Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

被引:11
|
作者
Levesque, Thomas [1 ]
Eltchaninoff, Helene [1 ]
Chabannes, Romain [1 ]
Barbe, Thomas [1 ]
Dosseh, Olivier [1 ]
Tron, Christophe [1 ]
Bettinger, Nicolas [1 ]
Bouhzam, Najime [1 ]
Hemery, Thibaut [1 ]
le Pessec, Guillaume [1 ]
Fauvel, Charles [1 ]
Cribier, Alain [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [2 ]
Durand, Eric [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Normandie Univ, Dept Cardiol, UNIROUEN, U1096,CHU Rouen, Rouen, France
[2] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Dept Cardiol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Charles Nicolle Hosp, Dept Cardiol, 1 rue Germont, Rouen, France
关键词
HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; CLINICAL IMPACT; TRIAL; CALCIFICATION; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cjca.2023.09.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Data on the long-term impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain sparse. We therefore aimed to investigate the incidence, predictive factors, and long-term prognostic impact of PPM on bioprosthesis durability and mortality. Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study including 2117 patients who underwent TAVR for aortic stenosis from 2002 to 2022. Moderate PPM was defined by indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) > 0.65 and <= 0.85 cm(2)/m(2) (> 0.55 and <= 0.70 cm(2)/m(2) if BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) and severe PPM by an iEOA <= 0.65 cm(2)/m(2) (<= 0.55 cm(2)/m(2) If BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)). Results: There were 351 patients (16.6%) with PPM, including 39 patients (1.8%) with severe PPM and 312 patients (14.7%) with moderate PPM. The mean follow-up duration was 31.2 +/- 26.5 months. Factors independently associated with the occurrence of PPM were body surface area (odds ratio [OR] 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-8.35; P = 0.01), valve-in-valve TAVR (OR 6.12, 95% CI 2.29-16.08; P < 0.001), small annulus (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.41-4.07; P = 0.001), and the use of a balloon-expandable valve (OR 4.17, 95% CI 2.17-8.33; P < 0.001). PPM was associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, P = 0.004) and valve thrombosis (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.4-12.6, P = 0.01), and a trend towards increased risk of structural valve deterioration (HR 1.7, 95% CI 0.9-2.9; P = 0.08). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that PPM has a negative long-term impact on outcomes after TAVR. These findings emphasise the importance of preventing PPM.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical study of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement
    武忠
    ChinaMedicalAbstracts(Surgery), 2011, 20 (03) : 184 - 184
  • [42] Predictors and Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement
    Dayan, Victor
    Vignolo, Gustavo
    Soca, Gerardo
    Paganini, Juan Jose
    Brusich, Daniel
    Pibarot, Philippe
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2016, 9 (08) : 924 - 933
  • [43] Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement
    Rao, V
    Jamieson, WRE
    Ivanov, J
    Armstrong, S
    David, TE
    CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (19) : 5 - 9
  • [44] Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on early and late mortality after aortic valve replacement
    Koene, Bart M.
    Hamad, Mohamed A. Soliman
    Bouma, Wobbe
    Mariani, Massimo A.
    Peels, Kathinka C.
    van Dantzig, Jan-Melle
    van Straten, Albert H.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 8
  • [45] Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement: Is It Time for a Redefinition?
    Mannacio, Vito
    De Amicis, Vincenzo
    Vosa, Carlo
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 97 (04): : 1482 - 1482
  • [46] Association between the Mean Platelet Volume and Prosthesis-patient Mismatch after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Morita, Yuichi
    Ikenaga, Hiroki
    Takeda, Atsushi
    Nakano, Takayuki
    Higashihara, Tasuku
    Watanabe, Noriaki
    Sada, Yoshiharu
    Utsunomiya, Hiroto
    Takahashi, Shinya
    Fukuda, Yukihiro
    Nakano, Yukiko
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [47] Discongruence Index - Simple Indicator to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement -
    Alberto de Agustin, Jose
    Islas, Fabian
    Jimenez-Quevedo, Pilar
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Rueda Linares, Andrea
    Mahia, Patricia
    Marcos-Alberca, Pedro
    Pozo, Eduardo
    Gomez de Diego, Jose Juan
    Luaces, Maria
    Nunez-Gil, Ivan-Javier
    Angel Garcia-Fernandez, Miguel
    Fernandez-Ortiz, Antonio
    Macaya, Carlos
    Perez de Isla, Leopoldo
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2018, 82 (11) : 2880 - 2886
  • [48] Hybrid Imaging to Assess Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement In Search of Validation
    Pislaru, Sorin V.
    Nkomo, Vuyisile T.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (15) : 1588 - 1590
  • [49] Incidence and impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Seoudy, Hatim
    Guessefeld, Nathalie
    Frank, Johanne
    Freitag-Wolf, Sandra
    Lutter, Georg
    Eden, Matthias
    Rangrez, AshrafYusuf
    Kuhn, Christian
    Frey, Norbert
    Frank, Derk
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 108 (06) : 660 - 668
  • [50] Prosthesis-patient mismatch is an independent predictor of congestive heart failure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Theron, Alexis
    Lavagna, Flora
    Gaubert, Guillaume
    Resseguier, Noemie
    Porto, Alizee
    Ferrara, Jerome
    Jaussaud, Nicolas
    Morera, Pierre
    Cuisset, Thomas
    Deharo, Pierre
    Collart, Frederic
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 114 (6-7) : 504 - 514