Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

被引:11
|
作者
Levesque, Thomas [1 ]
Eltchaninoff, Helene [1 ]
Chabannes, Romain [1 ]
Barbe, Thomas [1 ]
Dosseh, Olivier [1 ]
Tron, Christophe [1 ]
Bettinger, Nicolas [1 ]
Bouhzam, Najime [1 ]
Hemery, Thibaut [1 ]
le Pessec, Guillaume [1 ]
Fauvel, Charles [1 ]
Cribier, Alain [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [2 ]
Durand, Eric [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Normandie Univ, Dept Cardiol, UNIROUEN, U1096,CHU Rouen, Rouen, France
[2] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Dept Cardiol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Charles Nicolle Hosp, Dept Cardiol, 1 rue Germont, Rouen, France
关键词
HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; CLINICAL IMPACT; TRIAL; CALCIFICATION; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cjca.2023.09.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Data on the long-term impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain sparse. We therefore aimed to investigate the incidence, predictive factors, and long-term prognostic impact of PPM on bioprosthesis durability and mortality. Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study including 2117 patients who underwent TAVR for aortic stenosis from 2002 to 2022. Moderate PPM was defined by indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) > 0.65 and <= 0.85 cm(2)/m(2) (> 0.55 and <= 0.70 cm(2)/m(2) if BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) and severe PPM by an iEOA <= 0.65 cm(2)/m(2) (<= 0.55 cm(2)/m(2) If BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)). Results: There were 351 patients (16.6%) with PPM, including 39 patients (1.8%) with severe PPM and 312 patients (14.7%) with moderate PPM. The mean follow-up duration was 31.2 +/- 26.5 months. Factors independently associated with the occurrence of PPM were body surface area (odds ratio [OR] 3.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-8.35; P = 0.01), valve-in-valve TAVR (OR 6.12, 95% CI 2.29-16.08; P < 0.001), small annulus (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.41-4.07; P = 0.001), and the use of a balloon-expandable valve (OR 4.17, 95% CI 2.17-8.33; P < 0.001). PPM was associated with increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, P = 0.004) and valve thrombosis (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.4-12.6, P = 0.01), and a trend towards increased risk of structural valve deterioration (HR 1.7, 95% CI 0.9-2.9; P = 0.08). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that PPM has a negative long-term impact on outcomes after TAVR. These findings emphasise the importance of preventing PPM.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Based on Energy Loss Index After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Okuno, Taishi
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    Heg, Dik
    Stortecky, Stefan
    Praz, Fabien
    Windecker, Stephan
    Lanz, Jonas
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (21) : 2584 - 2586
  • [32] Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A New Technology With an Old Problem
    Ortoleva, Jamel P.
    Gonzalez-Ciccarelli, Luis F.
    Kawabori, Masashi
    Cobey, Frederick C.
    Resor, Charles D.
    Shapeton, Alexander D.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2021, 35 (08) : 2253 - 2255
  • [33] Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement It Is Neither Rare Nor Benign
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (22) : 2712 - 2716
  • [34] Multidetector CT predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Freeman, Melanie
    Webb, John G.
    Willson, Alexander B.
    Wheeler, Miriam
    Blanke, Philipp
    Moss, Robert R.
    Thompson, Christopher R.
    Munt, Brad
    Norgaard, Bjarne L.
    Yang, Tae-Hyun
    Min, James K.
    Poulsen, Steen
    Hansson, Nicolaj C.
    Binder, Ronald K.
    Toggweiler, Stefan
    Hague, Cameron
    Wood, David A.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Leipsic, Jonathon
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2013, 7 (04) : 248 - 255
  • [35] Long-term outcome of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Compagnone, Miriam
    Marchetti, Giulia
    Taglieri, Nevio
    Ghetti, Gabriele
    Bruno, Antonio Giulio
    Orzalkiewicz, Mateusz
    Marrozzini, Cinzia
    Reggiani, Maria-Letizia Bacchi
    Palmerini, Tullio
    Galie, Nazzareno
    Saia, Francesco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 318 : 27 - 31
  • [36] Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Of Asians and Non-Asians
    Wang, Jian'an
    He, Yuxin
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (24) : 2682 - 2684
  • [37] Impact of prosthesis-iteration evolution and sizing practice on the incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Abdelghani, Mohammad
    Allali, Abdelhakim
    Kaur, Jatinderjit
    Hemetsberger, Rayyan
    Mehilli, Julinda
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Frerker, Christian
    Kurz, Thomas
    El-Mawardy, Mohamed
    Richardt, Gert
    Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 93 (05) : 971 - 979
  • [38] Impact of Suture Techniques for Aortic Valve Replacement on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch
    Kim, Hyo-Hyun
    Lee, Sak
    Joo, Hyun-Chel
    Kim, Jung-Hwan
    Youn, Young-Nam
    Yoo, Kyung-Jong
    Lee, Seung-Hyun
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 109 (03): : 661 - 667
  • [39] Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on early haemodynamic status after aortic valve replacement
    Kindo, Michel
    Minh, Tam Hoang
    Perrier, Stephanie
    Petit-Eisenmann, Helene
    Bentz, Jonathan
    Cristinar, Mircea
    Ajob, Gharib
    Collange, Olivier
    Mazzucotelli, Jean-Philippe
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 24 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [40] Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on early and late mortality after aortic valve replacement
    Bart M Koene
    Mohamed A Soliman Hamad
    Wobbe Bouma
    Massimo A Mariani
    Kathinka C Peels
    Jan-Melle van Dantzig
    Albert H van Straten
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 8