A comparative analysis of intravenous infusion methods for low-resource environments

被引:1
|
作者
Tomobi, Oluwakemi [1 ,2 ]
Avoian, Samantha [3 ]
Ekwere, Ifeoma [4 ]
Waghmare, Shivani [5 ]
Diaban, Fatima [6 ]
Davis, Gabrielle [5 ]
Sy, Yacine [7 ]
Ogbonna, Oluchi [8 ]
Streete, Kevin [4 ]
Aryee, Ebenezer [7 ]
Kulasingham, Vasanthini [4 ]
Sampson, John B. [4 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Morgantown, WV USA
[2] Howard Community Coll, Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Columbia, MD USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Howard Univ, Coll Med, Washington, DC USA
[6] Advocate Aurora Hlth, Downers Grove, IL USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; global health disparities; critically ill; low-resource setting; intravenous infusion therapy; sedation; INTENSIVE-CARE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PUMP;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1326144
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Intravenous (IV) therapy is a crucial aspect of care for the critically ill patient. Barriers to IV infusion pumps in low-resource settings include high costs, lack of access to electricity, and insufficient technical support. Inaccuracy of traditional drop-counting practices places patients at risk. By conducting a comparative assessment of IV infusion methods, we analyzed the efficacy of different devices and identified one that most effectively bridges the gap between accuracy, cost, and electricity reliance in low-resource environments.Methods In this prospective mixed methods study, nurses, residents, and medical students used drop counting, a manual flow regulator, an infusion pump, a DripAssist, and a DripAssist with manual flow regulator to collect normal saline at goal rates of 240, 120, and 60 mL/h. Participants' station setup time was recorded, and the amount of fluid collected in 10 min was recorded (in milliliters). Participants then filled out a post-trial survey to rate each method (on a scale of 1 to 5) in terms of understandability, time consumption, and operability. Cost-effectiveness for use in low-resource settings was also evaluated.Results The manual flow regulator had the fastest setup time, was the most cost effective, and was rated as the least time consuming to use and the easiest to understand and operate. In contrast, the combination of the DripAssist and manual flow regulator was the most time consuming to use and the hardest to understand and operate.Conclusion The manual flow regulator alone was the least time consuming and easiest to operate. The DripAssist/Manual flow regulator combination increases accuracy, but this combination was the most difficult to operate. In addition, the manual flow regulator was the most cost-effective. Healthcare providers can adapt these devices to their practice environments and improve the safety of rate-sensitive IV medications without significant strain on electricity, time, or personnel resources.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic review of the effectiveness of training in emergency obstetric care in low-resource environments
    van Lonkhuijzen, L.
    Dijkman, A.
    van Roosmalen, J.
    Zeeman, G.
    Scherpbier, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 117 (07) : 777 - 787
  • [42] A Comparative Study of Extremely Low-Resource Transliteration of the World's Languages
    Wu, Winston
    Yarowsky, David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION (LREC 2018), 2018, : 938 - 943
  • [43] Systematic Investigation of Strategies Tailored for Low-Resource Settings for Low-Resource Dependency Parsing
    Sandhan, Jivnesh
    Behera, Laxmidhar
    Goyal, Pawan
    17TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, EACL 2023, 2023, : 2164 - 2171
  • [44] Nerve Block Training Phantom for Use with Ultrasound Systems in Low-Resource Environments
    Dubuc, E. A.
    Rust, M. J.
    Salmon, C.
    2014 40TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (NEBEC), 2014,
  • [45] The Low-Resource Double Bind: An Empirical Study of Pruning for Low-Resource Machine Translation
    Ahia, Orevaoghene
    Kreutzer, Julia
    Hooker, Sara
    FINDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, EMNLP 2021, 2021, : 3316 - 3333
  • [46] Low-Resource Comparative Opinion Quintuple Extraction by Data Augmentation with Prompting
    Xu, Qingting
    Hong, Yu
    Zhao, Fubang
    Song, Kaisong
    Kang, Yangyang
    Chen, Jiaxiang
    Zhou, Guodong
    FINDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS - EMNLP 2023, 2023, : 3892 - 3897
  • [47] Exploring the Potential of Prompting Methods in Low-Resource Speech Recognition with Whisper
    Chen, Yaqi
    Zhang, Wenlin
    Zhang, Hao
    Yang, Xukui
    Qu, Dan
    NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND CHINESE COMPUTING, PT III, NLPCC 2024, 2025, 15361 : 382 - 393
  • [48] Cost analysis of intravenous infusion treatment methods in ICU
    Desachy, A.
    Calvat, S.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2008, 27 (11): : 962 - 962
  • [49] Comparative Nursing Methods Lumbar Puncture, Hypodermoclysis, and Intravenous Infusion Trays
    Whitney, Winifred
    Walker, Merle
    Johnson, Sally
    Kelly, Irene
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1930, 30 (03) : 253 - 260
  • [50] Low-Cost, Accessible Fabrication Methods for Microfluidics Research in Low-Resource Settings
    Hoang-Tuan Nguyen
    Ha Thach
    Roy, Emmanuel
    Khon Huynh
    Perrault, Cecile Mong-Tu
    MICROMACHINES, 2018, 9 (09)