Comparison the accuracy of a novel implant robot surgery and dynamic navigation system in dental implant surgery: an in vitro pilot study

被引:35
|
作者
Chen, Jianping [1 ]
Bai, Xiaolei [2 ]
Ding, Yude [1 ]
Shen, Liheng [1 ]
Sun, Xin [3 ]
Cao, Ruijue [2 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ]
Wang, Linhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Med Coll, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Med Coll, Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Dept Stomatol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Dental implant robotic system; Dynamic navigation system; Dental implant; Accuracy; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-023-02873-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background To compare the accuracy of dental implant placement using a novel dental implant robotic system (THETA) and a dynamic navigation system ( Yizhimei) by a vitro model experiment. Methods 10 partially edentulous jaws models were included in this study, and 20 sites were randomly assigned into two groups: the dental implant robotic system (THETA) group and a dynamic navigation system (Yizhimei) group. 20 implants were placed in the defects according to each manufacturer's protocol respectively. The implant platform, apex and angle deviations were measured by fusion of the preoperative design and the actual postoperative conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) using 3D Slicer software. Data were analyzed by t - test and Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 20 implants were placed in 10 phantoms. The comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation in THETA group were 0.58 +/- 0.31 mm, 0.69 +/- 0.28 mm, and 1.08 +/- 0.66 degrees respectively, while in Yizhimei group, the comparison deviation of implant platform, apex and angulation were 0.73 +/- 0.20 mm, 0.86 +/- 0.33 mm, and 2.32 +/- 0.71 degrees respectively. The angulation deviation in THETA group was significantly smaller than the Yizhimei group, and there was no significant difference in the deviation of the platform and apex of the implants placed using THETA and Yizhimei, respectively. Conclusion The implant positioning accuracy of the robotic system, especially the angular deviation was superior to that of the dynamic navigation system, suggesting that the THETA robotic system could be a promising tool in dental implant surgery in the future. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the current results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Otaghsara, Seyedeh Sahar Taheri
    Joda, Tim
    Thieringer, Florian Markus
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 132
  • [12] Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future
    Sun, Ting-Mao
    Lan, Ting-Hsun
    Pan, Chin-Yun
    Lee, Huey-Er
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 34 (01): : 56 - 64
  • [13] The effect of implant surgery experience on the learning curve of a dynamic navigation system: an in vitro study
    Xu, Zonghe
    Zhou, Lin
    Zheng, Ming
    Lin, Yanjun
    Huang, Wenxiu
    Chen, Jiang
    Li, Yan
    Wu, Dong
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [14] The effect of implant surgery experience on the learning curve of a dynamic navigation system: an in vitro study
    Zonghe Xu
    Lin Zhou
    Ming Zheng
    Yanjun Lin
    Wenxiu Huang
    Jiang Chen
    Yan Li
    Dong Wu
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [15] Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study
    Jorba-Garcia, Adria
    Figueiredo, Rui
    Gonzalez-Barnadas, Albert
    Camps-Font, Octavi
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2019, 24 (01): : E76 - E83
  • [16] Accuracy and efficiency of robotic dental implant surgery with different human-robot interactions: An in vitro study
    Xu, Zonghe
    Xiao, Yanjun
    Zhou, Lin
    Lin, Yanjun
    Su, Endian
    Chen, Jiang
    Wu, Dong
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 137
  • [17] Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice
    Stefanelli, Luigi, V
    DeGroot, Bradley S.
    Lipton, David, I
    Mandelaris, George A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (01) : 205 - 213
  • [18] Effect of implant shape and length on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant surgery: An in vitro study
    Wang, Yunxiao
    Yu, Shimin
    Wang, Yulan
    Feng, Yi
    Yan, Qi
    Zhang, Yufeng
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (03) : 350 - 357
  • [19] Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation: An in vitro study
    Tao, Baoxin
    Fan, Xingqi
    Wang, Feng
    Chen, Xiaojun
    Shen, Yihan
    Wu, Yiqun
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (01) : 196 - 202
  • [20] Accuracy of a dynamic navigation system for dental implantation with two different workflows and intraoral markers compared to static-guided implant surgery: An in-vitro study
    Struwe, Maximilian
    Leontiev, Wadim
    Connert, Thomas
    Kuhl, Sebastian
    Filippi, Andreas
    Herber, Valentin
    Dagassan-Berndt, Dorothea
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (03) : 196 - 208