Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

被引:11
|
作者
Levesque, Thomas [1 ]
Eltchaninoff, Helene [1 ]
Chabannes, Romain [1 ]
Barbe, Thomas [1 ]
Dosseh, Olivier [1 ]
Tron, Christophe [1 ]
Bettinger, Nicolas [1 ]
Bouhzam, Najime [1 ]
Hemery, Thibaut [1 ]
le Pessec, Guillaume [1 ]
Fauvel, Charles [1 ]
Cribier, Alain [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [2 ]
Durand, Eric [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Normandie Univ, Dept Cardiol, UNIROUEN, U1096,CHU Rouen, Rouen, France
[2] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Dept Cardiol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Charles Nicolle Hosp, Dept Cardiol, 1 rue Germont, Rouen, France
关键词
HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; CLINICAL IMPACT; TRIAL; CALCIFICATION; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cjca.2023.09.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Data on the long-term impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain sparse. We therefore aimed to investigate the incidence, predictive factors, and long-term prognostic impact of PPM on bioprosthesis durability and mortality. Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study including 2117 patients who underwent TAVR for aortic stenosis from 2002 to 2022. Moderate PPM was defined by indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) > 0.65 and <= 0.85 cm(2)/m(2) (> 0.55 and <= 0.70 cm(2)/m(2) if BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) and severe PPM by an iEOA <= 0.65 cm(2)/m(2) (<= 0.55 cm(2)/m(2) If BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)). Results: There were 351 patients (16.6%) with PPM, including 39 patients (1.8%) with severe PPM and 312 patients (14.7%) with moderate PPM. The mean follow-up duration was 31.2 +/- 26.5 months. Factors independently associated with the occurrence of PPM were body surface area (odds ratio [OR] 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-8.35; P = 0.01), valve-in-valve TAVR (OR 6.12, 95% CI 2.29-16.08; P < 0.001), small annulus (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.41-4.07; P = 0.001), and the use of a balloon-expandable valve (OR 4.17, 95% CI 2.17-8.33; P < 0.001). PPM was associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, P = 0.004) and valve thrombosis (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.4-12.6, P = 0.01), and a trend towards increased risk of structural valve deterioration (HR 1.7, 95% CI 0.9-2.9; P = 0.08). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that PPM has a negative long-term impact on outcomes after TAVR. These findings emphasise the importance of preventing PPM.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: prevalence and medium term prognostic impact
    María del Carmen León del Pino
    Martín Ruíz Ortiz
    Mónica Delgado Ortega
    José Sánchez Fernández
    Carlos Ferreiro Quero
    Enrique Durán Jiménez
    Miguel Romero Moreno
    José Segura Saint-Gerons
    Soledad Ojeda Pineda
    Manuel Pan Álvarez-Ossorio
    Dolores Mesa Rubio
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2019, 35 : 827 - 836
  • [22] Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Has It Become Obsolete?
    Ternacle, Julien
    Abbas, Amr E.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (09) : 977 - 980
  • [23] Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on mitral regurgitation after aortic valve replacement
    Unger, P.
    Magne, J.
    Eynden, F. Vanden
    Plein, D.
    Van Camp, G.
    Pasquet, A.
    Cosyns, B.
    Dedobbeleer, C.
    Lancellotti, P.
    HEART, 2010, 96 (20) : 1627 - 1632
  • [24] The relevance of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Dumesnil, Jean G.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (12): : 764 - 765
  • [25] PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH BETWEEN TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVES IN TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
    Sengupta, Aditya
    Zaid, Syed
    Storch, Jason
    Gupta, Eisha
    Hirji, Sameer
    Ahmad, Hasan
    Khan, Asaad
    Undemir, Cenap
    Ali, Omar
    Skiles, Jeffrey
    Goldberg, Joshua
    Lansman, Steven
    Kovacic, Jason
    Dangas, George D.
    Sharma, Samin K.
    Kini, Annapoorna Subhash
    Ramlawi, Basel
    Shah, Pinak
    Kaneko, Tsuyoshi
    Tang, Gilbert
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 1421 - 1421
  • [27] Hemodynamic and Clinical Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Ewe, See Hooi
    Muratori, Manuela
    Delgado, Victoria
    Pepi, Mauro
    Tamborini, Gloria
    Fusini, Laura
    Klautz, Robert J. M.
    Gripari, Paola
    Bax, Jeroen J.
    Fusari, Melissa
    Schalij, Martin J.
    Marsan, Nina Ajmone
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (18) : 1910 - 1918
  • [28] Incidence and Prognosis of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis
    Yamanaka, Futoshi
    Shishido, Koki
    Moriyama, Noriaki
    Ochiai, Tomoki
    Miyashita, Hirokazu
    Yokoyama, Hiroaki
    Sugiyama, Yoichi
    Yashima, Fumiaki
    Ohno, Yohei
    Nishina, Hidetaka
    Izumo, Masaki
    Asami, Masahiko
    Naganuma, Toru
    Mizutani, Kazuki
    Yamawaki, Masahiro
    Tada, Norio
    Shirai, Shinichi
    Noguchi, Masahiko
    Ueno, Hiroshi
    Takagi, Kensuke
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Yamamoto, Masanori
    Saito, Shigeru
    Hayashida, Kentaro
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2025, 18 (04) : 492 - 502
  • [29] Prevalence and prognostic impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    Schofer, N.
    Deuschl, F. D.
    Ruebsamen, N. R.
    Seiffert, M. S.
    Voigtlaender, L. V.
    Schaefer, A. S.
    Schneeberger, Y. S.
    Schirmer, J. S.
    Lubos, E. L.
    Reichenspurner, H. R.
    Blankenberg, S. B.
    Conradi, L. C.
    Schaefer, U. S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 1250 - 1251
  • [30] Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Lower the Guard or Stay Alert?
    Ternacle, Julien
    Theron, Alexis
    Pibarot, Philippe
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (22) : 2636 - 2638