo, E.
    Bernardini, C.
    Soavi, L.
    Colombo, G.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2012, 15 : 69 - 70
  • [43] The efficacy and safety of modified FOLFIRINOX as first-line chemotherapy for Chinese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Wang, Zhi-Qiang
    Zhang, Fei
    Deng, Ting
    Zhang, Le
    Feng, Fen
    Wang, Feng-Hua
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, De-Shen
    Luo, Hui-Yan
    Xu, Rui-Hua
    Ba, Yi
    Li, Yu-Hong
    CANCER COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 39
  • [44] Current status of first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Ozaka, Masato
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S1363 - S1363
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness analysis of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus folfirinox in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in china
    Cui, Jiujie
    Zhang, Xiaochen
    Qu, Shuli
    Wang, Liwei
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (04) : 691 - 697
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China
    Zhao, Ziying
    Chen, Tongfeng
    Zhou, Zhen
    Guo, Rui
    Liu, Qiao
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness analysis of donafenib versus lenvatinib for first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma
    Meng, Rui
    Zhang, Xueke
    Zhou, Ting
    Luo, Mengjie
    Qiu, Yijin
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (07) : 1079 - 1086
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness analysis of sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with metastatic NSCLC
    Chen, Ping
    Li, Yinfeng
    Jing, Xiaomei
    Chen, Jing
    Chen, Shimei
    Yang, Qing
    LUNG CANCER, 2022, 174 : 157 - 164
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness of first-line treatments for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
    Ewara, E. M.
    Zaric, G. S.
    Welch, S.
    Sarma, S.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : E541 - E550
  • [50] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF AVELUMAB AS FIRST-LINE MAINTENANCE TREATMENT FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED OR METASTATIC UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA IN FINLAND
    Karttunen, E.
    Jaaskelainen, S.
    Hervonen, P.
    Chang, J.
    Kearney, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S99 - S99