A comparative analysis of intravenous infusion methods for low-resource environments

被引:1
|
作者
Tomobi, Oluwakemi [1 ,2 ]
Avoian, Samantha [3 ]
Ekwere, Ifeoma [4 ]
Waghmare, Shivani [5 ]
Diaban, Fatima [6 ]
Davis, Gabrielle [5 ]
Sy, Yacine [7 ]
Ogbonna, Oluchi [8 ]
Streete, Kevin [4 ]
Aryee, Ebenezer [7 ]
Kulasingham, Vasanthini [4 ]
Sampson, John B. [4 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Morgantown, WV USA
[2] Howard Community Coll, Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Columbia, MD USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Howard Univ, Coll Med, Washington, DC USA
[6] Advocate Aurora Hlth, Downers Grove, IL USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; global health disparities; critically ill; low-resource setting; intravenous infusion therapy; sedation; INTENSIVE-CARE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PUMP;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1326144
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Intravenous (IV) therapy is a crucial aspect of care for the critically ill patient. Barriers to IV infusion pumps in low-resource settings include high costs, lack of access to electricity, and insufficient technical support. Inaccuracy of traditional drop-counting practices places patients at risk. By conducting a comparative assessment of IV infusion methods, we analyzed the efficacy of different devices and identified one that most effectively bridges the gap between accuracy, cost, and electricity reliance in low-resource environments.Methods In this prospective mixed methods study, nurses, residents, and medical students used drop counting, a manual flow regulator, an infusion pump, a DripAssist, and a DripAssist with manual flow regulator to collect normal saline at goal rates of 240, 120, and 60 mL/h. Participants' station setup time was recorded, and the amount of fluid collected in 10 min was recorded (in milliliters). Participants then filled out a post-trial survey to rate each method (on a scale of 1 to 5) in terms of understandability, time consumption, and operability. Cost-effectiveness for use in low-resource settings was also evaluated.Results The manual flow regulator had the fastest setup time, was the most cost effective, and was rated as the least time consuming to use and the easiest to understand and operate. In contrast, the combination of the DripAssist and manual flow regulator was the most time consuming to use and the hardest to understand and operate.Conclusion The manual flow regulator alone was the least time consuming and easiest to operate. The DripAssist/Manual flow regulator combination increases accuracy, but this combination was the most difficult to operate. In addition, the manual flow regulator was the most cost-effective. Healthcare providers can adapt these devices to their practice environments and improve the safety of rate-sensitive IV medications without significant strain on electricity, time, or personnel resources.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ductal Stenting in Low-Resource Environments
    Sasikumar, Navaneetha
    Toshniwal, Pranoti
    Bayya, Praveen Reddy
    Sudhakar, Abish
    Kumar, Raman Krishna
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 46 (03) : 525 - 535
  • [2] The physiology of invasive plants in low-resource environments
    Funk, Jennifer L.
    CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 1 (01):
  • [3] Awake Tracheal Intubation for Low-Resource Environments
    Maini, Naveeta
    Rodney, Grant
    Baylis, Claire
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 133 (3S_SUPPL): : 774 - 774
  • [4] Comparative Analysis of Transformer Models for Sentiment Analysis in Low-Resource Languages
    Aliyu, Yusuf
    Sarlan, Aliza
    Danyaro, Kamaluddeen Usman
    Rahman, Abdulahi Sani B. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 15 (04) : 353 - 364
  • [5] A systematic comparison of methods for low-resource dependency parsing on genuinely low-resource languages
    Vania, Clara
    Kementchedjhieva, Yova
    Sogaard, Anders
    Lopez, Adam
    2019 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING AND THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019): PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE, 2019, : 1105 - 1116
  • [6] An overview of high-resource automatic speech recognition methods and their empirical evaluation in low-resource environments
    Fatehi, Kavan
    Torres, Mercedes
    Kucukyilmaz, Ayse
    SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 2025, 167
  • [7] Collaborative Knowledge Infusion for Low-Resource Stance Detection
    Yan, Ming
    Joey, Tianyi Zhou
    Ivor, W. Tsang
    BIG DATA MINING AND ANALYTICS, 2024, 7 (03): : 682 - 698
  • [8] Stitching Infrastructures to Facilitate Telemedicine for Low-Resource Environments
    Chandwani, Rajesh
    Kumar, Neha
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
  • [9] The State of Critical Care Provision in Low-Resource Environments
    Biccard, Bruce M.
    Baker, Tim
    Mabedi, Delia
    Waweru-Siika, Wangari
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 134 (05): : 926 - 929
  • [10] A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO BRONCHOSCOPY TRAINING IN LOW-RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTS
    Becker, Torben
    Beamon-Scott, Lindsay
    Darant, Gordon
    House, Stacy
    Bitar, Jerry
    Bitar, Marlon
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (01) : 515 - 515