Analysis of interreader agreement in structured reports of pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging using the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer guidelines

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Xiang [1 ]
Xie, Tingting [2 ]
Sun, Zhaonan [1 ]
Guo, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Advanced prostate cancer; interreader agreement; METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer; mpMRI; response assessment category; BONE METASTASES; MRI;
D O I
10.5152/dir.2022.211232
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE To evaluate interreader agreement on pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) interpretation among radiologists using a structured reporting tool based on the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer (MET-RADS-P) guidelines. METHODS A structured report for follow-up pelvic mpMRI for advanced prostate cancer (APC) patients was formulated based on MET-RADS-P guidelines. In total, 163 paired pelvic mpMRI examinations were performed from December 2017 to February 2021 on 105 patients with APC. These were retrospectively reviewed by two senior and two junior radiologists for metastatic lesion detection and were categorized by these readers using primary/secondary response assessment categories (RACs), with and without the structured report. Interreader agreement regarding metastasis detection and RAC scores was evaluated with Cohen's kappa and weighted Cohen's kappa statistics (K), respectively. RESULTS The two senior radiologists showed higher agreement with the reference standard for metastasis detection using the structured report (S1: K = 0.83; S2: K = 0.73) compared with the conventional report (S1: K = 0.72; S2: K = 0.61). Junior radiologists showed similar results (J1: 0.66 vs. 0.59; J2: 0.65 vs. 0.57). The overall agreement between the two senior radiologists was excellent for the primary RAC pattern using the structured reports (K = 0.81) and was substantial for secondary RAC categorization (K = 0.75). The interreader agreement of the two junior radiologists was substantial for both primary and secondary RAC values (K = 0.76, 0.68). CONCLUSION Good interreader agreement was found for the follow-up assessment of APC patients between radiologists, where the pelvic mpMRI was reported using MET-RADS-P guidelines. This improvement applied to both metastatic lesion detection and qualitative RAC assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 39
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INTERREADER AGREEMENT IN MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI REPORTING USING PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM VERSION 2.1
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Stabile, Armando
    Damascelli, Anna
    Cristel, Giulia
    Ravelli, Silvia
    Esposito, Antoinio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E849 - E849
  • [2] Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging
    Muller, Berrend G.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Marko, Jamie
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    George, Arvin Koruthu
    de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 277 (03) : 741 - 750
  • [3] Interreader Agreement with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lopez, Francisco
    Macpherson, Ruth
    Lamb, Alastair
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (04): : 670 - 670
  • [4] Interpreting Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Urologists' Guide Including Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System
    Christidis, Daniel
    McGrath, Shannon
    Leaney, Barry
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    UROLOGY, 2018, 111 : 136 - 138
  • [5] Comparison of Interreader Reproducibility of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert Scales for Evaluation of Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Lim, Ruth P.
    Haghighi, Mershad
    Somberg, Molly B.
    Babb, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (04) : W612 - W618
  • [6] Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
    Feng, Zhao-Yan
    Wang, Liang
    Min, Xiang-De
    Wang, Shao-Gang
    Wang, Guo-Ping
    Cai, Jie
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (20) : 2451 - 2459
  • [7] Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
    Feng ZhaoYan
    Wang Liang
    Min XiangDe
    Wang ShaoGang
    Wang GuoPing
    Cai Jie
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2016, 129 (20)
  • [8] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 Category Cases at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Maggi, Martina
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Mosca, Augusto
    Salciccia, Stefano
    Gentilucci, Alessandro
    Di Pierro, Giovanni
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Barchetti, Giovanni
    Campa, Riccardo
    Sperduti, Isabella
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (03): : 463 - 478
  • [9] Accuracy and Variability of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: A Blinded Comparison of Radiologists
    Pickersgill, Nicholas A.
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Mintz, Aaron J.
    Siegel, Cary L.
    Kim, Eric H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (02): : 267 - 272
  • [10] Interreader variability in prostate MRI reporting using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Stabile, Armando
    Damascelli, Anna
    Brunetti, Lisa
    Ravelli, Silvia
    Cristel, Giulia
    Schiani, Elena
    Venturini, Elena
    Grippaldi, Daniele
    Mendola, Vincenzo
    Rancoita, Paola Maria Vittoria
    Esposito, Antonio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Del Maschio, Alessandro
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (06) : 3383 - 3392