Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) of upper extremity PROMIS scores following arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs

被引:8
|
作者
Alben, Matthew G. [1 ]
Gordon, Dan [2 ]
Gambhir, Neil [1 ]
Kim, Matthew T. [1 ]
Romeo, Paul V. [1 ]
Rokito, Andrew S. [1 ]
Zuckerman, Joseph D. [1 ]
Virk, Mandeep S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, NYU Langone Orthoped Hosp, NYU Grossman Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg,Div Shoulder & Elbow Surg, 246 East 20Th St, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Med Ctr Dallas, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
PROMIS; MCID; SCB; Effect size; Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; MEASUREMENT INFORMATION-SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDIC OUTCOMES; SHOULDER; RESPONSIVENESS; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-022-07279-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To calculate and determine what factors are associated with achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and the Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Testing v2.0 (UE), Pain Interference (P-Interference), and Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (aRCR). Methods The change in PROMIS scores representing the optimal cutoff for a ROC curve with an area under the curve analysis was used to calculate the anchor-based MCID and SCB. To assess the responsiveness of each PROM, effect sizes and standardized response means (SRM) were calculated. To identify factors associated with attaining the MCID and SCB, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 323 patients with an average age of 59.9 +/- 9.5 were enrolled in this study, of which, 187/323 [57.9%] were male and 136/323 [42.1%] were female. The anchor-based MCID for PROMIS UE, P-Interference, and P-Intensity was: 9.0, 7.5, and 11.2, respectively. The respective SCB was 10.9, 9.3, and 12.7. Effect size and SRM were: PROMIS UE (1.4, 1.3), P-Interference (1.8, 1.5), and P-Intensity (2.3, 2.0). Lower preoperative P-Intensity scores (p = 0.02), dominant arm involvement (p = 0.03), and concomitant biceps tenodesis (p = 0.03) were associated with patients achieving the SCB for PROMIS UE. Conclusion A large responsiveness for each of the PROMIS instruments due to the majority of patients reporting great improvement after aRCR and a small standard deviation across all outcome measures was shown in our study. Lower preoperative P-Intensity scores and concomitant biceps tenodesis were associated with higher odds of achieving the SCB for PROMIS UE. The knowledge of MCID and SCB values for PROMIS instruments will allow the surgeon to determine whether the improvements in the PROMIS scores after aRCR are clinically meaningful.
引用
收藏
页码:2602 / 2614
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Editorial Commentary: The Alphabet Soup of Understanding Clinical Shoulder Research: MCID (Minimal Clinically Important Difference), PASS (Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State), SCB (Substantial Clinical Bene fi t), and Now ... MOI (Maximal Outcome Improvement) ...
    Tashjian, Robert
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2020, 36 (07): : 1811 - 1812
  • [32] Use of Area Deprivation Index to Predict Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Shaikh, Hashim J. F.
    Anderson, Devon E.
    Chait, Alexander R.
    Ramirez, Gabriel
    Bronstein, Robert D.
    Goldblatt, John P.
    Giordano, Brian D.
    Maloney, Michael D.
    Nicandri, Gregg T.
    Voloshin, Ilya
    Mannava, Sandeep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (11): : 2815 - 2823
  • [33] Minimal clinically important differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale pain scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Tashjian, Robert Z.
    Shin, Jessica
    Broschinsky, Kortnie
    Yeh, Chih-Ching
    Martin, Brook
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Greis, Patrick E.
    Burks, Robert T.
    Zhang, Yue
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (07) : 1406 - 1411
  • [34] The Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Patients Undergoing Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee
    Ogura, Takahiro
    Ackermann, Jakob
    Mestriner, Alexandre Barbieri
    Merkely, Gergo
    Gomoll, Andreas H.
    CARTILAGE, 2021, 12 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [35] Guidelines for Proper Reporting of Clinical Significance, Including Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Maximal Outcome Improvement
    Harris, Joshua D.
    Brand, Jefferson C.
    Cote, Mark
    Waterman, Brian
    Dhawan, Aman
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2023, 39 (02): : 145 - 150
  • [36] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Favian Su
    Sachin Allahabadi
    Dale N. Bongbong
    Brian T. Feeley
    Drew A. Lansdown
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2021, 14 : 27 - 46
  • [37] Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Outcome Measures Relating to Shoulder Pathology and Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Su, Favian
    Allahabadi, Sachin
    Bongbong, Dale N.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    Lansdown, Drew A.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 (01) : 27 - 46
  • [38] Invited commentary on 'different minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index when using the same sample of patients'
    George, Steven
    JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2013, 21 (02) : 79 - 80
  • [39] Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state
    Hao, Kevin A.
    Hones, Keegan M.
    O'Keefe, Daniel S.
    Saengchote, Supreeya A.
    Burns, Madison Q.
    Wright, Jonathan O.
    Wright, Thomas W.
    Farmer, Kevin W.
    Struk, Aimee M.
    Simovitch, Ryan W.
    Schoch, Bradley S.
    King, Joseph J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (10) : e516 - e527
  • [40] The likelihood of reaching minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at 2 years following a 3-column osteotomy: analysis of 140 patients
    Fakurnejad, Shayan
    Scheer, Justin K.
    Lafage, Virginie
    Smith, Justin S.
    Deviren, Vedat
    Hostin, Richard
    Mundis, Gregory M., Jr.
    Burton, Douglas C.
    Klineberg, Eric
    Gupta, Munish
    Kebaish, Khaled
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Bess, Shay
    Schwab, Frank
    Ames, Christopher P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 23 (03) : 340 - 348