Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study

被引:35
|
作者
Chen, Jianping [1 ]
Bai, Xiaolei [2 ]
Ding, Yude [1 ]
Shen, Liheng [1 ]
Sun, Xin [3 ]
Cao, Ruijue [2 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ]
Wang, Linhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Med Coll, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Med Coll, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Dental implant robotic system; Dynamic navigation system; Dental implant; Accuracy; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-023-02873-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a novel dental implant robotic system (THETA) and a dynamic navigation system ( Yizhimei) by a vitro model experiment. Methods 10 partially edentulous jaws models were included in this study, and 20 sites were randomly assigned into two groups: the dental implant robotic system (THETA) group and a dynamic navigation system (Yizhimei) group. 20 implants were placed in the defects according to each manufacturer's protocol respectively. The implant platform, apex and angle deviations were measured by fusion of the preoperative design and the actual postoperative conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) using 3D Slicer software. Data were analyzed by t - test and Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 20 implants were placed in 10 phantoms. The comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation in THETA group were 0.58 +/- 0.31 mm, 0.69 +/- 0.28 mm, and 1.08 +/- 0.66 degrees respectively, while in Yizhimei group, the comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation were 0.73 +/- 0.20 mm, 0.86 +/- 0.33 mm, and 2.32 +/- 0.71 degrees respectively. The angulation deviation in THETA group was significantly smaller than the Yizhimei group, and there was no significant difference in the deviation of the platform and apex of the implants placed using THETA and Yizhimei, respectively. Conclusion The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system, especially the angular deviation was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that the THETA robotic system could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery in the future. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the current results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An in vitro analysis of the accuracy of static and robot-assisted implant surgery
    Mozer, Paul S.
    Guentsch, Arndt
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (05) : 487 - 497
  • [22] Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study
    Ma, Feifei
    Sun, Feng
    Wei, Tai
    Ma, Yu
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03) : 352 - 360
  • [23] Accuracy Comparison between Robot-Assisted Dental Implant Placement and Static/Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies
    Jain, Saurabh
    Sayed, Mohammed E.
    Ibraheem, Wael I.
    Ageeli, Abrar A.
    Gandhi, Sumir
    Jokhadar, Hossam F.
    Alresayes, Saad Saleh
    Alqarni, Hatem
    Alshehri, Abdullah Hasan
    Huthan, Halah Mohammed
    Alami, Atheer
    Al Wadei, Mohammed Hussain Dafer
    Aljabri, Yahya
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (01):
  • [24] The accuracy of different macrogeometry of dental implant in dynamic navigation guided immediate implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic zone: an in vitro study
    Chen, Jinyan
    Yu, Xinbo
    Wu, Yiqun
    Wang, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [25] Accuracy of implant site preparation in robotic navigated dental implant surgery
    Linn, Thu Ya
    Salamanca, Eisner
    Aung, Lwin Moe
    Huang, Ta-Ko
    Wu, Yi-Fan
    Chang, Wei-Jen
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (05) : 881 - 891
  • [26] Learning curve of dynamic navigation-assisted zygomatic implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Wang, Wenying
    Zhuang, Minjie
    Tao, Baoxin
    Wang, Feng
    Wu, Yiqun
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (01): : 178e1 - 178e12
  • [27] Comparison of robotic system and dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study
    Guo, Houzuo
    Jiang, Xi
    Lin, Ye
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 150
  • [28] Influence of Metal Guide Sleeves on the Accuracy and Precision of Dental Implant Placement Using Guided Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study
    Adams, Coleman R.
    Ammoun, Rami
    Deeb, George R.
    Bencharit, Sompop
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 32 (01): : 62 - 70
  • [29] Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study
    Takacs, Anna
    Marada, Gyula
    Turzo, Kinga
    Nagy, Akos
    Nemeth, Orsolya
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    Kivovics, Marton
    Muhl, Attila
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [30] Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study
    Anna Takács
    Gyula Marada
    Kinga Turzó
    Ákos Nagy
    Orsolya Németh
    Eitan Mijiritsky
    Márton Kivovics
    Attila Mühl
    BMC Oral Health, 23