Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

被引:0
|
作者
Zeng, Gerald Joseph [1 ]
Moorthy, Vikaesh [1 ]
Hao, Ying [2 ]
Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Outram Rd, Singapore 169608, Singapore
[2] Singhlth Hlth Serv Res Ctr HSRC, 20 Coll Rd,Acad,Discovery Tower,Level 6, Singapore 169856, Singapore
关键词
Rotator cuff; Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; Prognostic factors; Shoulder function; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; ELBOW SURGEONS SCORE; IMPORTANT-IMPROVEMENT; QUANTIFYING SUCCESS; AMERICAN SHOULDER; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jisako.2024.05.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is commonly assessed with patientreported outcome measures (PROMs), and there is an increased need to establish clinical relevance within these measures. The purpose of this study was to (1) define minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR, and (2) identify preoperative predictors of achieving each of these threshold values. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair study between 2010 and 2016 were prospectively collected. Baseline data and VAS pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. MCID, PASS and SCB were determined using an anchor-based approach, with anchor questions assessing postoperative satisfaction and expectation fulfillment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also used to identify preoperative predictors for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB. Results: A total of 286 patients were included in the final analysis, with an average age of 60.2 + 10.4 and the majority being female (61.2%). The values for the VAS pain score identified to represent MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year postoperatively were: 5, 2, and 1. The rates of achieving clinically significant improvement based on VAS were 60.5%, 63.3%, and 57.2%, respectively. A higher preoperative VAS was predictive for achieving MCID (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study identified threshold VAS pain scores of 5, 2, and 1 for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A higher preoperative VAS pain score was also identified as a statistically significant predictor of attaining MCID after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 597
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Kim, Dong Min
    Kim, Tae Hyung
    Kholinne, Erica
    Park, Jeong Hee
    Shin, Myung Jin
    Kim, Hyojune
    Park, Dongjun
    Jeon, In-Ho
    Koh, Kyoung Hwan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (11): : 2650 - 2659
  • [2] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair
    Haunschild, Eric D.
    Gilat, Ron
    Fu, Michael C.
    Tauro, Tracy
    Huddleston, Hailey P.
    Yanke, Adam B.
    Forsythe, Brian
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Cole, Brian J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (14): : 3439 - 3446
  • [3] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability
    Scanaliato, John P.
    Green, Clare K.
    Sandler, Alexis B.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Hettrich, Carolyn M.
    Parnes, Nata
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (01): : 207 - 214
  • [4] Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction
    Khan, Adam Z.
    Vaughan, Alayna K.
    Aman, Zachary S.
    Lazarus, Mark D.
    Williams, Gerald R.
    Namdari, Surena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (09)
  • [5] Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Forsythe, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (04) : 639 - 647
  • [6] Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction
    Yeom, Ji Woong
    Kim, Dong Min
    Lee, Jun-Bum
    Hui, Ben
    Alahmadi, Basim Masoud
    Park, Jeong Hee
    Koh, Kyoung Hwan
    Jeon, In-Ho
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (12): : 3308 - 3317
  • [7] Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy
    Martin, RobRoy L.
    Kivlan, Benjamin R.
    Christoforetti, John J.
    Wolff, Andrew B.
    Nho, Shane J.
    Salvo, John P., Jr.
    Ellis, Thomas J.
    Van Thiel, Geoff
    Matsuda, Dean
    Carreira, Dominic S.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (07): : 2064 - 2069
  • [8] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Oxford, Constant, and UCLA shoulder score for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Xu, Sheng
    Chen, Jerry Yongqiang
    Lie, Hannah Mei En
    Hao, Ying
    Lie, Denny Tjiauw Tjoen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 19 : 21 - 27
  • [9] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit for the Pain Visual Analog Scale in a Postoperative Hand Surgery Population
    Randall, Dustin J.
    Zhang, Yue
    Li, Haojia
    Hubbard, James C.
    Kazmers, Nikolas H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 47 (07): : 645 - 653
  • [10] Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease
    Tashjian, Robert Z.
    Deloach, Julia
    Porucznik, Christina A.
    Powell, Amy P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (06) : 927 - 932