Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs

被引:8
|
作者
Alben, Matthew G. [1 ]
Gordon, Dan [2 ]
Gambhir, Neil [1 ]
Kim, Matthew T. [1 ]
Romeo, Paul V. [1 ]
Rokito, Andrew S. [1 ]
Zuckerman, Joseph D. [1 ]
Virk, Mandeep S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, NYU Langone Orthoped Hosp, NYU Grossman Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg,Div Shoulder & Elbow Surg, 246 East 20Th St, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
PROMIS; MCID; SCB; Effect size; Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; MEASUREMENT INFORMATION-SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDIC OUTCOMES; SHOULDER; RESPONSIVENESS; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-022-07279-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To calculate and determine what factors are associated with achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and the Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Testing v2.0 (UE), Pain Interference (P-Interference), and Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR). Methods The change in PROMIS scores representing the optimal cutoff for a ROC curve with an area under the curve analysis was used to calculate the anchor-based MCID and SCB. To assess the responsiveness of each PROM, effect sizes and standardized response means (SRM) were calculated. To identify factors associated with attaining the MCID and SCB, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 323 patients with an average age of 59.9 +/- 9.5 were enrolled in this study, of which, 187/323 [57.9%] were male and 136/323 [42.1%] were female. The anchor-based MCID for PROMIS UE, P-Interference, and P-Intensity was: 9.0, 7.5, and 11.2, respectively. The respective SCB was 10.9, 9.3, and 12.7. Effect size and SRM were: PROMIS UE (1.4, 1.3), P-Interference (1.8, 1.5), and P-Intensity (2.3, 2.0). Lower preoperative P-Intensity scores (p = 0.02), dominant arm involvement (p = 0.03), and concomitant biceps tenodesis (p = 0.03) were associated with patients achieving the SCB for PROMIS UE. Conclusion A large responsiveness for each of the PROMIS instruments due to the majority of patients reporting great improvement after aRCR and a small standard deviation across all outcome measures was shown in our study. Lower preoperative P-Intensity scores and concomitant biceps tenodesis were associated with higher odds of achieving the SCB for PROMIS UE. The knowledge of MCID and SCB values for PROMIS instruments will allow the surgeon to determine whether the improvements in the PROMIS scores after aRCR are clinically meaningful.
引用
收藏
页码:2602 / 2614
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
    Matthew G. Alben
    Dan Gordon
    Neil Gambhir
    Matthew T. Kim
    Paul V. Romeo
    Andrew S. Rokito
    Joseph D. Zuckerman
    Mandeep S. Virk
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 2602 - 2614
  • [2] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) of upper extremity PROMIS scores in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis
    Alben, Matthew G. G.
    Gambhir, Neil
    Shankar, Dhruv
    Gordon, Dan
    Zuckerman, Joseph D. D.
    Virk, Mandeep S. S.
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 42 (02) : 579 - 589
  • [3] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) of upper extremity PROMIS scores in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis
    Matthew G. Alben
    Neil Gambhir
    Dhruv Shankar
    Dan Gordon
    Joseph D. Zuckerman
    Mandeep S. Virk
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2023, 42 : 579 - 589
  • [4] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair
    Haunschild, Eric D.
    Gilat, Ron
    Fu, Michael C.
    Tauro, Tracy
    Huddleston, Hailey P.
    Yanke, Adam B.
    Forsythe, Brian
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Cole, Brian J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (14): : 3439 - 3446
  • [5] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Kim, Dong Min
    Kim, Tae Hyung
    Kholinne, Erica
    Park, Jeong Hee
    Shin, Myung Jin
    Kim, Hyojune
    Park, Dongjun
    Jeon, In-Ho
    Koh, Kyoung Hwan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (11): : 2650 - 2659
  • [6] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) following surgical knee ligament reconstruction: a systematic review
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Jeyaraman, Madhan
    Schafer, Luise
    Rath, Bjoern
    Huber, Thorsten
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [7] Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Using PROMIS CAT in Cervical Spine Surgery
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Lovecchio, Francis
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Stein, Daniel
    Ross, Thomas
    Yang, Jingyan
    Singh, Kern
    Albert, Todd J.
    Lebl, Darren
    Huang, Russel
    Sandhu, Harvinder
    Rawlins, Bernard
    Schwab, Frank
    Lafage, Virginie
    Kim, Han Jo
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (09): : 392 - 397
  • [8] Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of shoulder functional scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective study
    Aditya A Mukadam
    Shalini Nayak
    Jaap Willems
    Vivek Pandey
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2024, 144 : 1693 - 1701
  • [9] Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of shoulder functional scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective study
    Mukadam, Aditya A.
    Nayak, Shalini
    Willems, Jaap
    Pandey, Vivek
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (04) : 1693 - 1701
  • [10] Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Zeng, Gerald Joseph
    Moorthy, Vikaesh
    Hao, Ying
    Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
    JOURNAL OF ISAKOS JOINT DISORDERS & ORTHOPAEDIC SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 9 (04) : 592 - 597