Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study

被引:35
|
作者
Chen, Jianping [1 ]
Bai, Xiaolei [2 ]
Ding, Yude [1 ]
Shen, Liheng [1 ]
Sun, Xin [3 ]
Cao, Ruijue [2 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ]
Wang, Linhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Med Coll, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Med Coll, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Dental implant robotic system; Dynamic navigation system; Dental implant; Accuracy; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-023-02873-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a novel dental implant robotic system (THETA) and a dynamic navigation system ( Yizhimei) by a vitro model experiment. Methods 10 partially edentulous jaws models were included in this study, and 20 sites were randomly assigned into two groups: the dental implant robotic system (THETA) group and a dynamic navigation system (Yizhimei) group. 20 implants were placed in the defects according to each manufacturer's protocol respectively. The implant platform, apex and angle deviations were measured by fusion of the preoperative design and the actual postoperative conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) using 3D Slicer software. Data were analyzed by t - test and Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 20 implants were placed in 10 phantoms. The comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation in THETA group were 0.58 +/- 0.31 mm, 0.69 +/- 0.28 mm, and 1.08 +/- 0.66 degrees respectively, while in Yizhimei group, the comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation were 0.73 +/- 0.20 mm, 0.86 +/- 0.33 mm, and 2.32 +/- 0.71 degrees respectively. The angulation deviation in THETA group was significantly smaller than the Yizhimei group, and there was no significant difference in the deviation of the platform and apex of the implants placed using THETA and Yizhimei, respectively. Conclusion The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system, especially the angular deviation was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that the THETA robotic system could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery in the future. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the current results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An image-guided hybrid robot system for dental implant surgery
    Feng, Yuan
    Fan, JiaCheng
    Tao, BaoXin
    Wang, ShiGang
    Mo, JinQiu
    Wu, YiQun
    Liang, QingHua
    Chen, XiaoJun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2022, 17 (01) : 15 - 26
  • [32] Accuracy of dynamic implant navigation surgery performed by a novice operator A preliminary study in a cadaveric model
    Marques-Guasch, Jordi
    Rodriguez-Bauza, Rafel
    Satorres-Nieto, Marta
    Hom-Lay, Wang
    Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico
    Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2022, 25 (04) : 377 - 385
  • [33] An image-guided hybrid robot system for dental implant surgery
    Yuan Feng
    JiaCheng Fan
    BaoXin Tao
    ShiGang Wang
    JinQiu Mo
    YiQun Wu
    QingHua Liang
    XiaoJun Chen
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2022, 17 : 15 - 26
  • [34] Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei, Shi-Min
    Zhu, Yu
    Wei, Jian-Xu
    Zhang, Chu-Nan
    Shi, Jun-Yu
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (04) : 383 - 393
  • [35] Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study
    Zhang, Sihui
    Cai, Qin
    Chen, Weiyi
    Lin, Yuxuan
    Gao, Yan
    Wu, Dong
    Chen, Jiang
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (02) : 220 - 229
  • [36] Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An in-vitro study
    Cheng, Kang-jie
    Kan, Tian-shu
    Liu, Yun-feng
    Zhu, Wei-dong
    Zhu, Fu-dong
    Wang, Wei-bin
    Jiang, Xian-feng
    Dong, Xing-tao
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 129
  • [37] Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study
    Robert Stünkel
    Alexander-Nicolai Zeller
    Thomas Bohne
    Florian Böhrnsen
    Edris Wedi
    David Raschke
    Philipp Kauffmann
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 8
  • [38] Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study
    Stuenkel, Robert
    Zeller, Alexander-Nicolai
    Bohne, Thomas
    Boehrnsen, Florian
    Wedi, Edris
    Raschke, David
    Kauffmann, Philipp
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [39] Accuracy of mucosa supported guided dental implant surgery
    Jones, Andoni
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2018, 6 (11): : 2131 - 2139
  • [40] Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study
    Kivovics, Marton
    Takacs, Anna
    Penzes, Dorottya
    Nemeth, Orsolya
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 119