Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

被引:86
|
作者
Kim, Dong Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Tae Hyung [1 ,2 ]
Kholinne, Erica [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Park, Jeong Hee [1 ,5 ]
Shin, Myung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Hyojune [1 ,2 ]
Park, Dongjun [1 ,2 ]
Jeon, In-Ho [1 ,2 ]
Koh, Kyoung Hwan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05535, South Korea
[3] Kangnam Korea Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[4] St Carolus Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Jakarta, Indonesia
[5] Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2020年 / 48卷 / 11期
关键词
rotator cuff injuries; visual analog scale; minimal clinically important difference; substantial clinical benefit; patient acceptable symptomatic state; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation; University of California; Los Angeles score; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; BACK PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE; QUANTIFYING SUCCESS; AMERICAN SHOULDER; CONSTANT SCORE; HEALTH-STATUS; SENSITIVITY; IMPROVEMENT; OUTCOMES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520943862
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) are emerging criteria for patient-based treatment assessments. However, few studies have investigated these measures after rotator cuff repair. Purpose: (1) To determine MCID, SCB, and PASS values for pain visual analog scale (pVAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. (2) To determine factors for achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from a rotator cuff surgery registry between March 2018 and February 2019. Eighty-two patients were included, and anchor questions for deriving MCID, SCB, and PASS values were applied at 1-year follow-up after the surgery. The MCID and SCB for the pVAS, ASES, SANE, and UCLA scores were then derived via 2 methods: a sensitivity- and specificity-based approach, which was used alone to derive PASS values, and a between-patients approach. Additionally, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors for achieving the MCID, SCB, and PASS. Results: All 4 scores showed acceptable areas under the curve. MCID, SCB, and PASS values for the pVAS were 1.5, 2.5, and 1.7; for ASES scores, 21.0, 26.0, and 78.0; for SANE, 13.0, 20.0, and 71.0; and for UCLA scores, 6.0, 8.0, and 23.0, respectively. Poor preoperative scores demonstrated significantly higher odds ratios (ORs) for achieving the MCID and SCB and lower ORs for achieving the PASS. Retear, large to massive tear, and older age showed lower ORs for achieving the MCID or SCB. For PASS items, male sex and biceps tenodesis had higher ORs, and older age had lower ORs. MCID, SCB, and PASS values per the sensitivity- and specificity-based approach were applied in factor analyses. Conclusion: Reliable MCID, SCB, and PASS values were obtained from patient evaluations 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Poor preoperative score (MCID and SCB), male sex, and biceps tenodesis showed higher ORs, whereas poor preoperative score (PASS), retear, large to massive tear, and older age demonstrated lower ORs.
引用
收藏
页码:2650 / 2659
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Zeng, Gerald Joseph
    Moorthy, Vikaesh
    Hao, Ying
    Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ISAKOS JOINT DISORDERS & ORTHOPAEDIC SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 9 (04) : 592 - 597
  • [2] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair
    Haunschild, Eric D.
    Gilat, Ron
    Fu, Michael C.
    Tauro, Tracy
    Huddleston, Hailey P.
    Yanke, Adam B.
    Forsythe, Brian
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Cole, Brian J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (14): : 3439 - 3446
  • [3] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability
    Scanaliato, John P.
    Green, Clare K.
    Sandler, Alexis B.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Hettrich, Carolyn M.
    Parnes, Nata
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (01): : 207 - 214
  • [4] Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction
    Khan, Adam Z.
    Vaughan, Alayna K.
    Aman, Zachary S.
    Lazarus, Mark D.
    Williams, Gerald R.
    Namdari, Surena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (09)
  • [5] Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Forsythe, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (04) : 639 - 647
  • [6] Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction
    Yeom, Ji Woong
    Kim, Dong Min
    Lee, Jun-Bum
    Hui, Ben
    Alahmadi, Basim Masoud
    Park, Jeong Hee
    Koh, Kyoung Hwan
    Jeon, In-Ho
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (12): : 3308 - 3317
  • [7] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Associated Variables for Achievement
    Maheshwer, Bhargavi
    Wong, Stephanie E.
    Polce, Evan M.
    Paul, Katlynn
    Forsythe, Brian
    Bush-Joseph, Charles
    Bach, Bernard R.
    Yanke, Adam B.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Chahla, Jorge
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2021, 37 (12): : 3479 - 3486
  • [8] Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state
    Hao, Kevin A.
    Hones, Keegan M.
    O'Keefe, Daniel S.
    Saengchote, Supreeya A.
    Burns, Madison Q.
    Wright, Jonathan O.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    Farmer, Kevin W.
    Struk, Aimee M.
    Simovitch, Ryan W.
    Schoch, Bradley S.
    King, Joseph J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (10) : e516 - e527
  • [9] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
    Matthew G. Alben
    Dan Gordon
    Neil Gambhir
    Matthew T. Kim
    Paul V. Romeo
    Andrew S. Rokito
    Joseph D. Zuckerman
    Mandeep S. Virk
    [J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 2602 - 2614
  • [10] Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
    Alben, Matthew G.
    Gordon, Dan
    Gambhir, Neil
    Kim, Matthew T.
    Romeo, Paul V.
    Rokito, Andrew S.
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    Virk, Mandeep S.
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2023, 31 (07) : 2602 - 2614