A comparative analysis of intravenous infusion methods for low-resource environments

被引:1
|
作者
Tomobi, Oluwakemi [1 ,2 ]
Avoian, Samantha [3 ]
Ekwere, Ifeoma [4 ]
Waghmare, Shivani [5 ]
Diaban, Fatima [6 ]
Davis, Gabrielle [5 ]
Sy, Yacine [7 ]
Ogbonna, Oluchi [8 ]
Streete, Kevin [4 ]
Aryee, Ebenezer [7 ]
Kulasingham, Vasanthini [4 ]
Sampson, John B. [4 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Morgantown, WV USA
[2] Howard Community Coll, Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Columbia, MD USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Howard Univ, Coll Med, Washington, DC USA
[6] Advocate Aurora Hlth, Downers Grove, IL USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; global health disparities; critically ill; low-resource setting; intravenous infusion therapy; sedation; INTENSIVE-CARE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PUMP;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1326144
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Intravenous (IV) therapy is a crucial aspect of care for the critically ill patient. Barriers to IV infusion pumps in low-resource settings include high costs, lack of access to electricity, and insufficient technical support. Inaccuracy of traditional drop-counting practices places patients at risk. By conducting a comparative assessment of IV infusion methods, we analyzed the efficacy of different devices and identified one that most effectively bridges the gap between accuracy, cost, and electricity reliance in low-resource environments.Methods In this prospective mixed methods study, nurses, residents, and medical students used drop counting, a manual flow regulator, an infusion pump, a DripAssist, and a DripAssist with manual flow regulator to collect normal saline at goal rates of 240, 120, and 60 mL/h. Participants' station setup time was recorded, and the amount of fluid collected in 10 min was recorded (in milliliters). Participants then filled out a post-trial survey to rate each method (on a scale of 1 to 5) in terms of understandability, time consumption, and operability. Cost-effectiveness for use in low-resource settings was also evaluated.Results The manual flow regulator had the fastest setup time, was the most cost effective, and was rated as the least time consuming to use and the easiest to understand and operate. In contrast, the combination of the DripAssist and manual flow regulator was the most time consuming to use and the hardest to understand and operate.Conclusion The manual flow regulator alone was the least time consuming and easiest to operate. The DripAssist/Manual flow regulator combination increases accuracy, but this combination was the most difficult to operate. In addition, the manual flow regulator was the most cost-effective. Healthcare providers can adapt these devices to their practice environments and improve the safety of rate-sensitive IV medications without significant strain on electricity, time, or personnel resources.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Organizational models of mobile payment systems in low-resource environments
    Wenner, Greg
    Bram, Joshua T.
    Marino, Martin
    Obeysekare, Eric
    Mehta, Khanjan
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 24 (04) : 681 - 705
  • [22] Nitrogen Dioxide Sterilization in Low-Resource Environments: A Feasibility Study
    Shomali, Majdi
    Opie, David
    Avasthi, Trisha
    Trilling, Ariel
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [23] Low-resource Neural Machine Translation: Methods and Trends
    Shi, Shumin
    Wu, Xing
    Su, Rihai
    Huang, Heyan
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ASIAN AND LOW-RESOURCE LANGUAGE INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2022, 21 (05)
  • [24] Comparative assessment of test characteristics of cervical cancer screening methods for implementation in low-resource settings
    Asgary, Ramin
    Beideck, Elena
    Naderi, Rosanna
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 154
  • [25] Data Augmentation Methods for Low-Resource Orthographic Syllabification
    Suyanto, Suyanto
    Lhaksmana, Kemas M.
    Bijaksana, Moch Arif
    Kurniawan, Adriana
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 147399 - 147406
  • [26] Examining Low-Cost Virtual Reality for Learning in Low-Resource Environments
    Vishwanath, Aditya
    Kam, Matthew
    Kumar, Neha
    DIS'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM CONFERENCE ON DESIGNING INTERACTIVE SYSTEMS, 2017, : 1277 - 1281
  • [27] Using Machine Learning to Automate Classroom Observation for Low-resource Environments
    Shapsough, Salsabeel
    Zualkernan, Imran
    2018 IEEE GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (GHTC), 2018,
  • [28] Overcoming the barriers of mobile health that hamper sustainability in low-resource environments
    Maike Greve
    Alfred Benedikt Brendel
    Nils van Osten
    Lutz M. Kolbe
    Journal of Public Health, 2022, 30 : 49 - 62
  • [29] Overcoming the barriers of mobile health that hamper sustainability in low-resource environments
    Greve, Maike
    Brendel, Alfred Benedikt
    van Osten, Nils
    Kolbe, Lutz M.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2022, 30 (01): : 49 - 62
  • [30] Minimally invasive thyroid and parathyroid surgery: modifications for low-resource environments
    Eltelety, Ahmad M.
    Terris, David J.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 38 (01):