Single energy metal artifact reduction performs better than virtual monoenergetic dual-energy reconstruction in CT of the equine proximal phalanx

被引:2
|
作者
Faulkner, Josephine E. [1 ]
Broeckx, Bart J. G. [2 ]
Martens, Ann [3 ]
Raes, Els [1 ]
Haardt, Hanna [3 ]
Vanderperren, Katrien [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Morphol Imaging Orthoped Rehabil & Nutr, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Vet & Biosci, Merelbeke, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Large Anim Surg Anesthesia & Orthoped, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
blooming artifact; distal limb; horse; image quality; metal implant; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING FINDINGS; SAGITTAL GROOVE; HORSES; FRACTURES; CONFIGURATION;
D O I
10.1111/vru.13258
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Metal artifacts in CT negatively impact the evaluation of surgical implants and the surrounding tissues. The aim of this prospective experimental study was to evaluate the ability of a single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR (TM), Canon) algorithm and virtual monoenergetic (VM) dual-energy CT (DECT) scanning techniques to reduce metal artifacts from stainless steel screws surgically inserted into the equine proximal phalanx. Seven acquisitions of 18 cadaver limbs were performed on a Canon Aquilion One Vision CT scanner (Helical +SEMAR, Volume +SEMAR, Standard Helical, Standard Volume and VM DECT at 135, 120, and 105 keV) and reconstructed in a bone kernel. Blinded subjective evaluation performed by three observers indicated a significant effect of acquisition in both adjacent tissues (P < 0.001) and distant tissues (P < 0.001) and the best metal artifact reduction was seen with Helical +SEMAR and Volume +SEMAR. The subjective overall preference of CT acquisition type was (1) Helical +SEMAR, (2) Volume +SEMAR, (3) VM DECT 135 keV, (4) VM DECT 120 keV, (5) VM DECT 105 keV, (6) Standard Helical, (7) Standard Volume (P < 0.001). Unblinded objective evaluation performed by one observer showed that VM DECT 120 keV, Helical +SEMAR, and Volume +SEMAR performed similarly and were objectively the best at reducing blooming artifact. Overall, the best metal artifact reduction was obtained with SEMAR, followed by VM DECT. However, VM DECT performance varies with energy level and was associated with decreased image quality in distant tissues and artifactual overcorrection of metal artifacts at high energy levels.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 685
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Metal artifact reduction by monoenergetic extrapolation of dual-energy CT in patients with metallic implants
    Lee, Ka Yin Gregory
    Cheng, Hei Man Joyce
    Chu, Chi Yeung
    Tam, Chi Wai Annie
    Kan, Wai Kuen
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 27 (02)
  • [2] Combination of Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstruction Using Split-Filter Dual-Energy CT in Patients With Dental Artifact on Head and Neck CT
    Schmidt, Alexander Marcel Alfred
    Grunz, Jan-Peter
    Petritsch, Bernhard
    Gruschwitz, Philipp
    Knarr, Jonas
    Huflage, Henner
    Bley, Thorsten Alexander
    Kosmala, Aleksander
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (04) : 716 - 727
  • [3] Metal Artifact Reduction in Virtual Monoenergetic Spectral Dual-Energy CT of Patients With Metallic Orthopedic Implants in the Distal Radius
    Yoo, Hye Jin
    Hong, Sung Hwan
    Chung, Bo Mi
    Moon, Sun Jeong
    Choi, Ja-Young
    Chae, Hee Dong
    Chang, Min-Yung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (05) : 1083 - 1091
  • [4] Reduction of Metal Artifact with Dual-Energy CT: Virtual Monospectral Imaging with Fast Kilovoltage Switching and Metal Artifact Reduction Software
    Pessis, Eric
    Sverzut, Jean-Michel
    Campagna, Raphael
    Guerini, Henri
    Feydy, Antoine
    Drape, Jean-Luc
    SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 19 (05) : 446 - 455
  • [5] Optimization of Monoenergetic Extrapolations in Dual-Energy CT for Metal Artifact Reduction in Different Body Regions and Orthopedic Implants
    Horat, Lukas
    Hamie, Mustafa Q.
    Huber, Florian A.
    Guggenberger, Roman
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) : E67 - E74
  • [6] Quantification of Metal Artifact Reduction of Dual-Energy CT: A Phantom Study
    Li, K.
    Leung, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3036 - 3036
  • [7] Complementary contrast media for metal artifact reduction in Dual-Energy CT
    Lambert, Jack W.
    Edic, Peter M.
    FitzGerald, Paul
    Torres, Andrew S.
    Yeh, Benjamin M.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2015, 9412
  • [8] Monoenergetic extrapolation of cardiac dual energy CT for artifact reduction
    Secchi, Francesco
    De Cecco, Carlo Nicola
    Spearman, James Vance
    Silverman, Justin Robert
    Ebersberger, Ullrich
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (04) : 413 - 418
  • [9] Phantom-based optimization of virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction in dual-energy CT
    Richter, Anne
    Razinskas, Gary
    Weick, Stefan
    Lutyj, Paul
    Kraft, Johannes
    Wittig-Sauerwein, Andrea
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3848 - S3849
  • [10] Review of Clinical Applications for Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT
    Albrecht, Moritz H.
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Martin, Simon S.
    Nance, John W.
    Duguay, Taylor M.
    Wichmann, Julian L.
    De Cecco, Carlo N.
    Varga-Szemes, Akos
    van Assen, Marly
    Tesche, Christian
    Schoepf, U. Joseph
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (02) : 260 - 271