Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs

被引:8
|
作者
Alben, Matthew G. [1 ]
Gordon, Dan [2 ]
Gambhir, Neil [1 ]
Kim, Matthew T. [1 ]
Romeo, Paul V. [1 ]
Rokito, Andrew S. [1 ]
Zuckerman, Joseph D. [1 ]
Virk, Mandeep S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, NYU Langone Orthoped Hosp, NYU Grossman Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg,Div Shoulder & Elbow Surg, 246 East 20Th St, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
PROMIS; MCID; SCB; Effect size; Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; MEASUREMENT INFORMATION-SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDIC OUTCOMES; SHOULDER; RESPONSIVENESS; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-022-07279-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To calculate and determine what factors are associated with achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and the Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Testing v2.0 (UE), Pain Interference (P-Interference), and Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR). Methods The change in PROMIS scores representing the optimal cutoff for a ROC curve with an area under the curve analysis was used to calculate the anchor-based MCID and SCB. To assess the responsiveness of each PROM, effect sizes and standardized response means (SRM) were calculated. To identify factors associated with attaining the MCID and SCB, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 323 patients with an average age of 59.9 +/- 9.5 were enrolled in this study, of which, 187/323 [57.9%] were male and 136/323 [42.1%] were female. The anchor-based MCID for PROMIS UE, P-Interference, and P-Intensity was: 9.0, 7.5, and 11.2, respectively. The respective SCB was 10.9, 9.3, and 12.7. Effect size and SRM were: PROMIS UE (1.4, 1.3), P-Interference (1.8, 1.5), and P-Intensity (2.3, 2.0). Lower preoperative P-Intensity scores (p = 0.02), dominant arm involvement (p = 0.03), and concomitant biceps tenodesis (p = 0.03) were associated with patients achieving the SCB for PROMIS UE. Conclusion A large responsiveness for each of the PROMIS instruments due to the majority of patients reporting great improvement after aRCR and a small standard deviation across all outcome measures was shown in our study. Lower preoperative P-Intensity scores and concomitant biceps tenodesis were associated with higher odds of achieving the SCB for PROMIS UE. The knowledge of MCID and SCB values for PROMIS instruments will allow the surgeon to determine whether the improvements in the PROMIS scores after aRCR are clinically meaningful.
引用
收藏
页码:2602 / 2614
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction
    Yeom, Ji Woong
    Kim, Dong Min
    Lee, Jun-Bum
    Hui, Ben
    Alahmadi, Basim Masoud
    Park, Jeong Hee
    Koh, Kyoung Hwan
    Jeon, In-Ho
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (12): : 3308 - 3317
  • [22] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the PROMIS Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test Version 2.0 in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population
    Kazmers, Nikolas H.
    Qiu, Yuqing
    Yoo, Minkyoung
    Stephens, Andrew R.
    Zeidan, Michelle
    Zhang, Yue
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 46 (10): : 927.e1 - 927.e10
  • [23] Does the addition of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) pain instruments improve the sensitivity of PROMIS upper extremity scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?
    Alben, Matthew G.
    V. Romeo, Paul
    Papalia, Aidan G.
    Cecora, Andrew J.
    Kwon, Young W.
    Rokito, Andrew S.
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    Virk, Mandeep S.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (02) : 595 - 605
  • [24] Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS) Applied to the SF-36 in Patients Who Underwent Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    De Salvatore, Sergio
    Piergentili, Ilaria
    Lalli, Alberto
    Bandini, Benedetta
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [25] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability
    Scanaliato, John P.
    Green, Clare K.
    Sandler, Alexis B.
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Hettrich, Carolyn M.
    Parnes, Nata
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (01): : 207 - 214
  • [26] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the PROMIS Upper-Extremity Computer Adaptive Test and QuickDASH for Ligament Reconstruction Tendon Interposition Patients
    Kazmers, Nikolas H.
    Qiu, Yuqing
    Ou, Zhining
    Presson, Angela P.
    Tyser, Andrew R.
    Zhang, Yue
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 46 (06): : 516 - 516.e7
  • [27] Establishing minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after biceps tenodesis
    Puzzitiello, Richard N.
    Gowd, Anirudh K.
    Liu, Joseph N.
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Forsythe, Brian
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (04) : 639 - 647
  • [28] Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy
    Martin, RobRoy L.
    Kivlan, Benjamin R.
    Christoforetti, John J.
    Wolff, Andrew B.
    Nho, Shane J.
    Salvo, John P., Jr.
    Ellis, Thomas J.
    Van Thiel, Geoff
    Matsuda, Dean
    Carreira, Dominic S.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (07): : 2064 - 2069
  • [29] Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool
    Martin, RobRoy L.
    Kivlan, Benjamin R.
    Christoforetti, John J.
    Wolff, Andrew B.
    Nho, Shane J.
    Salvo, John P., Jr.
    Ellis, Thomas J.
    Van Thiel, Geoff
    Matsuda, Dean K.
    Carreira, Dominic S.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (02): : 411 - 416
  • [30] Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit for the Pain Visual Analog Scale in a Postoperative Hand Surgery Population
    Randall, Dustin J.
    Zhang, Yue
    Li, Haojia
    Hubbard, James C.
    Kazmers, Nikolas H.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2022, 47 (07): : 645 - 653