A comparative analysis of intravenous infusion methods for low-resource environments

被引:1
|
作者
Tomobi, Oluwakemi [1 ,2 ]
Avoian, Samantha [3 ]
Ekwere, Ifeoma [4 ]
Waghmare, Shivani [5 ]
Diaban, Fatima [6 ]
Davis, Gabrielle [5 ]
Sy, Yacine [7 ]
Ogbonna, Oluchi [8 ]
Streete, Kevin [4 ]
Aryee, Ebenezer [7 ]
Kulasingham, Vasanthini [4 ]
Sampson, John B. [4 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Morgantown, WV USA
[2] Howard Community Coll, Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Columbia, MD USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Howard Univ, Coll Med, Washington, DC USA
[6] Advocate Aurora Hlth, Downers Grove, IL USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; global health disparities; critically ill; low-resource setting; intravenous infusion therapy; sedation; INTENSIVE-CARE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PUMP;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1326144
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Intravenous (IV) therapy is a crucial aspect of care for the critically ill patient. Barriers to IV infusion pumps in low-resource settings include high costs, lack of access to electricity, and insufficient technical support. Inaccuracy of traditional drop-counting practices places patients at risk. By conducting a comparative assessment of IV infusion methods, we analyzed the efficacy of different devices and identified one that most effectively bridges the gap between accuracy, cost, and electricity reliance in low-resource environments.Methods In this prospective mixed methods study, nurses, residents, and medical students used drop counting, a manual flow regulator, an infusion pump, a DripAssist, and a DripAssist with manual flow regulator to collect normal saline at goal rates of 240, 120, and 60 mL/h. Participants' station setup time was recorded, and the amount of fluid collected in 10 min was recorded (in milliliters). Participants then filled out a post-trial survey to rate each method (on a scale of 1 to 5) in terms of understandability, time consumption, and operability. Cost-effectiveness for use in low-resource settings was also evaluated.Results The manual flow regulator had the fastest setup time, was the most cost effective, and was rated as the least time consuming to use and the easiest to understand and operate. In contrast, the combination of the DripAssist and manual flow regulator was the most time consuming to use and the hardest to understand and operate.Conclusion The manual flow regulator alone was the least time consuming and easiest to operate. The DripAssist/Manual flow regulator combination increases accuracy, but this combination was the most difficult to operate. In addition, the manual flow regulator was the most cost-effective. Healthcare providers can adapt these devices to their practice environments and improve the safety of rate-sensitive IV medications without significant strain on electricity, time, or personnel resources.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Drug Label Ribbons to Improve Patient Safety in Low-resource Environments
    Prin, Meghan
    Algeo, Clare Evans
    Kalonga, Lucy
    Mkwezalamba, Christophe
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 131 (06) : 1344 - 1344
  • [32] Minimally invasive thyroid and parathyroid surgery: modifications for low-resource environments
    Ahmad M. Eltelety
    David J. Terris
    The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 2022, 38
  • [33] SPECIFIC CHALLENGES OF CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE SCREENING IN LOW-RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTS
    Kumar, Raman Krishna
    ANNALS OF PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 9 (02) : 112 - 114
  • [34] Cost-Effective Knowledge Extraction Framework for Low-Resource Environments
    Nam, Sangha
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 60668 - 60681
  • [35] Study protocol: Novel Methods for Implementing Measurement-Based Care with youth in Low-Resource Environments (NIMBLE)
    Martinez R.G.
    Weiner B.J.
    Meza R.D.
    Dorsey S.
    Palazzo L.G.
    Matson A.
    Bain C.
    Mettert K.D.
    Pullmann M.D.
    Lewis C.C.
    Implementation Science Communications, 4 (1):
  • [36] Ethics of alternative trial designs and methods in low-resource settings
    van der Graaf, Rieke
    Cheah, Phaik Yeong
    TRIALS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [37] Review of Speech Synthesis Methods Under Low-Resource Condition
    Jialin, Zhang
    Wushouer, Mairidan
    Tuerhong, Gulanbaier
    Computer Engineering and Applications, 2023, 59 (15): : 1 - 16
  • [38] Ethics of alternative trial designs and methods in low-resource settings
    Rieke van der Graaf
    Phaik Yeong Cheah
    Trials, 20
  • [39] Remote Training for Medical Staff in Low-Resource Environments Using Augmented Reality
    Hale, Austin
    Fischer, Marc
    Schuetz, Laura
    Fuchs, Henry
    Leuze, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2022, 8 (12)
  • [40] NutriAI: AI-Powered Child Malnutrition Assessment in Low-Resource Environments
    Khan, Misaal
    Agarwal, Shivang
    Vatsa, Mayank
    Singh, Richa
    Singh, Kuldeep
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SECOND INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2023, 2023, : 6378 - 6385